As you may or may not recall, we have been touting J.A. Happ for a fair portion of the present season, dating at least to our first ranking of the top summer trade candidates. The veteran southpaw has certainly exceeded even the most optimistic expectations since he ended up being traded. Now, as he prepares for the postseason with the Yankees, it’s worth taking an early look at his potential free-agent earnings.
Happ, of course, already went on the market not long ago. At the time, he was coming off of an oddball 2015 season that he finished in dominating form. His resulting three-year, $36MM deal certainly rewarded a strong late-year push from a pitcher who had — just months before — seemed at risk of entering a late-career journeyman phase.
That pact worked out swimmingly for the Jays, who received 77 generally excellent starts from Happ before spinning him off to the division-rival Yanks for Brandon Drury and Billy McKinney. For New York, the tail end of the deal has been quite a nice asset as well.
In his past eight starts, in fact, Happ has allowed just 14 earned runs on 38 hits, with a 43:9 K/BB ratio, over 46 2/3 innings. For the year, he has averaged a career-high 9.7 K/9 on a personal-best 10.3% swinging-strike rate It’s not all roses, of course. The quality results have come in spite of the fact that Happ has struggled to limit the long ball, allowing 1.4 per nine on the season.
All said, Happ has probably deserved the results — a 3.75 ERA in 160 2/3 innings — that he has produced on the year. The dingers have driven up his FIP (4.01), but xFIP (3.82) and SIERA (3.60) suggest his outcomes matchhis performance.
Looking ahead, the outlook seems promising. Happ is throwing as hard as ever. His output has been steady and excellent for some time now. And he has a rather long track record of durability, having averaged 153 innings for the past eight seasons and 168 annually for the past four (which will go up when 2018 is completed).
It’s possible that Happ will slot in behind Clayton Kershaw, Patrick Corbin, and Dallas Keuchel to become the fourth-highest-paid starter on this lefty-loaded market. Certainly, the more youthful Gio Gonzalez could also stake a claim to the fourth spot, particularly if he finishes strong, but he has had some rough patches this year and his velocity decline remains a concern. Charlie Morton would be in the same general position as Happ, in terms of his age, but with a more impressive recent showing. In his case, though, he has strongly suggested he won’t just be seeking to maximize an overall contract guarantee; if anything, Morton sounds like a man who’ll only sign on for a single season at a time. Fellow veteran southpaw Cole Hamels could surely also be a factor, particularly at a somewhat younger age, though it remains to be seen how clubs will view the sustainability of his recent performance boost since moving via trade.
Regardless of the precise rank ordering, Happ’s general market position makes eminently possible that a fair number of contending teams will view him as a more appealing target than some of the younger, more expensive pitchers ahead of him. Capturing a quality arm for a shorter term, after all, holds appeal in and of itself. There’s no real chance of Happ signing for more than three years, while it could take a five-year commitment to land Corbin or Keuchel. Plus, it doesn’t hurt that signing Happ won’t mean giving up draft picks since he’s ineligible to receive a qualifying offer.
So, supposing there’s steady interest in Happ, what’s the contractual upside here? As noted, there’s no real argument for his reps to pursue a four-year term given his age. Happ will be selling his age-36 season and beyond.
That gives us a rather clear bound. But it doesn’t mean Happ can’t still earn quite well. In fact, two recent comps suggest he can. Entering his age-37 season, coming off of an excellent campaign, John Lackey secured a two-year, $32MM commitment from the Cubs. Even more recently, Rich Hill reached three guaranteed years at the same $16MM AAV despite the fact that he, too, was also entering his age-37 year and had no shortage of historical injury issues.
In each of those cases, perhaps, stellar outcomes helped to drive the paydays. Happ, arguably, hasn’t impressed to the same degree in his immediate platform year. But we already know he could secure a $12MM annual commitment. His steady velocity is a highly notable consideration. And the three-year run-up to this free agency has been stellar. (As of right now: 501 innings of 3.47 ERA ball with 8.6 K/9 against 2.7 BB/9.)
So, there’s certainly a case to be made that Happ ought to out-earn his last contract on an otherwise similar arrangements. Even if he doesn’t quite reach the $16MM annual value level of those prior (and somewhat older) comps, Happ has a very strong chance to achieve more than a $40MM guarantee over a three-year term. And the yearly value could even rise beyond the Lackey/Hill levels if there’s particularly robust interest or if Happ prefers a two-year arrangement.
Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports.
xabial
I love Happ. Yanks got him to supplement the rotation, he’s been arguably their ace. There’s even been some talk of him starting the WC game, if you could believe it. (Tanaka has quieted those talks)
He’s 6-0 in eight starts, with 2.70 ERA. But 4.44 FIP, and 4.24 xFIP. My biggest concern, is his age. I wouldnt give Happ anything longer than a two-year deal, preferably one-year deal. The dude’s 35 years old.
xabial
If only he was a couple of years younger, I would given him 4 years blind-folded. Too much risk involved, regardless of performance, post-trade (Father Time is undefeated) For me It would take the Yanks winning it all to justify giving him 3 years, but so far, give him A.
Wasn’t Derek Lowe the same age (35) when the Braves gave him four years $60M?
NotaGM
You love responding to your own post alot lol..
3 yrs/56 mil
Or
1 yr / 15 mill contract because of demand.
Cat Mando
xabial……Schilling was 36/37, I believe, when the BoSox extended him for 2004-06 and I doubt the regretted it. It depends on the pitcher. Some are work horses who don’t need to go to pasture when others do.
jdgoat
The funny thing is that before the trade happened, everybody was hoping Happ WASNT traded to their team because he had three weeks of bad pitching.
Old User Name
I’ll admit to being one of those. Glad I was wrong.
its_happening
Watching Happ all year I knew if he had any D behind him he’d be fine. The ERA was higher than it should have been due to gutless scorekeepers calling obvious errors hits. Happ can be a nice boost in a short series.
Old User Name
I’m not a big FIP guy. Some pitchers pitch to contact. I think if you use FIP, you need to look at hard contact rate to get the full scope of what the stats are saying.
woodstock005
Supermax contract???
pinballwizard1969
I’d offer him 2 yrs/$30MM with a potential 3 year vesting option based on IP’ed not being on the DL that sort of thing. If some GM wants to beat that deal so be it. Happ is a perfect fit for the Yankees a lefty and with CC being a FA he’s be a solid #3.
xabial
Nice compromise! Vesting options can be awkward, but I think that’s usually with hitters, not pitchers. If he doesn’t perform, he doesnt get paid. Period. Too bad he’s too good for a third year team option tho haha. That would be his age-38 season… Happ, you turned me into a believer so far. Now I know why so many Blue Jays fans swore by you, despite struggles before the deadline
pinballwizard1969
Vesting options are not that unusual. One part of Hamels option for 2019 was a vesting option. and there are other examples.
JKB 2
I think several GM’s would easily beat that deal
pinballwizard1969
Perhaps but unless you try you’ll never know. That’s really not that bad of an offer when you look at Happ’s pitching history and his age and he’s only come close to 200 IP’ed in a season I believe once. If a team did beat that offer I don’t think it would be by much. Then it becomes where does Happ prefer to play., Yankees Stadium, the postseason potential and the Yankees for a lefty is not a bad option for him.
thecoffinnail
With the modern way teams are constructing bullpens it’s going to become harder and harder for pitchers to cross the 200ip plateau. Teams tend to be pulling their starters after the 2nd time through the order. On a healthy year a starter gets about 32 starts which averages to a bit over 6 innings per start to get to 200ip. 170-180ip is already becoming the norm and in the next few years I wouldn’t be surprised to see it at 160. The days of 250ip a season are long gone.
julyn82001
Happ will get his contract! Right now, A’s are the real concern…
iverbure
One year 18.5 mil with a team option for 20 mil. If someone wants to guarantee him more money or more years good. No reason why any pitcher who isn’t a HOF should get multiple years guaranteed if they’re 35+.
Now that’s what I would offer. I could see someone giving him 3 years 48 mil if he pitches well in the playoffs.
greg1
Two years at $15M AAV, third year vesting option at a similar value.
Knowing this is likely his last big contract, and that they’ll be plenty of suitors because of the shorter term and lack of draft pick compensation, Happ is not going to have to settle for a one year deal.
Three fully guaranteed is probably too much, so he takes a little risk, but gets a raise in AAV even as he approaches his late 30’s.
its_happening
Happ’s getting at least $35-mil for 2, plus an option. Maybe more money than that. He’s a durable lefty with some pennant race experience and will attack hitters. A good complimentary piece for a contending team needing a another arm to bolster the rotation.
Johhos
This sounds about right. I fully expect the Phillies to have him on their radar,if they find Corbin’s price too steep . 3/50 with the third year being a creative option , easily vesting if healthy.
its_happening
Corbin’s agent will push the age factor as he’s younger than most free agents. Philly would be a decent landing spot as their high priced players are on short term deals also.
Dicka24
At his age I wouldn’t go more than a 2 year guarantee. The idea of a 3rd year vesting option makes sense if it’s required. Happ has pitched well, and his velocity is solid, so it’s not as if he’s shown signs of the eventual cliff that is going to come. Still, he’s an older guy and in the recent market we’ve seen that teams aren’t as willing to hand out dollars and years as they were before. 2 years at or around $30 million sounds about right as a basis for a deal. Whether it ends up a few million more, or including a vesting option, is the variable.
metseventually 2
Whoever signs him will be very disappointed. The difference between his ERA and FIP is staggering.
jdgoat
It’s a quarter of a run. That’s not far off at all.
Chris Giarraputo
Happ going to a team where games matter really I feel improved focus. That’s true of everyone. Things don’t matter so much we naturally go into auto pilot. Happ now has to show off for his new team and FO. Has to step up and must feel reguvinated being in a playoff race knowing he is pitching important games. Some players play for the $, some for the competition and some for both since it’s a job. He looks more fired up on the mound for Yanks. It could be adrenaline making him pitch great. You can’t give him 4 years guaranteed. He was never a #1 stud who now lost a few ticks of his pitches. He’s been a #3-4 his whole career.
If he continues pitching great into playoffs as a Yankee fan I would offer him 2/$28 with 2 vesting options for innings and days on active roster. You don’t get a raise in sports at the tail end of your career. That’s how teams screw up. He made $12 mil this year. He deserves $18-20? Go $14 and hope he loves playing in NY for a team going to playoffs until he retires. He will take CC’s place. Bring him in at $5 mil. He’s a 6th starter now that he’s a year older next year and his knee is weaker. Get Corbin. Give Sheffield a shot and if Monty as Insurance mid season while it may take until 2020 until he’s 100%. No more Cessa, loisaga, Herman. Cessa has to go. The other 2 groom for bullpen. And maybe Adams for bullpen. He’s not a starter. The yanks made him one when he was drafted.
Robertson scares me. Bring him back on the cheap. He’s not a shit down reliever. And use Greene more early in games for 4-6 outs. Holder stay, Cole gone. And Tarpley and Kahnle let them compete in spring with Herman and loisaga.
But hope Happ gives Yanks a discount. We need every $ to get 1 or 2 top pitchers and maybe a first baseman and some catching depth. Gardy as 4th outfielder. He can’t play at high level after July full time. Or platoon with Frazier if they keep him. I would go old school. Buy pitchers, develop position players. Yanks have too many RHP in upper minors who are just OK but throw hard. Mets built on pitching. Now they over spend on aging position players or use AA players.
Yanks were good when they got starters in FA in 1990’s-2000’s. Use minors for bullpen and position. Buying a pitcher you at least know his history pitching in bigs and his med history.
Oh- and Dump Gray for whatever you can get for him. He is not right mentally. His answers to reporters ?’s are weird. He said he’s a top pitcher in league? He’s mental. He needs small market and a therapist.
And beg, beg Ellsbury to take a buyout. Defer $, give him a title with no work involved. Like with ARod. He needs to go. He takes coaches and REHAB staff away from real players.
Went off topic a bit. But- Yankees offseason I feel needs to include Haap and people got to go. Thanks guys for endulging me.
panj341
Huge mistake by Pirates GM in not signing Happ. Tried to right the wrong by signing Nova.the following year.
Nova no where near the pitcher that Happ is.
Pirates could have kept contending if they has signed Happ instead of Blue Jays.
Can bet that they won’t even try to sign him this time even though he would be better than most of their starters.
JKB 2
Happ will have plenty of offers. Why would he choose Pittsburgh.
cxcx
Should have mentioned that Lackey was saddled with a qualifying offer.
rmullig2
The Yankees will resign him for 3/42.
chuck123
And if he is a stud in playoffs…will get him a nice bump off that