The trade of Manny Machado to the Dodgers will be the first of many for the Orioles, as executive vice president/general manager Dan Duquette told reporters in a conference call Wednesday night that the Orioles are set to embark on a rebuild of both their on-field product and their baseball operations and scouting staffs (links via Jon Meoli of the Baltimore Sun, Roch Kubatko of MASNsports.com and Rich Dubroff of Baltimore Baseball.com).
Duquette plainly used the word “rebuild” five times over a 20-minute conference call, Meoli notes — something which he’d previously been reluctant to do. The veteran GM called rebuilding a “grueling process” but also made clear that there’s a consensus among the front office on the need to do so, as well as support from owner Peter Angelos and his sons, John and Lou.
Critically, Duquette acknowledged that the team’s complete lack of a presence in Latin America has served as a roadblock to maintaining a competitive organization and declared that the Orioles will “become more active on the international market and invest in our facilities and strengthen our overall baseball operation.” As Meoli points out, the Orioles are still the only team in all of baseball who’ve yet to sign an international prospect on this year’s market (which opened on July 2), according to Baseball America’s signing tracker. Baltimore’s operational and philosophical changes, though will extend beyond an increased commitment to the international market.
“It’s a multi-dimensional plan,” said Duquette of the Orioles’ rebuild. “You have to do a number of things well to compete in professional sports, but we had identified the areas that we needed to improve in — technology, international scouting facilities, the draft, strengthening our analytics, investing in our international scouting, investing in more front office staff to be more in line with our competitors, expanding our nutrition and wellness resources at every level of the organization.”
Though that presents a clear long-term approach to upgrading that’ll require years to fully implement, there are also a number of pressing issues more immediately facing the Orioles. Namely, the front office has fewer than two weeks to determine who else from the roster they’ll trade prior to the non-waiver trade deadline in an early effort to continue to restock their farm system.
“We’re going to take a look at trading the veteran players…the ones that are nearing free agency,” said Duquette. Certainly, it seems that impending free agents Zach Britton and Brad Brach are virtual locks to be moved. Veteran outfielder Adam Jones is also a candidate, though his 10-and-5 rights grant him the power to veto any trade.
The question beyond that, however, is one of whether the Orioles will undergo a more significant roster overhaul. Starters like Kevin Gausman (controlled through 2020) and Dylan Bundy (through 2021) would almost certainly fetch significant returns on a trade market that currently has a dearth of controllable arms. Setup man Mychal Givens, too, is controlled through 2021, has already drawn some trade interest and would command a notable return in his own right. Second baseman Jonathan Schoop, meanwhile, is only controlled through 2019, though his value is probably down after hitting .229/.263/.389 through the season’s first half.
To be clear, there has yet to be any indication that the Orioles will consider moving talent from that group. But with the O’s unlikely to catch up to teams like the Yankees and Red Sox over the next couple of seasons as they restructure the organization, there’s certainly a case to be made that the Orioles should be looking at moving more than just their impending wave of free agents as they look to return to contention in one of the game’s toughest divisions.
However the Orioles proceed, Duquette, whose contract expires at season’s end, made clear that he hopes to remain on atop the team’s baseball operations stucture:“Like I’ve said before, my heart’s in Baltimore and I’d like to make the Orioles into a top, contending organization again.”
Phillies2017
Finally a sensible comment from the O’s. Good, happy it happened before it was way too late for them to get anything back.
dimitrios in la
I posted this on MASN site this morning but thought I’d share it here too:
“As reassuring as DD’s comments are to some, to me they’re unsettling. I think the O’s have some good pieces at the MLB level but clearly there has been a gap that’s widened between the O’s and the rest of the league. I think this has to do with the use of analytics by others, and a lack of it by the O’s.
How else do we explain a team that continues to preach the virtues of “spotting the fastball” when the rest of the league has shifted significantly to using off-speed pitches? How else to explain Adam Jones still in center and a defense that has gotten SO bad while other teams have emphasized and valued it and strengthened theirs significantly?
What role has Buck played in this glaring deficiency? (Have Scioscia and Bochy and Hurdle adapted? I wonder. I know Scioscia had issues with Dipoto’s analytical approach and essentially chased the guy out of town. He’s doing well in Seattle of course, that team looking, with its overall speed, defense, athleticism and contact abilities to be the antithesis of these O’s.) Is he open to their use? Is he committed to their implementation? Is he a believer? If not, is it time to make a tough decision re Buck?
Also, I’m curious about to what extent the FO has used analytics. In the past it’s been reported they have but I suspect (for reasons mentioned above) they haven’t as extensively or meaningfully as others.
I think getting a clearer picture of things—both past negligence on this front and how it happened, but also more specifically what is being done to correct it—is a worthwhile piece of reporting.”
Piro
I agree with you on the Scioscia part, I think the reason the Angels haven’t been able to be a better team is because of him being unable to adapt. And I’m glad Dipoto’s doing well in Seattle, shows he had a plan in place but didn’t have a reliable manager to execute it.
orioles667083
I look at it a couple ways…the Orioles have been burned once again in free agency recently (Ubaldo Jimenez), and have been reluctant to spend money on arms as the Red Sox, and Yankees can easily do, instead we go for a bargain buy and hope it pans out…(Nelson Cruz, Mark Trumbo, Andrew Cashner and Alex Cobb)…you go in hoping to catch lightning in a bottle and you get lucky, other times it looks like you had a bad plan. This year was no plan, Cobb and Cashner were not in shape, and injuries sealed our fate. The Orioles if you want to compete you will need to spend…we made bad decision on Chris Davis…power is nice, but his OBA was always bad, he strikes out 235-300x a year…Smarten up on how you spend, but you will need to spend. We are stuck with Davis’ contract, hopefully he gets his head and bat working again…but it’s our own fault.
yankeemanuno23
Orioles need to oust their owner – the main cause for putting the franchise & lack of talent from L.A.
RunDMC
How does one oust an owner? Pitchforks? Sharply-word criticisms from Twitter? Fan attendance protest? As a Braves fan, asking for a friend.
Sheev Palpatine
I’d start with pitchforks
nymetsking
When you’re done with them, can you send them up to NY?
jleve618
They have to be paired with torches for maximum effectiveness.
luclusciano
The Wilpon’s have done well with the limited money they have. Granted they shouldn’t have lost all that money, but – you get what you pay for.
Phillies2017
m.youtube.com/watch?v=yCii4Q_-bLA
mikeyank55
Hey luc-it’s time to stop crying over Bernie Maddoff. That was a decade ago. The Mets have always been shaky financially—that’s why they started depositing money with Maddoff to get their 25% return.
Remember that these are the guys that brought you the Bobby Bo deal.
They are knuckleheads and when they have spent money they have pissed it away on dumb contracts (READ: Cespedes)
dorfmac
Eat the rich
ln13
Actually, my read of the DD statement is…the old man is no longer in charge. John and Louis have taken a much larger role this season, and I think (hope) this is just proof that a new regime has taken over.
mstrchef13
Idiotic statement. You can’t “oust” an owner. Way to state the impossible as if it were a simple solution.
jdgoat
You sure can try though. It’s happening in Ottawa right now with Eugene Melnyk
mikeyank55
It’s happened in LA as well. Boycott and don’t buy tickets to the Mets. Stop watching SNY.
Instead watch their attendance fall and their ratings plummet.
Expose the results on social media as momentum builds.
Embarrass the Wilpon’s (aka Abbott and Costello).
It’s only with a truly committed owner that the front office and management of both the Mets and their minor league affiliates can be cleaned out to begin again.
iamhector24
As a Mets fan let me tell you, getting rid of the owners isn’t easy.
mikeyank55
How many games have you gone to this year Hector?
When was the last time that you watched the team on SNY.
Easy is doing both. Hard is joining the boycott.
MetsYankeesRedSox
I hope they follow this through.
This season is too much like their St Louis Browns days.
lord vincent
This article sounds good after a couple of very frustrating seasons. Has ownership changed it’s meddling with the sons, has DD just been allowed to put a plan together, or is this just BS because the attendance has dropped?
Only time will tell but the next two weeks could be interesting.
CoolKidJoeXBL
The more I read into this, the more I learn about how inefficiently this team is run. They just throw money at mediocre players as some type of expensive but dirty bandaid that the adhesive has been compromised so it just falls off.
lesterdnightfly
“It’s a multi-dimensional plan,” said Duquette of the Orioles’ rebuild. “You have to do a number of things well to compete in professional sports, but we had identified the areas that we needed to improve in — technology, international scouting facilities, the draft, strengthening our analytics, investing in our international scouting, investing in more front office staff to be more in line with our competitors, expanding our nutrition and wellness resources at every level of the organization.”
Well, Dan, 29 other teams recognized all that already, and have years of a head start on your Orioles’ “new plan”.
The Lerners’ light bulb flickered on about 10 years too late. You’ve got a lot of catching up to do, Dan–if you’re even around to start the process.
OrioleDan
Let’s be honest here- This isn’t Dan’s “plan”. This is most like the sons of Angelos looking at the baseball landscape and seeing how inept they are run, and finally having some authority from dad to make changes.
I’m sure if DD has his way, this would of been done years ago and It’s probably why he tried to escape to Toronto, in order to have more authority to implement a quality organization instead of being hamstrung time and time again by Peter Angelos.
Rwm102600
This is why I’ve been defending DD for years. He knows what needs to be done and he has the knowledge to get it done. He has been handcuffed by ownership. I still hope they keep him and Buck for the rebuild. If left to their own best judgement, I think they can handle it the right way and do what’s best for the team.
its_happening
Agreed. DD and Buck are good baseball men.
Paul Miller
I am certainly no O’s fan at all, but I agree completely.
Houston We Have A Solution
Boggles my mind how Orioles wont sign IFAs……..but their centerpiece to the machado do was an IFA.
And theyll probably get more IFAs teams signed in a Brach Britton Jones Givens trade…..
But if you dont get a deal you like, QO britton, brach, jones and get picks back if they sign elsewhere or retry next year to trade them.
Steve Adams
If you check out the full stories from Kubatko and Meoli, Duquette specifically acknowledges the appeal in getting a player like Diaz, who cost the Dodgers upwards of $30MM to sign, because they haven’t really had access to those types of players under ownership’s previous (and inexplicable) mandates about international philosophies.
As for the qualifying offers, there’s a chance Britton would reject at season’s end if he finishes well. Brach and Jones would take $18MM for one year in a heartbeat. No way you can QO either of them.
Houston We Have A Solution
Its a rebuild. Sign cheap options looking to rebuild value trade at deadline.
QO for 1 year 18 mill you chip in cash to help reduce their salary if and when you trade him next year.
If Brach has a better season next year you trade him and his salary for what you can get, even if that means paying the entire salary for remaining year.
3 things the orioles should do
1. QO britton brach and trade salary to help facilitate deals next year
2. Sign cheap vets
3. Take back bad contract or two for assets.
thefenwayfaithful 2
“…they haven’t really had access to those types of players under ownership’s previous (and inexplicable) mandates about international philosophies.”
This is why its hard to place blame on the O’s front office outside of ownership. They don’t want to give big money to a free agent pitcher. They didn’t want to invest more in player development and scouting. They didn’t spend on IFA’s so Duq did what little he could with that bonus money to acquire talent. But where, realistically, does O’s ownership expect him to find talent? Its not like they got back to back top picks like the Nats did when they got Strasburg and Harper (no brainers). It’s not like they are going to go find a Tanaka or an Otani and then spend the money.
I’m really not sure where Duq is expected to find talent in the situation he’s in. I’ve been shocked at his loyalty to the organization. I think a lot of guys would have walked.
ln13
Jones, Brach and Britton would be wise to actually take the QO. Nobody is giving them $17M.
CardsNation5
Facts. Dumbest thing that I’ve heard in a long time. No wonder they never go anywhere. The way that the O’s run their organization has always baffled me.
mstrchef13
Why were they willing to acquire an IFA when they have been so unwilling to sign them as youngsters? That’s an easy question to answer and gets at the heart of Peter Angelos as the owner of the Orioles: RISK. With Diaz, the Dodgers already assumed all the risk and he turned out to be as promised. In signing IFAs, the Orioles would assume all the risk and from a risk-reward perspective, it’s a 50/50 shot (or less) whether a high profile/cost IFA works out. As a lawyer, Angelos Is decidedly risk averse and has run his team accordingly (no IFAs, no long term deals for FAs, especially pitchers, exceptionally tough medicals, etc.).
People can disagree with the philosophy all they want, but you can’t say it is not a legitimate and justifiable way to run the team. Had the Albert Belle deal back in the 90s worked out well for the team, we may have seen a different organization these past 20 years. But, water under the bridge as they say. Perhaps with the sons in charge now things will be different.
About DD: I think he wanted to go to Toronto because he didn’t like not having final authority over baseball decisions. It wasn’t about analytics or philosophy or anything like that.
luclusciano
But that goes against everything. Every young player you pick up comes with risk. How many top prospects never panned out in MLB? (A lot) there is no reward without risk.
MetsYankeesRedSox
baseball-reference.com/bullpen/1922_St._Louis_Brow…
For Oriole fans
bleacherbum
Can Schoop play SS?
roguesaw
He has. Whether that translates to “he can” is another matter entirely.
CardsNation5
I think that Beckham goes back to SS
mstrchef13
Quite possible that the guy acquired from LA will be the shortstop. The alternative is Beckham at SS and Valencia at 3B (cringe).
bobtillman
DD’s always been the poster boy for a highly successful small market GM (Montreal) whose skills didn’t translate when he moved to the big time (Boston, Baltimore). I’m not sure of his base abilities; he had phenomenal scouting with the Expos, but then left the Sox with a completely barren system, and the O’s haven’t got much (tho I think it’s better than generally assumed).
Just for the sake of some change-making, he and Bucky probably need to go. This is a pretty proud franchise, steeped in a lot of tradition for its excellence, which looks downright shabby right now. It was a team effort.
thefenwayfaithful 2
Duq royally screwed us in Boston, but I think he learned a lesson there. I really think ownership is the most at fault here. I discussed the Chris Davis handcuffing below. Also note why Duquette has traded away all their international bonus money:
“According to Baseball America, the Orioles spent roughly $260,000 last year on five international amateurs, far below all other big league teams that were eligible to partake in the international market. That’s a stunningly low number. It’s such a definitive reality, though, that Duquette routinely has traded away international bonus slots, knowing the money wouldn’t be spent otherwise.” pressboxonline.com/2017/06/15/orioles-reluctance-t…
A lot of the things you’d normally blame the GM for were not his fault in this case. He’s going to be a scapegoat if fired. His biggest flaw is not standing up for himself and owning his position on the team.
bobtillman
Using the Forbes and Cot’s numbers, he (or they; I think ownership indeed is over-involved) spent 150M on MLB payroll, with about 250M in revenue. That’s about 60% of revenue, a MUCH higher proportion than industry standard ( runs about 43-47 %). When you’re spending that much on base payroll, it’s hard to spend in other areas (player development, IFAs, etc.).
It all comes out of the same pot…..obviously step #1 is to balance the equation. They’re not poor by any means, but those contracts are going to hinder improvement over the next several years.
The Yanks are loaded, both above (MLB) and below (minors). The Sox core is still young. The Jays have 2 impact players coming, and enough “chips” to get better quick on July 31. The Rays always seem to over-achieve.
Not going to be easy……
thefenwayfaithful 2
Its hard when you have 2 or 3 really, really amazing teams ahead of you who you will have to face in the playoffs, if you make it. It’s a great time for the O’s to rebuild for exactly that reason. The Astros, Yankees and Red Sox have 2 more years of real dominance before most guys are free agents after 2019 and 2020 (the Yankees have a couple extra years time then the Astros or Red Sox).
The counter issue is you have like 10 other teams trying to tank their season for better draft positions, so its a tough time to tank. O’s are doing a good job, but they need to stink MORE. It’s a really funny discussion I was having last night.
This new CBA has been a disaster in some regards.
thediesel4
Who would like to take a bet with me that they don’t rebuild and end up doing the exact opposite this offseason?
mmarinersfan
I would bet 20000 dollars against that.
thefenwayfaithful 2
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I feel for Duquette. He’s been handcuffed by ownership at times and by bad contracts signed by ownership at times (Chris Davis, for example). Some articles are blaming him for things that aren’t his fault. He did say resigning Davis was a priority, but he also got very frustrated when ownership had the O’s bidding against themselves (fansided.com/2017/08/14/baltimore-orioles-blame-ow…). He was ready to let Davis walk at a point, and instead the price tag got inflated by 40-50 million with no other bidders.
At the same time, everything Steve says here and Duq has said in the last 24 hours is spot on. Getting more involved in the international market. Refocusing their efforts on player development (as this has been a real issue, especially on the pitching side). They are saying all the right things. However, this is also a team that let Chris Tillman be the closest thing to an ace since 2012 and did nothing about it. I don’t know its fair to blame ownership for not having 1 high quality arm developed or signed over 6 years. And anyone that glanced at any advanced metrics could see that Tillman never posted above a 3.88 xFIP or a 3.88 SIERRA or a 3.99 FIP in the majors. Those are not bad numbers, but that’s not a guy you need to be the leader of your staff. All 3 metrics agree pretty well about where Tillman stands.
I do hope Duq gets the chance to finish what he started. While Dombrowski deserves a lot of credit for what the Red Sox have done, Cherington’s discipline to scrap the high-cost veterans and hit the reset button and then hold onto his prospects has a lot to do with where the Sox are now. Betts, Benintendi, Bogaerts, JBJ, etc could and likely would all be playing for other teams had Dombrowski taken over any earlier then he did. They also would not have likely won in 2013. Duq just needs to take a page out of Cashman’s book and have the same conversation that Cash did with the Steinbrenner boys. My heart is here, but you need to let me run the show or hire someone else you trust.
jeffk-2
The Orioles have never been able to develop pitching. Mussina was the last good starter we developed. Tillman was great but something is wrong. Bundy is good getting better. Gausman only time will tell.
thefenwayfaithful 2
I did misstate slightly. They have drafted some really talented arms. I was scared of Bundy coming up as a Sox fan. Its just the development side that they’ve struggled with over the last decade and change.
I still believe in Bundy’s ability to become something close to an ace and that the right pitching coach might help him take that last step. But some big changes are needed first.
Gausman wasn’t a bad acquisition either, but as you said, time will tell.
mstrchef13
What’s wrong with Tillman is too many injuries and as good as he was he never had an out pitch, so when the rest of his stuff declined he had nothing to fall back on.
jeffk-2
I have defended DD for years but after opening day this year I stopped. The team he put on the field is horrendous. It is 4 MLB players with a mixture of AAA and utility players that should not be everyday players.
blackleather
I’m STILL trying to figure out how a DESPERATE team like the O’s, can trade a MVP type guy and NOT get ANY of the top 3 prospects in LA’s farm system. Really?
thefenwayfaithful 2
Its all about what the other offers were. The Yankees were clear they were not giving up certain guys for a rental. I’m sure the other teams involved had players that were off the table for rentals too. They likely went with the best offer they were getting.
The part of this that is hard to swallow is that this is a move that should have been made in 2016 at the deadline when there was still 2 and a half years of control left. They could have emptied anyone’s farm. The Cubs were stocked and in need of a shortstop with Russell not becoming the impact player they expected. The only team that wouldn’t have emptied the farm for him was maybe the Red Sox due to Bogaerts and Sandoval tying up that side of the infield, but with Sandoval’s injuries, even they might have jumped in.
Their timing was awful. The bidders were limited. The team control was limited. Thus the offers were also likely limited.
jeffk-2
Same thing with Britton in 2016 when had that incredible year. His value would never be higher and he should have been traded.
Piro
The Mets fans are gonna be saying the same thing about deGrom in a few years.
iamhector24
Degrom has been fantastic for years already.
Piro
What I mean is that DeGrom is at his best right now, and it’s the best time for the Mets to cash in, they’re gonna irrelevant in that division for at least 5 years, and they’re not gonna sign him to an extention.
DVail1979
That’s easy … it’s because they waited and waited and waited u til the last moment basically and no team was going to pay full value obviously for 2-3 months of Machado … I’d say all in all Diaz was a hell of a get by DD
thefenwayfaithful 2
I’m with you DVall. I was pretty shocked when they got Diaz and then some. I’d have been pretty happy with just Diaz.
jeffk-2
I used to collect baseball cards as a kid and I would read Beckett and Tuff Stuff and know the value of all my cards.
My dad would say “Its only worth what someone is willing to pay you for it”.
CardsNation5
They should’ve gotten Joc Pedersen. He probably would benefit from a change of scenery
mstrchef13
Because no one (not any team in baseball) would give up a top 3 prospect in the current environment where there is no way to recoup any part of the investment through draft pick compensation. They did well to get a Top 50 overall prospect (who was what I read was their #4 prospect).
hiflyer000
Rentals just aren’t very valuable, no matter how good they are. Teams only have them for a third of a season and they can’t recoup value through a QO comp pick if they lose him in the offseason. I actually think the O’s did very well to get one legitimately good prospect back for him.
Lennon's Dad
A rebuild was obvious given the fact that there really aren’t any great first basemen or DH’s hitting the market this offseason to stick in the outfield, with Cruz possibly being an exception if Seattle doesn’t extend him.
Joking aside, I feel for Baltimore fans. They have a handful of promising outfield prospects now, but the pitching and infield will need considerable work.
DirtbagBlues
Oh, I thought they were going to be buyers the rest of the way.
Sheev Palpatine
They need to dump Davis. His contract was a huge mistake, and they’re going to have accept that and just eat the money.
jdgoat
No they don’t. They’re rebuilding and should be taking on bad money. They can’t be giving up prospects to move guys.
The only way they should move him is if their going to contend, which won’t happen over the coarse of that contract.
Sheev Palpatine
No where in my post do i say giving up prospects in order to get rid of his contract. I said they need to eat the money, meaning release him and just pay him his ridiculous salary in order to get other bats in the linenup
jdgoat
Sorry I assumed you meant in a trade
mstrchef13
Hindsight, and in the big contract era, name me two players whose teams ate multiple years of a large contract and released a player. I can name one, Pablo Sandoval. Out of all the bad contracts teams have signed, no one else has released a player with 3 or more years left on a deal. It just doesn’t happen.
Besides, the only reason to release Davis is if they need to move Mancini to 1B, since Davis’ defense at first is the one thing keeping him in the lineup.
Sheev Palpatine
You’re right, its tough to do but he’s just terrible. He’s getting progressively worse with the bat each year. He could be Keith Hernandez with glove, and it still wouldn’t be worth keeping him on the team with the way he’s hitting
norcalblue
Good luck to the 0’s. Duquette’s statement reflects an understanding that their problem is far greater than just a shortage of major-league talent. That’s seems new and sincere.
The Orioles did as well as could be expected in finalizing their deal yesterday with the Dodgers. Jeff Sullivan, in this article posted last night, provides a very fair assessment of the deal and gives the O’s real credit for maximizing return for their one-of-kind asset. It’s worth reading if you’re a fan of either team.
fangraphs.com/blogs/the-dodgers-have-rented-the-ma…
Ironman_4life
It’s exciting to see all that couch potato general managers comment on what a bad job the front office is doing
bobtillman
I’m sure they took the best that was offered. People tend to forget that the trade market for a guy like Manny is like about 6 teams; severely limits the possibilities.
Actually, considering his pending FA, I think they did OK; certainly not great, but far from horrible. If anything, it strikes me as “stat scouting”.
Freddie Morales
schoop will get traded in the off-season. I know the Mets would be all over him.
Piro
Lol… seriously? Sarcasm?
jd396
“We had identified the areas that we needed to improve in,” said Duquette, before listing nearly every facet of the organization.
thefenwayfaithful 2
This was an intentional stating of the obvious and a reminder to ownership of their (hopeful) commitment to a change in philosophy. Or at least that’s my opinion. He’s essentially letting the O’s fans know that ownership has agreed and committed to this change and if it doesn’t happen, you know why.
It reminds me of Cashman when Boras kind of outed him on his frustrations with Hal Steinbrenner:
“I just I had a meeting with [Cashman] and he just said he is not in on a lot of players that he liked,’’ Boras told George King of the NY Post. “He would like to be in on more, but right now he is working with ownership to see where he can go.”
Boras was sending an intentional message to the Yankees that if the Yankees lose, its your fault Hal. This got the fans on board. This got Cashman all the leverage he needed. A conversation happened. That’s the last we heard of it. Cashman continued his reign as a top baseball executive and Hal and Hank became more silent owners.
deweybelongsinthehall
A team outside of the AL East in need of a 2nd baseman would swoop in to grab Schoop if he became available. He’s a stud and if healthy probably would benefit from a change of scenery.
puigpower
“We identified the areas we needed to improve in – everything”
athingortwo
How many times did Davis stand there in a RBI situation and not swing at a pitch right down the middle. How devastating to the morale of the other players all year long. Is it because he can’t take that certain something that he was taking that got him suspended? Like he’s in a fog. So if someone else was playing first base instead and batted in those RBI situations, even a .250 hitter would have gotten RBI’s to win games or kept the inning going. It’s all because of Davis.
Ironman_4life
I love his glove but your correct. Chris Davis is killing this offense.
jdgoat
Nice to see them finally wise up and use the international market. That was one of the most puzzling philosophies in sports. They were intentionally giving themselves a disadvantage for the past few years.
Caseys.Partner
“Nice to see them finally wise up and use the international market.”
The Orioles just traded away all their international spending pool.
Nobby
The Red Sox need to go after Bundy and give up what it takes to get him.