May 19th: The Padres have made an official announcement of Headley’s release.
May 18th: The Padres have released Chase Headley following this past weekend’s DFA, tweets Dennis Lin of The Athletic. The veteran third baseman is now a free agent. San Diego has yet to make a formal announcement, though the move is listed both on the MLB.com transactions log and on the Padres’ transaction log at their official web site.
It’s hardly an unexpected outcome for the 34-year-old Headley, who opened the season with a dismal .115/.233/.135 performance through 60 trips to the plate and is earning $13MM in the final season of a four-year, $52MM contract that he initially signed with the Yankees. Any team to claim Headley off waivers would’ve been on the hook for the remaining $9.5MM of that figure. San Diego technically could’ve absorbed a notable chunk of that salary in a trade, but Headley’s performance this season surely didn’t drum up much interest from rival clubs in that regard.
Headley is now available to any club that wishes to sign him to a minor league contract, and he’ll only be owed the pro-rated portion of the league minimum under a new deal. That sum, subsequently, would be subtracted from the $9.5MM the Padres still owe him, so they could save at least a small portion of that money if he latches on elsewhere.
It’s unlikely that any team would plug Headley straight into its MLB roster, but he’d make sense for a club in need of some depth at the infield corners in Triple-A. While there seems to be a perception that Headley didn’t provide much of any value to the Yankees in 2017, that’s not really the case. In 586 plate appearances last year, Headley slashed .273/.352/.406 with a dozen homers, 30 doubles and a triple. That’s hardly elite production, but his overall output rated average or slightly better, after adjusting for park and league, per OPS+ (99) and wRC+ (104). Both Fangraphs (1.9) and Baseball-Reference (1.8) felt that he was worth roughly two wins above replacement.
For the Padres, the trade that brought Headley back to San Diego has provided poor results all around in the early going. The trade, of course, was never about acquiring Headley but rather acquiring right-hander Bryan Mitchell from the Yankees. In taking on the remainder of Headley’s contract, the Padres effectively purchased four years of control over Mitchell for $13MM.
Mitchell, though, hasn’t panned out whatsoever in San Diego and has already lost his rotation spot. The 27-year-old came to the Padres with a terrific minor league track record and had shown potential at times in the Majors as well, but he’s been rocked for a 6.21 ERA in 37 1/3 innings with his new organization. While early-season ERA numbers can often be misleading, Mitchell’s struggles aren’t merely the product of poor luck, though. He’s issued 29 walks in 37 1/3 frames — a considerably higher total than the meager 18 strikeouts he’s managed. Mitchell has also surrendered six home runs and yielded a 39.4 percent hard-contact rate to opposing batters, as well (30th-highest among 132 MLB pitchers with at least 30 innings pitched).
Because Mitchell is out of minor league options, the Padres weren’t able to send him to Triple-A to straighten out and were instead forced to move him into the bullpen. He logged a starter’s workload in his lone appearance out of the ’pen thus far, totaling 5 2/3 innings of long relief and allowing three runs — again with more walks (three) than strikeouts (two).
Certainly, there’s ample time for him to improve his performance and to even make the trade a worthwhile one. The Padres, after all, can afford to be patient with him in a long relief role given their 17-28 start to the season, but he’ll eventually need to display better control, as the Friars will become more serious about contending in 2019 and beyond.
benharvey26
With all the injuries, the Tigers could certainly use the depth.
GarryHarris
The Tigers are rebuilding. They are better off trying out youth vs a veteran near his end. They don’t any more need station to station players.
carlote
Yankees
srechter
They’re already logjammed all over the place in the infield. Unless he wants to rot in Scranton waiting for injuries to pile up, he has little reason to return to the Yankees.
thegreatcerealfamine
This is an example of one of those people who should think three-times before hitting post.
davidcoonce74
This was probably destined to happen even if he hadn’t had his usual slow start. He was a league average-or-slightly better player the last few years; he’s only really had two reallygood years in his career but he’s still pretty useful because he can play third without really embarrassing the team, and didn’t look too bad at first last season.
I’ve always wondered how much the Padres hurt his growth by attempting to convert him, from third base to left field at the major league level. as a rookie. It was a baffling decision, he wasn’t good out there and it seemed to stunt the growth of the bat a bit – he hit better once he was moved back to third.
A lot of Padres fans have an irrational dislike of him, especially this season, in which he was put in a position to fail and did, but he’s top-10 all-time in Padres WAR, and that’s not too bad.
JayKay
I’m betting the Mariners pick him up.
#Fantasygeekland
not a good fit, He has played one career game at 2B and hasn’t played in the OF since 2009 and they have a good 3B. They also aren’t absolutely desperate for a 1B.
JayKay
The Mets then. To a minor league deal with an opt out.
agentx
I agree with baseballnerddom that Headley’s not a great fit with the SEA organization but would offer him a minor-league deal nonetheless.
Have him workout at 2B in Tacoma while playing a little 3B and maybe some 1B against LHP and let him go if the parties decide for whatever reason neither benefits from Headley playing in AAA.
mike156
He’s been a decent player…so, there’s no reason why some team won’t sign him to a minor league contract. His best bet is to serve as a depth piece on a contending team.
davidcoonce74
I was thinking the Phillies, who are contending and have money to spend, but it looks like Franco has recovered after his bad start. I mean, it looks like Pablo Sandoval is still in San Francisco, so maybe a fit there, especially with how bad Longoria has looked.
gilgunderson
Longoria and Sandoval are both doing OK this year. Headley won’t be any improvement.
davidcoonce74
Longoria has a 275 OBP. That’s not very good. But I doubt the Giants would actually bench him for anyone else. So yeah, not a good fit.
srechter
What happened to longo’s plate discipline?? He used to be plus in that department. Screams an overly-aggressive approach to compensate for diminishing bat speed. Though, to be fair, this has been an ongoing trend the last few years for him. This year just seems more pronounced than ever.
davidcoonce74
I don’t know if the park might be hurting him; but he really seems to be scuffling. Every part of his batted-ball and plate discipline is down this year.
jb19
Another bad move by Preller… anyway, the Astros have a 3b that’s tearing up AAA and the Astros are in need of a LH reliver. I’m thinking Brad Hand for JD Davis, and two other prospects. Probably someone like Armentaroes, Martes or Paulino. And a position player. I don’t see why Hand is on the Padres when he is an easily tradable asset… also, no, you aren’t getting Tucker or Whitley so don’t ask.
ray_derek
I still don’t think it’s that bad, Mitchell will bounce back
davidcoonce74
Mitchell is puzzling to me; the stuff looks good, at least for a relief role, but the control has been awful. That was never a huge issue before; I’m surprised there hasn’t been a phantom DL trip for him to work out his struggles. I still think it was fine to take on Headley’s money to acquire a good arm; The Padres can afford it and when they acquired him they hadn’t really spent any money in the offseason and there was a real concern Hosmer was going back to KC.
kingtopher
Yeah, even if they were to cut Mitchell loose, it isn’t like it will set them back next year or anything. Even with Hosmer they aren’t spending that much money this year.
Anthony Surfs
SD was never worried about Hosmer leaving back to KC. He signed the contract and that is it.
davidcoonce74
I wonder if Davis is enough to headline; he’s already 25 but the Padres starting third baseman, Villanueva, is 26 and having some real defensive struggles. Armenteros is like the 20th-best prospect in Houston’s system and Paulino has already had TJ and a PED suspension. I think Hand who is dirt-cheap and controllable for 2 more seasons, might fetch more than that, especially from the Astros, whose only hole seems to be LH relief.
RedRooster
JD Davis isn’t even a top 100 prospect. He’s not headlining a Hand trade.
SixFlagsMagicPadres
I don’t think it’s going to be enough. Preller will be asking for a lot more for Hand, especially closer to the Deadline. The Astros do have the pieces though. Overall, I think it’s just a matter of “when”, not “if” Hand gets traded.
davep-3
Controlled for 3 more years – club option in 21
davidcoonce74
Ah, yes, for some reason I thought that was a mutual option but if he’s good still by 2021 the option is affordable at 10 million.
Phillies2017
It wasn’t that bad. They didn’t give up anything (Blash) and had no money on the books at the time. It was a worthwhile risk that still has time to pan out.
As for Hand, I still think he’s traded. The extension was to gain leverage.
jb19
Astros want Hand. Astros have ML ready prospects to send in return plus additional prospects. I see Armentaros at 12th best prospect on the Astros farm coming off an excellent season last year. Martes is a former #1 prospect in the system. Has great stuff but does have control issues this season. Paulino would probably be in the Padres rotation if he were in that system… whatever the prospects, I can see it happening, but it won’t be Tucker or Whitley.
Anthony Surfs
Hand is a great closer what makes you think hell be traded?
RedRooster
Then they will keep Hand.
SixFlagsMagicPadres
An excellent closer is not a necessity on a rebuilding team like the Padres. Hand’s value is only going up, and they would be silly not to cash in on it soon in order to build up their farm even more. Also, they have multiple guys who could step in to the closer role if he is traded. Guys like Maton, or some of their minor league relievers will likely be the future closer anyway by the time they start contending.
RedRooster
He is signed into years that they should be contending and what you just said here is exactly what the Yankees said when Preller wouldn’t take their low-ball offer for Craig Kimbrel three years ago. And you know what happened? Their biggest rival was willing to play ball and now the Yankees get to face Kimbrel in the 9th all the time.
bastros88
what logic is that?
RedRooster
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA no. No. You aren’t getting Hand for a bunch of fringe prospects. Itlf it’s Hand you want, the trade starts with one of Whitley, Tucker or Bukauskas. Otherwise, they will just keep him. With 4 years of control there isn’t any kind or urgency to trade him.
jb19
Ok. It will be interesting to see how this goes. Hand should have been traded last year, but I keep hearing this Guy is worth so much and yet he’s wasting away in SD.
RedRooster
Yankees said the same thing when Preller wouldn’t trade them Kimbrel for peanuts 3 years ago. How’d that work out for them?
thegreatcerealfamine
You’re full of it about the Yankees by the way. Trade this guy or shut up about it.
bastros88
pretty good, they have one of the best bullpens in baseball
RedRooster
Offer fair value or shut up about it.
RedRooster
So do their arch rivals the Boston Red Sox.
brucewayne
The Padres are still not contending 3 years later! They don’t need Hand now, just like they didn’t need Kimbrel then
brucewayne
and should trade Hand now while he’s at his highest value. But I don’t think he’ll bring as much as what most Padre fans think he will.
vmmercan 2
Well, they signed Andrew Miller for less money and then traded for Chapman for a BS deal like they wanted for Kimbrel and then turned both into Clint Frazier, Justus Sheffield, Gleyber Torres, getting Warren back and adding Billy Mckinney.
I would say it worked out really well for them.
RedRooster
That was the same argument the Yankees made when Preller wouldn’t take their crap offer for Kimbrel 3 years ago. Didn’t work then, won’t work now. If teams aren’t going to pay up Padres will simply keep him. Nothing says they can’t contend before Hand’s contract is up.
RedRooster
Just because the Reds have a horrible FO that will take crap offers for impact relievers doesn’t mean the Padres (or really most teams) will. The Yankees still weren’t able to bully Preller into taking their crap offer for Kimbrel, the return Preller ended up getting for Kimbrel was much better, the Yankees still have to face Kimbrel in the ninth all the time and they (or anyone) still won’t be able to bully Preller into taking a crap offer for Brad Hand. Put up or shut up.
vmmercan 2
I understand the premise but the implication is in some way the yankees “lost” by lowballing preller and the reality doesn’t confirm that. Cashman instead did get a premiere closer lowballing someone else and then flipped him for an elite prospect and then resigned him. Just like the reds fo doesnt mean the padres did something wrongthe sox fo doesnt somehow mean cashman did either. And facing him in the ninth inning in the division is irrelevant to whether they should have given up a kings ransom to get him instead of nothing for chapman. The sox have lost every season series since hes been there and won one playoff game. Again, it worked out just fine for the yankees regardless of how it worked out for the padres
RedRooster
My point is the Yankees lost Kimbrel and Preller clearly wasn’t quite as stupid as their FO thought to walk away from their lowball offer. Now this jb19 guy is doing exactly what the Yankees’ talking heads were doing 3 years ago. Acting like the Astros are doing Preller a huge favor with that lowball offer and he’s an idiot for not taking it because “They aren’t contending and now Hand is just wasting away on a bad team!” Hand can be traded at any time and if the Astros or Yankees aren’t willing to pay up, someone will be.
vmmercan 2
Well his point was silly to begin with. During any given season there’s 10-15 contenders. Chances are the reliever market will always always be greater than one team.
RedRooster
Exactly, so clearly he is wrong to say that Preller should just take what he can get for Hand now (as were the Yankees with Kimbrel) as Hand is controllable for years and the offer he suggested was garbage. Preller has all the leverage in a Hand trade.
jb19
Sure as hell not getting Whitley or Tucker. GTFOH with that nonsense. Gerrit Cole had a lower return than that. And Cole is more valuable than Hand.
RedRooster
Pirates were having a fire sale and just took what they could get for Cole and McCutchen. Preller isn’t going to do that with Hand. If Astros don’t wanna play ball Padres will simply keep Hand. He’s going to cost at least one top 50 prospect.
Mendoza Line 215
Pirates fire sale consisted of one player,McCutcheon,and that was because they over reacted now and could not get a good haul for him one year earlier.They were afraid that the same thing would happen for Cole so they traded him to an organization who had four good players to give up.
The Padres need good players so it may be wise to help their rebuild by getting several good players from a very deep organization for one very good player.
RedRooster
No one is getting Hand without giving up a top 50 prospect. For the Astros, it would have to be one of Tucker, Whitley or Bukauskas. JD Davis and Yordan Alvarez aren’t good players.
davidcoonce74
It seems like the Angels could be a fit as well, although I think they are up against their budget. I wonder if Atlanta thinks they could actually contend as well, because Camargo hasn’t been good.
Caseys.Partner
“34-year-old Headley”
Only 34 years old and he didn’t “bounce back”?
Shocking.
Any articles about Ian Kinsler “looking for a big second half”?
davidcoonce74
Headley just turned 34, he was a 2-win player last year at 33, his skillset ages ok because he doesn’t rely on athleticism and draws walks. There’s no reason he should have just fallen off a cliff; he’s always a slow starter and barely playing couldn’t have helped.
go_jays_go
All the more puzzling that Preller dumped Solarte for a couple of fringe prospects.
davidcoonce74
For some reason the Padres never really liked the downward trajectory of his plate discipline. and the defense just wasn’t great anywhere he played. But it does seem that they could have gotten more for him. Oh well. Solarte also had his worst season in 2017 and maybe the Padres thought they were dealing him at the right time. There also wasn’t much advantage having a player like Solarte on a rebuilding team.
its_happening
Solarte was a salary dump and a guy not part of the future plans for San Diego. After a down year he was traded for what he was worth.
RedRooster
A salary dump? They were paying him peanuts! How was that a “salary dump?”
its_happening
4.5, 5.5 with an 8-mil option in 2020 for a player on the downslide of his career is peanuts? Ok then…
RedRooster
For Solarte’s production that is most certainly peanuts! Especially when half the deal is in club option form.
its_happening
Umm, ok there….
Kwflanne
Headley…. another Padres hitting prospect who never came close to living up to the hype. See: sean Burroughs, Khalil Greene, Josh Barfield, Rymer Liriano, Cedric Hunter, Hunter Renfroe,…. just to name a few.
Trying to look back and find the last time the Padres had a homegrown position player who was well regarded throughout the league for more than just one season….
Tony. That’s about it.
davidcoonce74
Headley is 6th in Padres history in WAR…(position players).. He’s actually been a lot better than all those other guys you mentioned, by leaps and bounds. Some of those guys were fringy anyway, like Hunter and Barfield, and Greene was traded when he was still an average player. Burroughs had off-field issues, Liriano and Renfroe had huge red flags as minor-leaguers.
There’s this notion that because Headley couldn’t repeat his super-fluky 30 HR season he was bad, but he was a useful player for a long time, for the Padres and the Yankees.
davidcoonce74
The list, by the way, of all-time position player Padres by WAR. Gwynn, Winfield, AGon, Tenace, Richards, Headley, Nevin, Caminiti, Giles, Colbert. Obviously, all the other homegrown players on this list were pre-Gwynn, but Headley was well-regarded enough to command a four-year contract from the yankees in free agency.
its_happening
In terms of a bat, I’d take Nevin, Caminiti, Giles, Colbert, Gary Sheffield, McGriff, Klesko and an old Steve Garvey over Headley in terms of former Padres. Some guys didn’t play long enough in San Diego to log that misleading stat called WAR.
Yes, the stat is misleading and a means to help baseball writers and stat nerds to push very good players into the Hall of Fame.
davidcoonce74
Explain what you don’t like about it? Very curious.
Most HoF voters still use outdated stuff like pitcher Wins or RBIs in their HoF voting. The WAR totals listed are only for their Padres career, yes, so that’s why I used them. Obviously Steve Garvey’s whole career might have been better, but by the time he got to San Diego he wasn’t much of a hitter because he literally never walked.
Argue with WAR all you want but it is a better way to measure all facets of a player’s game, not just silly stuff like batting average or RBIs.
srechter
Leave the trim reaper be. There’s no convincing someone set in there ways over the internet. He’s wrong, and most of the baseball community knows it. This is an old conversation at this point. War is established.
davidcoonce74
I know. I suppose I shouldn’t have even started when someone calls WAR a “stat,” but the people who hate it are still puzzling to me. Why would you dislike something that gives you more information?
srechter
It hurts the narratives of some of their favorite players that put up
big counting stats but don’t have the war to back it up. They prefer their worldview to reality, and ya can’t do much about that.
davidcoonce74
Although, I have to admit, I did look up Garvey’s 1984, the WS year. he batted 284/307/373 with 8 home runs. As a first baseman. He led the league by hitting into a staggering 25 double plays. He played every game, 653 PAs, and the only reason he had any positive value is because of defense. Heck, even if you’re an old-school RBI fan, he drove in just 86 runs, batting behind Wiggins and Gwynn. Those are not good numbers.
The fact that Garvey turned out to be a garbage person is beside the point, but is also a thing.
its_happening
If you’re too rattled to prove your point I understand. No, my “favourite” players are not punished by WAR. So that ‘s another wrong point on your part. Waiting for you to show why you’re right but I really don’t care.
its_happening
Meh, Garvey was on his last leg. Still had one of the biggest homeruns in franchise history. Clutchness matters. Driving runs in to take a lead matters. Scoring more runs than the other team matters. Tapping a ball to second base to score that run from third matters more than taking that walk to set up the DP situation.
As for the WAR being called a stat….so long as it’s used and ranked highest to lowest, it’s a stat.
davidcoonce74
What specifically about the WAR metric do you disagree with? I’m genuinely curious.
davidcoonce74
Okay. Walks lead to runs too. Getting on base – not making outs – is the most important skill for a hitter to have. Clutch isn’t a skill, because it has never shown to be repeatable. I loved Garvey too, as a kid, but he cost the Padres runs and wins every season he was on the team.
I agree that “scoring more runs than the other team matters.” WAR is designed to precisely measure how much runs scored and saved contribute to “scoring more runs than the other team.”
srechter
Not rattled at all, bud. There’re plenty of resources detailing the efficacy of war elsewhere that will do a much better job than I can. No need to drudge up arguments that were finished years ago. Go read the resources and expand your understanding! Old school and new school both have a place in evaluation.
its_happening
Walks do not lead to runs. Walks lead to batters reaching first base. You need hitters to drive in runs. Period. Base hits with runners on second base gives your team a chance to score that runner. A walk simply puts the force back on.
But you can take that walk if you like.
I can admit Garvey wasn’t a great example. His best days were long gone by 1984.
Although WAR is misleading, in my opinion, it has some merit. You like to use it in practically every argument. WAR cannot completely tell the full story of a player’s career. Try checking out Bill James’ articles on WAR. Pretty good read.
its_happening
srechter – all you did was bring up assumptions and got petty. If you’re looking to indirectly accuse someone of ignorance please check the mirror if you can afford one.
davidcoonce74
Batters on base lead to runs. The teams that score the most runs, year in and year out, tend to have the highest OBP in the league. Those are just raw stats. Currently the Yankees and Braves lead MLB in OBP, for example. They also each lead their divisions and are 2nd and 3rd in runs scored. (Boston is first but has played more games than the Yanks or Braves)
And yes, Bill James has a lot of crazy opinions these days, and I know he dislikes WAR as a metric, but it has its roots in the research he pioneered in the 70s and 80s. WAR is just a more complete version of James’ Total Runs, which didn’t include a defensive component and didn’t account for GIDP for hitters.
its_happening
Those 3 teams you mentioned are 1,2,3 in the majors in slugging percentage. Boston and Atlanta are 1 and 2 in batting average. Walks won’t help the slugging percentage. Again, teams on D have no problem walking certain guys in various situations because they feel walks won’t hurt them. Happens a lot.
davidcoonce74
Drawing walks often has an ancillary effect of increasing pitchers’ pitch counts. I don’t think there’s ever been an era in baseball history when getting on base was a bad thing; I mean, that notion was what got Bill James – who you cited – thinking about baseball in the first place: how do teams score runs and win games? He found walks and slugging percentage were magnitude of orders better than batting average; one example he used in one of his books was Dwight Evans, who did lots of things well except hit for a high average, but was still far more valuable than high-average singles hitters. And he first posited the notion that putting lots of balls in play wasn’t always a good thing – Garvey is a very good example of this – he never walked and rarely struck out, but created tons of outs because he hit the ball hard and hit into lots of double plays.
As James puts it in The Historical Baseball Abstract, the only finite thing there are in baseball is outs. You only get 27 of them in a game, so not making outs is the most important thing a team can do to score more runs and win more games.
padreforlife
So guessing you don’t think Garvey a HOFamer
padreforlife
Garbage person?
agentx
Yeah, that whole self-described “midlife disaster” that Garvey admitted having in a 1989 Sports Illustrated feature article and other media outlets following a string of overlapping, mostly unhealthy personal relationships.
brucewayne
They have proved that “clutchness” is not a thing
davidcoonce74
Had a couple kids with women that weren’t his wife and paid his mistresses hush money to keep it a secret, once “gave” an entertainer named Marvin Hamlisch his girlfriend “for the night”
No, Garvey would probably be one of the worst Hall of Famers in the institution, just on his stats. A first baseman with no walks or real power, never touched any of the HoF “milestone” numbers, career 329 OBP and 446 SlG%, was maybe the best player on his own team once, maybe twice. He doesn’t check any of the boxes, and the personal stuff doomed him. He wouldn’t be as bad as the Frisch committee guys, but he’d be way down there with them in the ranks of the guys who shouldn’t be there.
brucewayne
So what do you guys think about how they make the outs? Do you think it matters if they hit a line-drive or pop up or strike out ? Isn’t an out an out? Does it really matter when being successful means only getting a hit 3 out of 10 times!
SixFlagsMagicPadres
Out of that group of prospects, Headley is clearly the best. He was never elite, but he had his moments. I think most of the non- fair weather Padres fans knew that his big 2012 season was a fluke, but he still turned in some decent seasons. The problem was they never traded him when his value was at it’s highest.
troll
headley is st louis bound
brucewayne
I don’t see it happening. Colorado or Milwaukee maybe.
bleacherbum
Don’t let the door hit ya on the way out.
Good job AJ, way to get something for him. Geez. Not even someone’s scraps in AA somewhere or taking on a similar contract in price, that is stuck or not being used, ex: Eduardo Nunez, Carlos Gonzalez, Howie Kendrick? I mean something, other than just swallowing 12 million and crossing your fingers that Bryan Mitchell wakes up tomorrow as Jake Arrieta 2.0 in San Diego. Highly doubt it, but go figure.
agentx
I understand critics of Preller’s acquisition of Headley, but I find it hard to believe there was anyone out there willing to give him anything for the destined-for-release Headley.
And of the players you mentioned, Nunez and Kendrick are better, more versatile versions of what Headley has become. Equally unlikely to me that COL would ask Gonzalez to approve a pre-June 15 trade and cut ties with a longtime fan favorite for a player that the Rockies truly do not need.
Headley and the cash to make it an even trade for Tazawa is probably the best that Preller could have done without taking on any future commitments, assuming MIA would see any need for Headley there.
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
Yes I don’t get the premise there. Whatever you think of the trade they bought Mitchell. Which hey if you have budget room it’s not necessarily a bad idea. But Headly plays two non premium positions and can’t really hit much anymore. It begs the question as to why you’d think teams who think they can contend would have any use for him. Beyond Gonzalez you’re two other examples have a role. I’m not sure he’d have a role on ethier team. I’m also not sure why you’d think they could get anything for him.
davidcoonce74
Headley was a league-average hitter last year in the toughest division in baseball.. 273/352/406 in the AL East is fine. He’s a slow starter and the Padres had no reason to play him so he never got going. But there’s not a team with a glaring need at third except maybe Atlanta and why would they deal anything of value when they could just get him for nothing?
Kendrick was playing a valuable role for Washington, batting 303/331/477 while filling in all over, and for dirt cheap, Boston doesn’t really need a third baseman and Nunez makes half of Headley’s contract, plus he REALLY isn’t a fit on the Padres, Cargo can’t be dealt until June without his consent and he also has no value to the Padres, who have way too many left-fielders as it is.
padreforlife
Padres overhyping prospects only handful make it and until they learn how to trade correctly they aren’t going anywhere
GarryHarris
Colorado or Baltimore
phnxdark23
I really hope the Braves take a flyer on him. Camargo isn’t the answer, Riley isn’t ready yet, and Bautista needs to be a bench bat. We have enough young, raw talent…I’d love to see another vet who might be able to make an impact on the lower part of the order and in the clubhouse. Obviously everyone’s happy and getting along now while we’re red hot, but young teams have a tendency to spiral once the losing starts, and it’s quite a long season in what’s looking like a pretty tough division. If it works, we save prospects by not needing to go after a Machado or Donaldson, and if not, it cost us basically nothing and we’re back where we were in the first place.
fox471 Dave
Dodgers- grab Headley for minor league minimum and trade him straight up for Hand. Don’t tell Preller Headley was just released. C’mon, it will be fun.
mikeyank55
Too bad Cracker Jack Sandy has beat him to the punch. “Anytime I can get a player for the minimum I am under orders to do so”. So another cheap Wilpon deal is on its way.
Who cares? Jeff comments,”Hey they are dumb enough to buy tickets. So we pile on meaningless signings and embellish them with wishful stories, and they STILL buy tickets.”
Stop supporting this make believe NY team. No tickets, no mets gear and click to another channel when you are watching television or video for your phone.