As the free agent market continues to plod along, observers have continued to search for explanations. Of course, it’s worth bearing in mind that we’ve been weighing this topic this since late November, when it was already apparent that there were some forces at play that were slowing down signings. The full story has yet to be told, and won’t be until the market resolves itself, but it’s still worthwhile to think about the potential causes and ramifications.
In one of his last posts for Fangraphs, Dave Cameron observes that a lack of parity — on paper, at least — may be one cause of the glacial pace of signings. With leading organizations perhaps preferring to wait to see how their needs develop, and their top pursuers left unsure whether even significant investments will be enough, the current competitive imbalance could be helping to slow the market, Cameron argues.
Let’s take a look at a few links as the hot stove perhaps begins to sputter to life:
- Many others have also tackled the confounding nature of this year’s market in recent days. Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic suggests there’s a “lack of engagement,” not just a lack of deals, in a report that indicates that some agents believe there may be a budding case for collusion. SB Nation’s Marc Normandin takes a historically oriented perspective, examining baseball’s history of collusive behavior and placing the currently stalled market in that context. SI’s Tom Verducci runs through the possible drivers of the slow-down. At Fangraphs, Travis Sawchik wonders if Boras’ approach still works, while Kiley McDaniel (welcome back!) examines the current state of teams’ efforts to find competitive advantage by allocating resources between scouting and analytics. (That last point ties into the view many have expressed that the slow market stems in part from an increasing convergence, as McDaniel terms it, in player valuations and strategies across organizations.)
- The Giants’ top offer to Jay Bruce was at the three-year level but would have promised about $10MM less to him than the $39MM he ultimately scored from the Mets, according to reports from Henry Schulman of the San Francisco Chronicle (Twitter link) and Bob Nightengale of USA Today (via Twitter). It seems that San Francisco was hoping to get some pop into the lineup at a bit of a discount, which is certainly understandable given the still-lengthy list of potential targets available in free agency and on the trade market. One additional name that has long been linked to the Giants, Andrew McCutchen of the Pirates, remains of interest, Nightengale further notes. There’s also a case to be made that the Giants ought to take the opportunity presented by the slow market development while forgetting about the luxury tax line this year, as Andrew Baggarly writes for The Athletic. Of course, that’s also true for a few other teams, and it’s arguable that such interest will help prop things up once player movement begins in earnest.
- There are still ongoing signals that the Cubs could make a splash. As Paul Sullivan writes for the Chicago Tribune, surprise winter additions are fairly commonplace in Wrigleyville. Manager Joe Maddon suggested yesterday that he believes the front office is still looking to build out the roster, Madeline Kenney of the Chicago Sun-Times reports. Maddon spoke highly of both Jake Arrieta and Alex Cobb, Kenney writes, and the skipper also hinted that president Theo Epstein and GM Jed Hoyer may not yet be done in adding pieces to the bullpen mix for the 2018 campaign.
- Seeking value will no doubt still drive Chicago, but it’s an imperative for the Indians. Paul Hoynes of the Plain Dealer names 15 free agents who might represent highly affordable targets for the Cleveland organization. Buttressing the relief corps and adding a righty bat seem to be the top priorities, Hoynes notes.
- Free agent outfielder Jayson Werth has given no indication that he’s readying for retirement. To the contrary, he tells ESPN.com’s Jerry Crasnick that he believes he can play for multiple additional seasons (Twitter links). There’s been little indication to this point that any particular teams are in pursuit of the 38-year-old after a rough and injury-limited 2017 campaign, but that could change once the market gets moving. Werth has posted decidedly subpar offensive lines in two of the past three seasons, but did hit at a league-average-ish .244/.355/.417 clip in 2016 and has continued to hit well against lefties.
- Veteran righty Francisco Rodriguez tells Jon Heyman of Fan Rag that he’s readying for a return and feels he can bounce back from a miserable 2017 season. The 36-year-old almost always delivered results in his 15 prior seasons of MLB action but was tagged for nine homers and 22 earned runs in just 25 1/3 innings last year, with a swinging-strike rate that dropped out of double-digits for just the second time in his long and excellent career. “I still have plenty left,” Rodriguez tells Heyman. “I am hoping to get an opportunity to help a team win a championship. I’m physically way better than I was last year. I’m ready. If I didn’t have it, I’d say it. I’m a straight shooter – my own worst critic.” Rodriguez is not receiving much interest at this point but says he’ll gladly throw for scouts to earn another chance.
1984Tigers
You have the wrong Francisco Rodríguez tagged.
Kylemc33
K-Rod’s stats really went downhill
Steve Adams
Thanks. Weird that our linking script grabbed the completely obscure one. We’ve had that issue in the past with a few people who have common names — Chris Young, notably, comes to mind — but it’s never been an issue with K-Rod. Will keep an eye on that in the future.
wellhitball
If Cobb’s agents already rejected a 3 year, $42 million deal, does that mean it’s out of the question that they call Theo back and see if that offer is still on the table? That’s about all the risk he or any 30-year old #2 starter with a major recent injury is worth, in my opinion. Maybe he’s worth adding a vesting option that takes effect if he absolutely dominates.
dbec72
I agree that the contract should be about what the Cubs offered, but I don’t see how he is a #2 starter. He is more more like a 3 or 4 depending on the team. I’d say he’d be a 4 on the Cubs.
jasonpen
A #4 with upside, for sure.
brewcrew08
When healthy he’s much better than a 4. Unless he’s in a loaded rotation of course. Not too many 4 starters have a career WAR over 10 and a 3.50 ERA
wellhitball
Exactly, so including his injury history you could argue he’s a #3, with a very real upside of a #2 and a less likely floor of a #4 barring injury.
While his performance might suggest a more prestigious spot in the rotation, he may be best suited to the 4 or 5 slot to make sure he gets enough rest. I don’t think anyone trusts him to pitch more than 170 innings this year, if that.
I’m glad we all agree most of us agree that he should take that $42 million deal while it’s still available.
Kevin Bailey
From the reports I heard, the deal was still on the table and they were keeping in touch with him. So that being said, I think if either give a little a deal will get done..
simschifan
I’d love to see Arrieta or Darvish getting signed by the Cubs but likelier would be Cobb which would give them room to make a few more key moves.
marlins17
Indians needing relievers and right handed bat. From the beginning of the offseaon on, i felt the Indiana matched up with the Marlins for an Ozuna and Barraclough trade. I think the win now Indians would have given up Mejia and Mckenzie plus Capel.
Solaris601
The 2 biggest areas of concern for CLE right now is the bullpen and the health and productivity of Brantley and Kipnis.
Thronson5
I think the slow market is the trans trying to gain some control back from the agent and players who have been asking for more and more in past years. Some of these contracts given out are just ridiculous and I think the teams have to do something to pump the breaks a bit.
just@fan
I agree. Seven year contracts for two premium seasons. Not good and not a wise investment
Rob66
K-Rod to the Marlins if he’s willing to work for minimum wage.
66TheNumberOfTheBest
The idea that the players and agents would allege collusion proves they are rather clueless about the CBA they signed last year.
All of this was predictable.
Big market teams “resetting” their luxury tax clocks before the onerous penalties…predictable.
Small market teams paring back pointless spending knowing that the big market teams are only a year away from creating a super league of 6-8 teams…predictable.
The devaluing of position players was not predicted, it was proven, see the return Detroit got for JD Martinez.
Tony Clark got rolled by Manfred because of the MLBPA’s bizarre fixation on the qualifying offer.
NotCanon
I don’t think it’s that bizarre. The QO as it was previously written inhibited star players’ earnings significantly by forcing them to work (potentially for their entire career) at rates well below market value for their results and with zero long-term security, or to force them to decide between essentially taking a year off or accepting a significantly smaller contract from teams due to the draft pick compensation tied to them.
Obviously for the majority of players this isn’t that big of a deal, but you see players like Machado/Harper/Kershaw whose markets would be drastically altered by having the QO literally always be an option (barring a mid-season trade).
Also, just because the outcome was predictable doesn’t preclude collusion. Not to say that there is necessarily, but being able to foresee that FOs would get significantly more tightfisted doesn’t mean that the reason behind it isn’t de facto collusion. In much the same way that it’s easy to foresee cable companies not working to break up each others’ (essentially) monopolies in many markets, because they want to retain competition-free in their existing ones.
CobiEven
I don’t think small market teams are pulling back and giving up because of the big markets. I think the saving their resources for their windows of opportunity based on if they can compete multiple years for at least the wildcard.
deek158
I think there is collusion at the ownership level…..to many long term contracts that don’t pan out……the game has changed, big bucks are gone…..
stymeedone
Thats not collusion. Thats just common sense.
User 4245925809
In the eyes of those who care not if a company/business loses money or not just to pay out wacky amounts? anything is called collusion.
Kevin Bailey
I agree, ownership and front offices have just realized that they don’t have to go out and make those 7 – 10 yr offers as long as the AAV is higher. Also front offices now seem to be more worried about the luxury tax than in any other time before. If the Yankees, Dodgers, Cubs, Giants, Red Sox, etc.. are wanting to be under the luxury tax that says alot about the direction MLB is going..
jekporkins
Couldn’t agree more. Show me any MLB contract for 7-10 years that have panned out and I’ll show you five that didn’t. Look at what signing a 30+ year old player has done to some teams – Pujols, Cabrera, Fielder, Rodriguez. When five-year, $125 million contracts aren’t enough for a DH-in-waiting like Martinez, you just say no. You’ll never be able to move him and the last half of the contract is just dead weight.
Look at the Red Sox – they are still paying for Pablo and have a DH in Hanley that they can’t move. Price has not panned out really. Think they want to be weighed down with more baggage over $20 million in a couple years, not to mention the luxury tax implications? I don’t blame teams for saying no.
BlueSkyLA
Exactly. Cameron at Fangraphs mentions this factor then does not explain why he thinks it might be important. A shame since it seems to be of primary importance in explaining why so many of the most flush teams are not spending big this offseason. The impact of spending more than $197M this year is just too great. MLB has a salary cap now in all but name.
tim815
Collusion is execuives or owners “sharing notes with each other”.
That isn’t likely to be happening.
The punishments for going over limits is ushering in a sort of a salary cap league, though.
pdxbrewcrew
The slow offseason is more about teams being reluctant to hand longer contracts to older players, then amount of money being offered. Free agents over 30 are going to have to start getting used to getting two or three year deals at most.
stymeedone
Its the money, too. To replace a $15mm JDM with a 30mm JDM, Arizona has to have the budget. The soft cap is not what every team uses as their budget. The ones that do, dont have room to add. There are more teams replicating what the recently “successful” teams have done, by rebuilding, and cutting payroll during the tank years. Money desired by the FA players just does not match up with the money teams have to spend.
tim815
Yay for use of “soft cap”.
Surprisingly a Bucks Fan
KRod to the brew crew?
halos and quacks
It’s obvious why the market has been so slow. Teams are starting to know better. Paying 7 years for a 30 year old very rarely works out. Teams aren’t gonna match asking prices and although the agents work for the players, they are gonna continue to hold out until they squeeze out every last penny. Arrieta asking for 150 million is insane. He’s declining. Teams aren’t paying for the past anymore, or not nearly as much. I wouldn’t give out more than 4 years. Hosmer moustakas Arrieta Darvish aren’t gonna get what they want. Especially with next years FA class.
In my opinion, the structure needs to change. I like how In hockey you get your 3 years of minimum way, and then become a restricted free agent where a team pays you a fair amount for the next 5-6 years. That way these players aren’t underpaid for their first 6 years and over paid the next decade.
I’m a firm believer you get paid what you’re worth, but damn baseball has become greedy. The comments “who cares it’s the owners money not yours” but then ticket prices and food etc is crazy expensive. These crazy contracts are dictating prices we pay and it’s ridiculous. The system needs a fair tweaking imo. But I’m glad teams are staying away from these extremely flawed players asking for 7 figures. We need to come back down to earth
pdxbrewcrew
The structure in baseball is similar to hockey’s. Three years of pre-arbitration, three years of arbitration, with presumably escalating salaries, then unrestricted free agency.
I do agree that it’s length of contract. Arrieta and Darvish could sign for $22M-$25M a year right now if they took a three-year deal. Teams aren’t having a problem paying big money to players, it’s paying big money to players when they have regressed to not being worth close to that cost. And I ain’t gonna fault the owners on that.
Jean Matrac
There is no collusion. The slow market is due to more analytically driven player assessment, some of the usual, big spending teams trying to get below the CBT threshold, fewer spots available than the number of FAs, at least for position players, and an underwhelming FA class, some of whom are asking for ridiculous deals that no team should agree to.
Teams waiting for player’s asking prices to come down is not collusion. Also collusion would be very hard to prove. In the past proof centered on a few specific players that weren’t signed, even by teams in need of that specific type of player. Guys were available and got zero offers. Teams are making offers this off-season; Darvish has 5 or 6, and no team is going to be accused of collusion for not giving JDM 6 or 7 years at $30M per year.
ericl
There are a couple of reasons for the slow off-season. One is Scott Boras. He represents Martinez, Arrieta & Hosmer, 3 of the top free agents available. Boras’ game of waiting deep into the off-season to have his clients sign has slowed the whole market. Another reason is next year’s free agent class. That class is so strong that some teams would prefer to save their money for those players
Tom
The idea that because Boras has a number of clients this offseason is the reason the slow moving free agency period is silly. Boras has a number of free agents EVERY year. He doesn’t wait until late in the offseason to get his players signed, they are the exceptions.
This year’s free agency is moving slow because it’s a bad class with unrealistic expectations, and in a market where teams are A) waiting for next year’s class, and B) realizing the more substantially punitive Luxury Tax implications.
The players seem to be getting worse and worse at negotiating the CBAs. They keep wanting to change things to make it more financially beneficial to them, but they end up screwing themselves over.
Also, the idea that players salaries are causing ticket prices to go up isn’t exactly true. Ticket prices, cable bills, etc., will always rise, and if every baseball player took a 50% pay cut do you really think prices would come down? Not a chance. Teams would “invest” that money in other ways.
jd396
That’s part of it anyway. He’s gotta realize that waiting for someone to cave and sign first is a good tactic… but he’s competing against himself to a large degree.
brucewayne
I hope they all get burned for playing the waiting game with Boras!
Jockstrapper
“Buttressing the relief corps and adding a righty bat seem to be the top priorities, Hoynes notes.”
Sounds kinky!
marlins17
Lol
phantomofdb
I don’t care for the notion that baseball has poor parity. I don’t think it should be measured by any one given game, or by how many teams go 81-81. The last 3 champions have all won for the first time in at least 30 years. I’m much more interested in championship parity than I am of the likely outcome of one regular season.
But even measuring the way it’s implied in the article, it’s a cliche to say that once the playoffs start it’s a bit of a crapshoot in mlb. That goes against the notion of baseball not having “any given Sunday”
NotCanon
Has anybody said that baseball doesn’t essentially have an “any given Sunday” as far as the playoffs are concerned? Because there’s a reason teams want to win their divisions rather than face the wild card play-in.
Look at the teams that make the playoffs (as MLB doesn’t suffer from the same relevance-creep as the NBA or NHL). Things have been better in the last few years, but over the past decade playoff appearance breakdowns are very top-heavy.
Yes, 27 of 30 teams made the playoffs in the last decade (counting the 1-game WC), but things start looking less good when you think about the fact that 5 teams (17%) make up 33% of all playoff appearances over the last 10 years. 10 teams (33%) make up 56% of all playoff appearances in the last 10 years.
That’s much better than in the ’90s and 20-aughts, definitely, but we’re a long way from “true” parity when the same 3-4 teams are almost always in the playoffs, and the rest tend to swap appearances around. Especially when those teams are historically playoff-bound teams as well (Cardinals/Dodgers/Red Sox/Yankees), and generally spend considerably more than their divisional rivals.
dswaim
Players are making more money on the front end of their careers now. Teams aren’t going to overpay for free agents and lock up young players who are under control.
chesteraarthur
Instead of collusion, perhaps the gms/owners have just finally taken a look at the recent history of free agent deals and realized they are generally bad value. Especially longer deals to older players.
redsoxu571
It’s rather annoying when, any time front offices wisen up to the inefficiency of free agency, player representatives will immediately label that groupthink “collusion”. Maybe if they can argue why older players (in a sport increasingly dominated by younger ones) are worth their typical contracts even when those contract usually disappoint, they can get them again.
pepesilvia
If werth would show a little self respect and get a haircut teams would line up to get him. I mean the guy looks like a wookie it’s a disgrace to the game. That isn’t good for kids to see either.
fljay73
If teams are working together in some form to limit the market for FAs that is called collusion.
fljay73
Huh?
This isn’t the Yankees & thankfully so.
Like John Kruk once said (paraphrasing)
“I am not a athlete. I am a ball player” 😉
pepesilvia
Yeah we more clubs need to have similar policies. I mean is it that hard to look like a professional. If I grew out my hair and beard like that I’d be fired.
jdgoat
Taking away individualism is not good for the game
pepesilvia
I’m not trying to but that is a bit ridiculous is it not? He couldn’t work at Subway with hair like that they would be afraid he would get a hairs in someone food.
brucewayne
Good thing he doesn’t have to serve food in the OF during a ballgame then huh?
Cashford64
Seriously? Who f’n cares?
brucewayne
His hair
brucewayne
has nothing to do with his athletic ability! It shouldn’t matter ! Jesus had long hair
brucewayne
and a beard too! Was it bad for the kids? Don’t be ridiculous!
Bartman
Reality is that contracts over 5 years are dead or will be real rare. Why pay a player for what he has done in the past when performance metrics for the future performance shows that a majority of players in the last years of multiple year contracts have degraded performance. Long term contracts have always gambled on the amount of degradation plus the real risk of injuries (e.g., Prince Fielder). Teams are no longer willing to accept that risk. Also the luxury tax limits have taken the old school inflation factor out of the equation of acceptable risk..
Smart move is shorter higher value contracts with reasonable options and buy outs. This is all setting up for next years super free agent market and may make players and agents think more about contract extensions with current clubs.
Gwynning's Anal Lover
K-Rod might be a good fit on the Pirates during the overhaul. If he does well, he could be traded to a contender for some prospects.
tigertom0210
The reality is that no one wants to commit $150 million to JD Martinez this year, and then have to pass on Bryce Harper, Machado, Donaldson, Kershaw, Blackmon, etc next year because their budget is spent.
Kevin Bailey
I may be totally missing it, but the way this market has gone and the direction mlb teams are heading, I’m not sure if Harper, Machado, Kershaw etc.. are getting those 300 to 400 million contracts the industry expects. I kinda think this offseason is a sign of things to come..
kbarr888
I will only disagree because I believe that the elite players will still get paid exorbitant salaries and anyone not in the top tier or two will see contract reductions.
Players with talent similar to Harper and Machado just don’t come around very often….. and I think this year’s slow Market is indicative of the fact the teams are preparing to spend big on a few players next year. They are both quite Young and should produce good value for 10 years of a 10-year contract…. unlike the players over 30 looking for an 8-9 year contract.
terry g
The market for high priced free agents is smaller this year with so many teams rebuilding and the top teams looking to control their budgets so they can add from next years free agent class.
Yankeepatriot
Michael Kay stated yesterday that the yankees offered darvish 7 years 160 million but it was pulled off the table once we got Stanton
I don’t believe that one bit but considering how this off season has been filled with misinformation and speculation it fits this years theme perfectly
Cuso
Doesn’t pass the sniff test to me.
Kay was also certain via “an extremely reliable source” that the Yanks landed Ohtani.
Yankeepatriot
Agreed
jd396
I don’t think it’s “collusion” so much as analytics permeating all of baseball. It seems to me the issue is free agents are holding out waiting for what FA are usually worth but just not quite getting the numbers they thought they were going to get. Teams are figuring out that 1) it rarely pays to overpay and 2) the in-season trade market is so robust these days that there are always acceptable alternatives to signing FA. Before lots of teams were as analytic in their decision making process it was easier to just go with your gut and throw money around.
arc89
Collusion happened when teams refused to sign players at discounted prices. Being offered a 5 year deal at $150 million is not collusion at all. Teams are making offers and its the players that are unwilling to sign.
Cuso
Werth had his payday. Time to get out of the line and let someone else get theirs.
dust44
Werth would b a quality add to a younger AL team as a DH/Mentor role. Like the Yanks did with Holliday last season. It would literally have to b the exact right landing spot for that to actually work tho. So those r tough Waters to tread
GoGiantsGo
A quick reminder to Sabes and Evans, if you allow you’re willing to go all out after Stanton, don’t be fooled into thinking other FA’s weren’t paying attention.
Time to spend Gentlemen. You created a bit of a mess with proclamations. And then you stepped in it.
Now showing your offer to JBruce to be FAR less than what the Mets offered, seems a might embarassing for the Team of the last decade……
jekporkins
They are willing to TRADE for someone, which means they don’t lose those draft picks. And Stanton was a very unique case.
Every time someone tells the Giants to spend I shake my head, because there are tons of other fans bitching that they spent too much on free agents that didn’t pan out. I’m actually happy with their low bidding and reluctance to sign an over -30, defense flawed, left-handed free agent. The Giants need an under-30, defense gifted, right-handed acquisition.
CardsNation5
The Cardinals should take a flyer on K-Rod. They need arms and what could it hurt? Sign him to a minor league deal as a non roster invite to Spring training. Low risk, high reward.
Westkycubs
Personally I think if the Cubs just resign Arrieta and Duensing we are set with our other moves.