Diamondbacks GM Mike Hazen told reporters (including the Arizona Republic’s Nick Piecoro) that his team has kept in touch with Fernando Rodney. The veteran reliever was expected to personally attend the Winter Meetings to speak to clubs about a contract, though it isn’t known whether the D’Backs were one of those teams. Rodney signed a one-year, $2.75MM deal with Arizona last winter and turned into a bargain signing for the team, recording 39 saves to go along with a 4.23 ERA, 10.57 K/9 and 52.2% grounder rate.
Some more from around the NL West…
- The Giants have some level of interest in Jay Bruce, Henry Schulman of the San Francisco Chronicle reports. The slugger is known to be on the target list for at least four other teams, though it remains to be seen if the bidding will be high enough for Bruce to land his desired five-year contract. A right-handed bat would be a better fit within San Francisco’s heavily left-handed lineup, though Bruce would check a couple of boxes for the Giants as a power hitter and defensively-capable right fielder.
- From that same Schulman piece, the Giants are impressed enough with prospect Steven Duggar that “it does affect how we view addressing that [center field] need this offseason,” GM Bobby Evans said. “It does give us a mindset more short term.” This would seem to lessen the chance that the Giants acquire names like Lorenzo Cain or Billy Hamilton, who have been both been linked to the team in rumors. Andrew McCutchen has also been mentioned as a possibility for the Giants, yet Schulman writes that “he is not viewed as a priority,” even though the Pirates outfielder is only under contract through the 2018 season and would seem to fit as a short-term answer. Duggar is expected to start the season in Triple-A but would seem to be on pace for a big league debut next year and potentially a regular role by 2019.
- A big bat for third base or the corner outfield is the priority for the Giants at the Winter Meetings, Schulman tweets, and the team may have to sacrifice defense in order to land that type of hitter. San Francisco also wants to address the bullpen, though that will be dealt with later in the offseason.
- The Rockies are interested in re-signing Mark Reynolds, FanRag Sports’ Jon Heyman reports (via Twitter). GM Jeff Bridich has suggested that first base (or any type of bat) isn’t necessarily a priority for the team, though that hasn’t stopped the Rox from checking in on the likes of Carlos Santana or Jay Bruce. Reynolds would be a more affordable and familiar option for Colorado at first base, returning for a third year at Coors Field after hitting .274/.354/.471 with 44 homers over 1034 PA in 2016-17. Despite those slightly above-average hitting numbers, however, Reynolds has only been worth a total of 1.0 fWAR over those two seasons due to his strikeouts and lack of defensive or baserunning value.
- It is “fair to say” that the Dodgers’ 2018 payroll will be lower than $237MM, president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman told MLB.com’s Ken Gurnick and other media. Exceeding that figure would balloon the team’s luxury tax rate to 95 percent and drop their position in the June amateur draft back by 10 spots. Counting arbitration projections and money owed to players no longer on the roster, the Dodgers’ payroll stands at over $208MM for next season, so they do have some room to make upgrades though it seems unlikely that they’d take on any major salary commitments without first unloading some of their existing big contracts.
- Also from Friedman, the Dodgers are prioritizing bullpen additions. Starting pitching doesn’t seem to be a need, as Friedman likes their current rotation depth and wants to give younger pitchers “a soft landing spot in the big leagues to go through their acclimation process. We have a talented enough group to ride that out a little bit.” As Gurnick notes, this makes it seem unlikely that L.A. would re-sign Yu Darvish. Of course, the Dodgers did make a push for one very notable starter in Shohei Ohtani, though that was a unique circumstance due to Ohtani’s minimal costs.
thecoffinnail
Gardner would make sense for the Giants.. Since Ellsbury is digging in his heals and refusing a trade Gardner might be the one to go.. Gardner is only signed for one more year and actually has a bit of surplus value.. Plus, the Yankees have lots of bullpen depth they could include in a deal.. I am not very familiar with the Giants roster but maybe they could make Samardzija available while eating a bit of his contract.. If they could get him down to $13 million or so AAV he would fit perfectly as the #4 in New York.. Maybe Gardner, Betances, and Shreve/Cessa/Holder or a mid tier prospect for Samardzija and cash.. I remember reading about how Cashman had one of his man-crushes on Samardzija a few years ago and I like the fact that he started out as a reliever so his arm has pretty low mileage for his age.. With the addition of Samardzija the Yankees could take their time and let Adams stretch out another season and let Abreua/Acevado/Sheffield etc. season another year in the minors before they start moving them up to MLB.. They would be perfectly setup for a 6 man rotation in 2019 and beyond..
thecoffinnail
Sorry about the long winded late night posts again guys.. Yeah, I have been up sick again.. I will try to start shortening them..
AndyM
I would assume Cashman isn’t ready to trade Betances just yet
dthcm
Yeah, Robertson would be the one to go. He should have a market.
guille
That trade proposal is insane. Samardzija is gonna be 33 by opening day, has 3/60 left on his contract, and you want the Yankees to give up Gardner plus two good, cost controlled bullpen pieces for him? Please if you could elaborate I would be interested, I just hope you are way off on this one. By comparison Gardner has averaged 4WAR the past 5 years, hast 1 year plus a club option at around 11M a year. I wouldn´t move him unless there´s some value going back to New York.
goabes22
So the Yankees trade a good outfielder/lead off hitter/clubhouse leader on a cheap 1year deal plus a stud reliever and prospects for a mediocre pitcher on an albatross contract, seems legit. Yankees don’t need samardzjia at all, at any price, CC + internal options would be vastly preferable
66TheNumberOfTheBest
The Schulman piece shows why it’s important for teams to have a good relationship with their beat writers: So they will do your bidding.
Longenhagen has Steven Duggar listed as the Giants #14 prospect with a 40 FV.
But, the beat writer will float a nonsensical “the Giants will use this guy no one ever heard of instead of trading for a proven MLB player” in order to try to give the Giants some leverage in trade talks with the Marlins, Pirates, etc.
wiggysf
Duggar’s numbers are actually pretty good. Giants have been talking bout him for a couple years.
66TheNumberOfTheBest
Wasn’t that what they said about Parker and Williamson last year?
Guys need to prove they can do it in MLB before you build/plan around them.
aff10
Interestingly enough, Longenhagen himself just noted on Twitter that he agrees that Duggar could be the option for next year (so he’d probably slap a 45 or a 50 on him now) but, yeah, I generally agree with you that teams’ beat writers overvalue their team’s prospects just as fans do. “Oh, let’s just give the job to this guy who’s a 35 FV because he hit .264 last year in AAA,” or something like that, which teams almost never do.
gilgunderson
The problem with Parker and Williamson is they just can’t stay healthy.
And let’s not forget about Austin Slater, who started out well before suffering a major injury himself.
vpolite
No. They weren’t saying that about Parker, or Williamson.
petefrompp
Ummm no- at best both were thought to be platoon pieces- although Williamson showed some promise before the TJ surgery. Neither are considered prospects
Dodgethis
Wasn’t Diggar just named a top outfield prospect?
samadmans
Or…. the giants have been high on this particular player for awhile now, and due to injuries he hasn’t made it yet.
Conspiracy theories are fun but I knew before the offseason started they didn’t wanna clog up CF because they are high on Duggar
SFGiants4ever
You obviously know nothing about the Giants Farm system other than then nonsense you read on ESPN.
1st Duggar is their 7th ranked prospect according to MLB.com.
2nd he was injured most of last year which is why he is a little lower than he probably would be. Check out this AFL and see where he was voted one of the top prospects there.
He’s got plus plus speed, plus defense, and he is a solid hitter that is continuing to improve. The front office isn’t trying to fool anyone, they believe he is the CF and leadoff man of the future for this team.
Joe giovengo
Why would the Yankees give all that up for a guy who is a subpar 500 pitcher. And your going to throw betances in the deal. Wow glad your not a gm
sportsfan101
Bc it’s the Yankees they will pay anything to win. Sam is a tier 2 sp based on talent has he been able to consistently put it together no but the Yankees are known to develop pitching or resurrect sp who were thought to be done i.e. Cc in the most recent memory. You just got Stanton you need to sure up your rotation more then anything you can’t win a championship beating every 10-8 that lineup will go cold at times you need the pitching to shut out other offenses when that happens. Selling high on a rp is the best think you can do as rp are a dime a dozen in the fact they can go from great to garbage in a few years and visa versa.
AGAVE
Not a Yankee fan but which player had a longer future potential?
Ellsbury or Gardner?
Just my impression that NYY line Gardner
tarheels23
Dodgers wasnt good enough to win world series last year.our our sp is not good enough after kershaw who is number 2,3,4 really.plus we need a right handed power bat,bullpen help and starting pitching.andrew friedman needs to do sonething or get out of the way and let sonebody else do the job
underdog
They made it to game 7 of a classic World Series, but sure, “they weren’t good enough” and their Gm should go. The off season literally just started, and they have a very good farm system. They’ll be fine.
WalkersDayOff
If you think last years team wasn’t good enough to win the world series you are clueless. If Darvish doesn’t tip his pitches Dodgers win. Kershaw, Wood and Hill is as solid 1-2-3 as anyone in the leauge.
Thronson5
I’d like to see the Dodgers make a trade for Archer who comes pretty cheap and can be controlled a few years I think but I definitely think cutting the payroll is smart and we got some big contracts going away next year and that’s when we really want to spend when guys like Harper are free agents if he even hits free agency. The dodgers do need to get a late reliever though even if they don’t plan on spending much this year.
sillyscully
Kershaw, Wood, Hill, Maeda, Bueller with Ryu and Stewart as options until Urias hopefully comes back. With the run production the Doyers put up in 2017, I’m pretty sure this rotation isn’t half bad. They need to dump Kazmir, Gonzalez (as much as I love em), and Mr. Yips himself (Brandon McCarthy) with either a trade or buy em out. They will definitely attempt to get Arietta this winter so they don’t have to rely on Maeda’s inconsistencies which will inevitably help them in the postseason. Hopefully they’ll end up going after Machado at the deadline (if O’s aren’t doing well) or at least in free agency maybe move Turner to 2nd to help his knees. Their pocket book is still a bottomless pit. It’ll be an interesting next 12 months.