Last offseason featured a particularly deep free agent first base crop. Edwin Encarnacion, Mark Trumbo, Mike Napoli, Brandon Moss, Steve Pearce and Eric Thames ultimately earned a combined $146MM in guarantees. The 2018 offseason is set to feature yet another deep collection of first base talent, with eight free agents at the position who provided at least 0.8 fWAR to their 2017 teams (note: this list assumes that Adam Lind’s $5MM mutual option will not be exercised). Below is a list of these players sorted by 2017 fWAR, with their respective 2018 season ages indicated in parentheses.
- Eric Hosmer (28) – 4.1
- Logan Morrison (30) – 3.3
- Carlos Santana (32) – 3.0
- Yonder Alonso (31) – 2.4
- Lucas Duda (31) – 1.1
- Adam Lind (34) – 0.9
- Mitch Moreland (32) – 0.9
- Mark Reynolds (34) – 0.8
But while WAR is a great measure of a player’s overall value, it doesn’t necessarily paint a picture of his unique individual skill set. Each of these first basemen have their own individual strengths and weaknesses, so I’ve decided to take a close look at exactly what these players offer to prospective teams. All stats are from the 2017 season.
Power
Isolated Power (ISO):
- Duda – .279
- Morrison – .270
- Alonso – .235
- Reynolds – .219
- Lind – .210
- Moreland – .197
- Santana – .196
- Hosmer – .179
Extra Base Hits Per Plate Appearance (Multiplied by 100):
- Duda – 11.81
- Morrison – 10.14
- Moreland – 9.72
- Alonso – 9.60
- Santana – 9.45
- Lind – 9.30
- Reynolds – 8.94
- Hosmer – 8.49
Duda and Morrison are the clear leading candidates in the power department, with Hosmer showing a weakness in that department relative to the competition. It’s worth noting that Alonso’s power numbers are propped up by a monster first half; he cooled off significantly after a midseason trade to the Mariners. Also worth mentioning is the fact that Reynolds played half his games at hitter-friendly Coors Field last season. A move to any other ballpark could negatively impact his power numbers. Though Santana had a down year in the power department, his larger body of work suggests he might hit for more extra bases in 2018.
Plate Discipline
Strikeout Rate (K%):
- Santana – 14.1%
- Hosmer – 15.5%
- Lind – 15.6%
- Moreland – 20.8%
- Alonso – 22.6%
- Morrison – 24.8%
- Duda – 27.5%
- Reynolds – 29.5%
Walk Rate (BB%):
- Morrison – 13.5%
- Santana – 13.2%
- Alonso – 13.1%
- Duda – 12.2%
- Reynolds – 11.6%
- Moreland – 9.9%
- Hosmer – 9.8%
- Lind – 9.3%
Chase Rate on Pitches Outside the Strike Zone (O-Swing %):
- Santana – 21.4%
- Reynolds – 26.1%
- Duda – 26.8%
- Morrison – 27.7%
- Alonso – 27.7%
- Hosmer – 30.0%
- Moreland – 30.2%
- Lind – 32.6%
Santana is by far and away the leading candidate in the plate discipline department, ranking first or second in all three of the above categories. Reynolds and Moreland could probably be considered to have the worst plate discipline of the group, though it’s interesting that nobody outside of Santana appears to distinguish themselves as extremely good or extremely bad relative to the rest of the crop.
Contact Ability
Contact Rate (Contact %):
- Lind – 83.7%
- Santana – 82.1%
- Hosmer – 80.2%
- Moreland – 75.7%
- Alonso – 75.6%
- Duda – 74.9%
- Morrison – 73.7%
- Reynolds – 67.6%
Contact rate is really the only stat necessary to measure this skill, and Lind, Santana and Hosmer use it to set themselves apart. Reynolds, on the other hand, is an outlier on the opposite end; it seems he’d probably be more valuable to teams like the Athletics or Rays that rely heavily on the home run ball rather than stringing together consecutive walks and hits.
Quality of Contact
Barrels Per Plate Appearance (Multiplied by 100):
- Moreland – 8.2
- Morrison- 7.8
- Duda – 7.1
- Alonso – 6.3
- Lind – 6.3
- Santana – 5.4
- Hosmer – 5.2
- Reynolds – 4.9
Hard Contact Rate (Hard%):
- Duda – 42.1%
- Lind – 39.4%
- Moreland – 38.9%
- Morrison – 37.4%
- Alonso – 36.0%
- Reynolds – 34.5%
- Santana – 33.0%
- Hosmer – 29.5%
Average Exit Velocity, MPH (AEV):
- Lind – 90.6
- Duda – 90.3
- Hosmer – 89.6
- Alonso – 89.2
- Moreland – 89.1
- Morrison – 88.6
- Santana – 88.3
- Reynolds – 87.1
Lind, Duda and Moreland would appear to have a leg up on their competition as far as quality of contact. Santana and Reynolds, meanwhile, rank near the bottom in all three categories. It’s fascinating to observe that, although Hosmer ranks poorly in hard contact rate and barrels per plate appearance, his average exit velocity reflects a valuable skill that led to the best batting average of the group this past season (.318).
Offensive Versatility
wRC+ vs. Left-Handed Pitching:
- Morrison – 109
- Santana – 106
- Hosmer – 99
- Reynolds – 87
- Moreland – 85
- Lind – 81
- Alonso – 80
- Duda – 72
Pull Rate (Pull%):
- Hosmer – 31.3%
- Lind – 35.4%
- Moreland – 37.2%
- Alonso – 40.8%
- Reynolds – 44.0%
- Duda – 46.2%
- Morrison – 46.5%
- Santana – 51.2%
Each of this year’s free agent first basemen is a better hitter against right-handed pitching, even the right-handed Reynolds and switch-hitting Santana. The purpose of looking at their wRC+ vs. left-handed pitching is to expose the weaknesses of Lind, Alonso and Duda, all of whom may not be seen as everyday players. In addition, players without the ability to spray the ball about the field are more vulnerable to defensive shifts, limiting their offensive value. Duda is a clear loser in terms of offensive versatility, while Hosmer is a clear winner in that regard. It would seem as though Reynolds and Moreland are neither helped nor hurt by a look into these statistics.
Baserunning
Fangraphs Baserunning Rating (BsR):
- Hosmer – 1.8
- Santana – 0.8
- Morrison – 0.0
- Lind – [-1.3]
- Moreland – [-2.4]
- Alonso – [-2.5]
- Reynolds – [-2.7]
- Duda – [-3.9]
Statcast Sprint Speed, Feet Per Second:
- Hosmer – 27.5
- Morrison – 26.9
- Santana – 26.7
- Moreland – 26.3
- Lind – 25.9
- Reynolds – 25.9
- Duda – 25.7
- Alonso – 25.3
Hosmer is the best in this category by a notable margin, while Santana provides some positive baserunning value as well. This category also exposes another blatant weakness for Duda. There’s not much else to say about the baserunning value of this group; the above numbers tell a pretty clear story.
Fielding
Ultimate Zone Rating Runs Per 150 Innings (UZR/150):
- Moreland – 5.8
- Santana – 4.7
- Morrison – 2.0
- Duda – [-0.1]
- Hosmer – [-0.4]
- Reynolds – [-1.5]
- Alonso – [-3.3]
- Lind – [-16.3]
Defensive Runs Saved (DRS):
- Santana – 10
- Moreland – 10
- Morrison – 1
- Duda – [-1]
- Lind – [-2]
- Reynolds – [-4]
- Hosmer – [-7]
- Alonso – [-9]
If we’re to evaluate defense based on 2017 statistics, Santana and Moreland get a huge boost to their value. Duda and Morrison grade out close to average, while the remaining four players would seem to be defensive liabilities. While Hosmer is a former Gold Glove winner, he hasn’t been great over the past couple of seasons, so it’s unlikely he’ll be paid for his past defensive reputation. Perhaps most notably, the defensive rankings absolutely cripple Lind, such to the point that he may be limited to American League suitors.
While it wouldn’t be terribly difficult to rank these players based on their expected earning potential, each of the above skills could factor into their ultimate landing spots. The unique skill sets of each of these free agents will cause their overall value to increase and decrease relative to each team, and it will be well worth tracking where each of these players ends up.
cardoso97
Could Lind’s bad UZR/150 be due to the fact he played a good amount of games in LF or does it only factor when he played 1B?
NuckBobFutting
I think because his sample size is too small
pitnick
Those numbers are for first base only.
Worth noting, I think, that his UZR for the year was -2.9 across 269.2 innings, and that all UZR/150 does is prorate those numbers across 150 games. Given that defensive metrics only start to become accurate with a large data sample (UZR’s creators recommend averaging out 3 years, if you have that much), the concept of prorating a few hundred innings is a bit suspect. Basically, it’s a crummy stat.
If you average three years of DRS or UZR for Lind, he clocks in close to average. Is the apparent decline just because of insufficient data or is he actually getting worse as he gets further into his 30s? Either seems plausible to me.
Kyle Downing
Lind’s UZR/150 and DRS above are his first base numbers only. Worth noting it’s a small sample size.
reflect
This is one of the best articles I’ve seen on mlbtr all year.
lonestardodger
Good article. Would like to point out that Reynolds is the only righty here. Moreland bats left-handed.
Kyle Downing
Thanks for the catch! Fixing now.
cygnus2112
Whiff Reynolds (relax, I’ve always dug him) would be best served staying in Denver if at possible and I really do think if the Rays don’t qualify LoMo, the Royals should pursue him hard and get the pick for Hos along with the compensation picks for Moose & LoCain…
SundownDevil
LoMo has the highest (or “best”) rankings on the lists cumulatively, even though he won’t get the biggest contract.
SundownDevil
I liked him better when he tweeted though. He’s still the “Seattle Mariners OF” on Twitter.
cygnus2112
If only LoMo had more than just 2 good seasons…
SundownDevil
Very true. Not sure whether to consider him a “late bloomer” or just having a career year.
pitnick
Really good piece.
geejohnny
I’m guessing that we’ll see all the positions analyzed like this? Hope so….very statistically interesting. More please.
CursedRangers
Agreed. Great piece & would love to see other positions analyzed like this.
Joe giovengo
You can take all of your war stats and all the other crap. Whatever happened to her, rbi, ba. Wins losses era etc. I’m old school. These sabre metrics are for geeks.
Cam
The game began understand the value, or lack of, regarding some stats. In turn, it left a bunch of people behind. People used to think the sun revolved around the earth.
Chris Sale Amateur Tailor
Enjoy the dark ages.
Blow out the candle when you go to bed.
stymeedone
I have looked at some of these “new” stats and have to ask myself exactly what they mean. Lind has the highest exit velocity, but is going to have his option declined. Santana has one of the lower hard contact rates but is going to be the highest paid of this group. I watched Castellanos of the Tiger’s have one of the highest hard contact rates in the AL, but not hit for average. While I realize I am isolating these stats, and in most cases they should be with others for a complete picture, I would still think there would be a visible trend, and I just don’t see it. Make fun of the “old” stats all you want, but ignore them at your own peril. At the end of the year, I would rather have the player with the higher batting ave, than the player who made the hard outs. Some players know how to hit the ball hard, and some players just know how to hit. How do you measure that?
houkenflouken
Nobody ignores the old stats at all. They’re still the main stats but these give us a better look into what their strengths are. A high exit velocity shows the batter has good power and is more likely to hit more homeruns than someone with a lower exit velocity. A high batting average one year doesn’t mean that player will hit the same the next year, and sabermetrics are a good way to tell if certain stats are sustainable or not.
Lance
Exit velocity sounds great but what about the player who just slaps the ball around? Ichiro’s “exit velocity” wasn’t that great I’ll bet but he’s headed to the hall of fame. Give me the guy with the higher batting average. I can tell who does and doesn’t hit the ball hard by extra base hits. I don’t need the exit velocity.
jdgoat
You want to know what happened to those stats? People realized they were trash and don’t show you if a player is good or not
Lance
How in the world did we ever know Mays, Mantle, Aaron, Clemente, Koufax, Marichal, Gibson were great players without WAR?
houkenflouken
War is calculated for those players. Check their respective fangraphs pages.
Lance
you need WAR to tell you Mays, Mantle, etc were great?
old ranger
Now put all of these stats in a matrix with age. years of service & games at the position, injury time and dammit come up with an overall ranking & conclusion per player. Substantiate instead of obfuscate.
Joe giovengo
You got the right idea old ranger
SundownDevil
I do like Kyle’s potential with the statistical analysis. He’s like a young Jeff Todd (Jeff Todd Lite? Diet Jeff Todd? Todd Jr.? Todd II?) with so much potential; maybe they’re related.
Keep the “analysis” to the cold, hard facts (numbers) and less on the opinions (since everybody on here has one and they really aren’t worth that much). I’d say “just my $0.02” but that’s overvalued too.
Yankeefanatic
Agreed…the article should have ended with an announced day for the ranking based on the additional data….say in 24hrs.
Lance
and let’s also consider the needs of a team. Yes, we all love Mike Trout and woul
d love for them to be on our team. But there would be no reason for the Mets to trade half their team to the Angels for him when they have Conforto out there doing a good job and their needs are greater in other positions.
lesterdnightfly
Um, Conforto’s shoulder is a huge question mark. Don’t count on him being 100 percent on Opening Day. It might affect his hitting throughout 2018.
Priggs89
Outside of DeGrom, Syndergaard, and Conforto, you could offer the Angels the entire Mets roster for Trout, and it still wouldn’t be enough.
majorflaw
This is very good, useful work.
Interesting that Lind is worst at Chase Rate and best at Contact Rate. It might be additionally illuminating to know what he and the other players did when chasing non-strikes. Dunno if the data can be spun to deliver that? But if a player is A) good at making contact and B) productive when making contact, it might follow that he would be more likely to swing at pitches he thinks he can hit regardless of location. Or not. It’s a new question.
Kyle Downing
It’s interesting you mention that, because that’s the path Jose Ramirez followed. Had one of the best contact rates on pitches outside the strike zone in baseball for years (and overall contact rate for that matter). Suddenly he’s not afraid to swing aggressively and is squaring up the ball a lot more often, leading to massive offensive improvements in each of the past couple of seasons. Wonder who’s the next Jose Ramirez?
houkenflouken
Chasing non strikes: O-Swing %
Swinging thru strikes: Z-Swing %
CursedRangers
As much as I would hate seeing him in another uniform, the Rangers need to consider trading Beltre. Move Gallo over to his natural position at 3rd. Then sign one of these 1st baseman. Beltre’s $18M would be better served towards pitching. Plus the Rangers need to restock their farm system. Santana would be a nice fit for Texas.
Yankeefanatic
Very pragmatic analysis…but it probably won’t happen
Soxman81
I’m really hoping the Red Sox don’t sign any of these players.
kbarr888
I hear a lot of Cardinal Fans saying that they want Hosmer. Of course…..they aren’t the ones who actually make that decision, but they should “be careful what the wish for”. I think he just might become one of the “Most Over-Paid Players” in MLB.
He’s solid, no doubt……but if we’ve reached the point in salaries that a guy who’s “Solid” gets a 5 yr/$100+ M contract………then it is what it is.
I still think there are better options out there for the Cards. They need a BIG BAT. Hosmer is NOT that, whatsoever….imho
CursedRangers
Totally agree. The vast majority of top free agents become albatrosses to their teams a few years in into the contract.
cygnus2112
Most free agents don’t have the accolades that Hosmer does while hitting the market in his age 28 season…
Nick4747
I hope that the red sox wait out the market and sign a guy late better value in that so they don’t get stuck paying hosmer or santana who I feel might be the clear front runners based off past performance. I’d prefer spend big on a cof than one of these options.
Spyglass1
Carlos Santana never got enough credit. These advanced numbers are incredible. Hope Indians can find way to secure Santana for awhile
Joe giovengo
Baseball has been great for well over 100 years, before the metric bullshit. All this does is make a manager, over manage, like Roberts did taking hill out after 4 innings. Clint hurdle does the same thing here in Pittsburgh.
Like the one fellow said you didn’t need metrics to show how great a player is. And jd groat says they threw out the old stats because it never showed how good players were. Well Skippy you better change your diapers, because Koufax Clemente mays Aaron mantle Ruth and all the great ones didn’t need metrics.
lesterdnightfly
You already said all this. Repeating it doesn’t make it true. And you never addressed the points the others made, other than with infantile scorn.
How’s life back there in 1959?
Joe giovengo
A lot better than yourself I can see. Typical attitude of a baby fed millinial.
GeoKaplan
I’m not a “milinial”—my kids are too old to be millennials—but I recognize the value in statistics which isolate attributes in ways that one-size-fits-all stats like RBI and ERA simply can not.
But by all means, continue to rage against the night.
stymeedone
Sometime, a lesson needs to be repeated for a student to fully grasp the material. New stats allow new perspectives. They don’t eliminate the usefulness of “old” stats.
bobtillman
Let’s remember that metrics are DE-scriptive, not PRE-scriptive…..And there’s TONS of other factors that might influence a player’s performance that are difficult to quantify.
Slavish adherence to metrics is silly; so is ignoring the obvious edge they can give you. Brian Sabean, who does his job pretty well (this year notwithstanding), said it best: Know the stats but also understand the world that the stats happen. In other words, always realize that are RESULT-ive, not CAUSE-itive.
Goobar121
Would be interesting to see ratings for danny valencia…as compared to moreland and lind
ken48tribe
Don’t completely understand ISO. Could someone please explain.
jdgoat
It’s just slugging minus batting average
ken48tribe
Thanks
Cardinals17
The Cardinals REALLY needs Hosmer as their new first baseman! For fielding, average, power and his attitude. Won’t solve it all, but it would be a great start!!!