The Athletics’ search for a new ballpark has gone on now for years and taken many twists and turns. It’s far from over, but as Phil Matier and Andy Ross of the San Francisco Chronicle report, the club has now settled on a preferred location for a new park that would keep the club in Oakland.
A’s president Dave Kaval has penned a letter to the Peralta Community College District expressing interest in building on a parcel of land in the vicinity of Oakland’s Laney College, per the report. Working out an agreement with the landowner is just one of many steps that would be required, of course, with massive infrastructure and permitting needs among the major hurdles to be cleared.
The A’s intend to utilize private financing to construct the ballpark, which is expected to cost something in the range of $500MM. Kaval emphasized that the preferred site had advantages in securing the needed investment against the other sites that had been considered, including potential for nearby mixed-use development. You’ll certainly want to read the full reporting from Matier and Ross to understand the considerations at play and remaining obstacles.
Kaval also hinted at some real optimism despite the long road ahead. “Finally, we’ve got our site,” he said, suggesting that the team sees this as a key step. Even if things go well, though, the report makes clear that construction won’t begin until at least 2021, with the still-hypothetical new stadium potentially ready for games in the 2023 season.
The stakes are high for the A’s, who have been searching for years for an avenue to a new ballpark and now face a phase-out of MLB revenue sharing. While the O.co Coliseum has become something of a lovable dump, it is ill-equipped to maximize revenues. (Of course, it also became a possible site for a new park once the NFL’s Raiders left town; instead, the A’s propose turning it into a community sports park that might host an urban youth baseball academy.)
Many other organizations with less compelling needs have reaped huge financial windfalls through taxpayer-funded parks built through efforts that lacked many of the complications present here. While the A’s figure to seek quite a bit of public assistance for infrastructure projects, the team won’t be able to call upon public money or significant political streamlining to accomplish this complex undertaking.
rayanselmo
Lovable dump? You’re half-right.
pd14athletics
As an A’s fan I couldn’t word that any more perfectly. Lovable dump sums it up just right.
Donald Munson
I agree 100%, I love the Coliseum despite it being a dump.
bkwalker510
Yeah, I’ll cry when the coliseum is gone and they open up a new park. I love it. Many great memories there.
arc89
Will the Giants fund a opposition group to derail the new stadium? The giants made it clear they want the A’s to move away. If giants are caught funding the opposition to the A’s new stadium MLB should remove all territory rights from them.
mitchj4444
This will go like the nationals situation went with Baltimore.
arc89
Not close because O’s had previous rights to DC area but Giants have no rights to Oakland area. If the giants tamper on any aspect of the new stadium MLB needs to come down on them immediately.
ABStract
Why would u even bring this up? The Giants never “made it clear they want the A’s to go away”. They simply wouldn’t give up the rights to the largest and fastest growing city in the Bay Area.
Stop blaming the Giants for all your problems A’s fans! It’s your ownership that refused to improve the team or the stadium despite being billionaires! It’s your ownership that sold off every player and never put a team on the field that cost more than they were getting from revenue sharing! The only reason they’re closing on stadium sites is because MLB has told the A’s owners that they’re free ride is over and it’s about time they pay to improve their team like everyone else. The owners were severely abusing the system and many years were paid more by from revenue sharing than they put into paying for their own players salaries. They let rev-sharing pay for their entire payroll (which means all profits baby-where’d they go I wonder?)! It’s not like they don’t have the money, they just have more fun making money off of other teams hard work and would rather not spend their own, given the option. Your owners have chosen not to put money into your team. Bottom line. Stop blaming anyone but them for the A’s struggles!
Jesus, it’s like being mad at your neighbors dad because yours won’t get you the toy u want…
The Giants (at least financially) are doing just fine. I doubt that what the A’s do even comes up, let alone effects the Giants in any way. Not to mention they’ve got enough to worry about after this season
arc89
Stick with the facts not your opinion. Firs Larry Baer came out and said that it would be good for the Giants if they left. When the A’s wanted San Jose a opposition group was funded by the giants. The only reason the giants have rights to San Jose is that the A’s former owners signed over the rights when the giants wanted to build there. I bet you didn’t know that at one time the A’s had the highest revenue in baseball. Fact is the A’s came very close once before at putting a stadium in jack london square but Mayor Brown at that time nixed the deal rather spending it on his legacy academy. A’s haven’t struggled which is a myth they have stayed very competitive.most years. Let’s see how many giant fans come out in the next few years while they become the bottom feeders of the NL west. In the bay area the team that wins the most out draw the other team. It has always been like that give the A’s a new stadium and they will outdraw the giants.
ssball
The A’s were never close to putting a stadium at Jack London. They located a potential site, which is the roughly same site as the Howard Terminal location favored by the current mayor and a few others. The problem with that site is it’s further from BART than the one they are proposing, it requires crossing a railroad track from downtown where you sometimes have to wait about 15 minutes and the space isn’t actually large enough for a stadium and parking.
bkwalker510
It’s ok; in 5 years when the A’s are fielding a World Series caliber team and the Giants are the laughing stock of the NL, the A’s will rule the market again (just like the 70’s/80’s)
If I were SF, this makes me very nervous.
Antitoxidote
The Giants should be doing well financially .
I hear Panda hats are selling like hotcakes this year.
66TheNumberOfTheBest
The Giants stance on San Jose after the A’s gave them the rights (in order to help them, no less) is one of the most shameful acts in pro sports history.
It’s almost like giving someone a brand new car for free only to have your car break down and they tell you to “start hitchhiking” while they drive off laughing in the car you just gave them, leaving you stranded along the road.
jekporkins
Guys, it’s a littler preliminary to start bragging with only speculation about a new stadium in a location that doesn’t sound ideal. and with a team that currently sits in the cellar with the Giants.
gilgunderson
The bitterness of A’s fans is only matched by their delusion.
arc89
They were close but Brown screwed the A’s over. Money would have come from urban development and the A’s pitch in the rest. The city planner that worked out the deal was fired when he brought it public. Brown was mad because he had plans for the money. The city planner went on to Washington DC and was the one that help the nationals get a stadium.
hawaiiphil
Sadly it does appear that you are right.
Twinboy
Shut up
brandons-3
Except these franchises have been here a long time. MLB dumped the nationals on Baltimore just over a decade ago
Deke
I’m a Giants fan and I agree. There’s plenty of fans and corporate money to go around in the Bay Area.
mrkinsm
A 200,000$ house in the Bay area 20 years ago is now worth 1.2M$. Plenty of money in that area.
pustule bosey
yeah because higher rent and mortgage means more money in people’s pockets right…. you need to learn econ 101 – or just math.
arc89
He was talking about the money flow. People with money spending local create jobs for the businesses around Oakland. You do know that with a new stadium it will bring in shopping and restaurants. .
Chris Sale Amateur Tailor
It often does the opposite. There’s 81 days a year where nobody is going to shop or eat there. Who wants to hang out around a stadium
agentx
There is actually significant evidence that new stadium construction has very little economic benefit to existing businesses and/or residents. Several new stadium developments have even had a negative economic impact overall when their lifetime value is properly evaluated against the benefit of programs and services their host cities could have provided with the bonds, grants, and other improvements spent on such development.
xabial
Wolf Chan, he gave you nothing but facts. I have no horse in this race (I’m neither a Giants or A’s fan) but it’s common fact California has some of the highest cost of living in the United States. It only makes sense, houses there are worth millions too. When an area has EXPENSIVE houses, that are continuing to rise in value, faster than most others, it indicates HIGH DEMAND and therefore value.
Dare I say, it almost reminds me of Manhattan real estate.. I know they’re polar opposites of the country (East Vs West ) but purely from an economic perspective. Hmm.. maybe Brooklyn, would’ve been a better example..?
Expensive houses there is a good thing and indicate a prospering Area for businesses and fans alike. He even went one step further, and gave you specific numbers (A $200,000 house is now worth $1.2M), time frame (20 years ago) and specific location (Bay Area)
I don’t know what more you could ask from the guy.
pustule bosey
As someone that lives in the area and is a homeowner you have to know that more expensive real estate really doesn’t translate to more expendable income. Income is higher but doesn’t keep pace with the rise of the housing costs. The real estate keeps pace with the highest level of income and not the median, so generally the tech sector are the guys that it it’s modeled after and not the other bazillion people that live here, especially in the East Bay whose income has stayed fairly flat while housing costs raise- a lot of people ended up selling and leaving putting more high priced houses on the market. Add to all of this the fact that a huge number of places have been bought in cash by foreign investors who then spin the places to management companies that raise prices….. It’s not as simple as you make it out
xabial
Yeah I just wanted to focus on the rising value of houses. I always thought it was a good thing Cali houses are growing in value faster than most of the houses in the rest of the nation.
But you’re right, many variables come into play. The only thing that comes to my mind is the especially high cost of living there (and no i’m not talking about the mortgages) and how it’s such a big state, I’m sure some areas are much more valuable than other areas for accommodating a MLB team.
ssball
The Giants have never been against the A’s in Oakland, just San Jose because so much of the Giants corporate money comes from Silicon Valley.
pustule bosey
the giants have never wanted the A’s out – they just didn’t want them in santa clara because it cuts into giant’s territory bboth for SF and SJ giant’s attendance.
jonnyblah
Of course they’ll fund a secret opposition group. Deep conspiracy, somebody call Mulder and Scully.
agentx
There have been several high profile lawsuits involving real estate developers funding citizen opposition groups to oppose developments proposed by competing developers.
Google “real estate anti-SLAPP” for precedents if you don’t believe this sort of thing ever happens.
julyn82001
Best of luck young A’s…
Manny's Pancakes
Wow, kudos to the A’s for using private financing. Great that the site is a 9 minute walk from BART.
rycm131
I think the only way that An Oakland Stadium can be appealing would be if it’s on the water. As an A’s fan and living a few minutes from Oakland, there is very little appeal to Oakland as a city. It’s improved greatly over the years, but still an extremely dangerous place without any of the “cool factor” of San Francisco. If you’re an A’s fan you’ll go to the new stadium, but you’d also go to their current dump. If you’re a fringe fan, why would you drive an extra 15 to 20 min and go to one of the nicest stadiums in baseball in SF?
ssball
You should actually come to Oakland. Very little of the city is dangerous (although the dangerous areas are awful). The cool factor is high with as many hot restaurants as SF, quite a few night spots and a TON of hip daytime stuff.
This is a great location right next to downtown and as close to BART as AT&T park is.
arc89
Dangerous place? No less dangerous than any big city. Most of the trash from Oakland has moved to pittsburgh/antioch area. Oakland has been taken over by the tech industry and driven up house prices to highest they ever been. The new stadium will be as nice as SF stadium. The developers will buy up the land around the new stadium and make it a trendy place. Look at Jack london square which used to be a dump is now becoming a night place area to see music and eat food.
bkwalker510
Yeah dude, you’re sorta outta touch. Oakland is officially a lot “cooler” than SF, especially since the tech takeover of the city. The Laney site is as good as it gets, and downtown Oakland is thriving/not half as dangerous as people think.
bkwalker510
Not to mention the weather (for baseball) is usually much better in Oakland than SF. All those east bay bandwagon Giants fans will hop back on board with the green and gold once the A’s are fielding a winner, opening up a new yard, and the Giants slump into being a perennial last place club here in the next couple years.
BravesCanada
Does the lot have enough room for foul territory?
pustule bosey
I think they need to knock down a few blocks on either side of the ballpark to fit oakland’s foul territory..
ssball
Andrew Ross. I’ve never seen him referred to as Andy.
KillahAC
I’m a Red Sox fan and I think the Colosseum is awesome.
dodgerfan711
Its awsome for visiting fans. Any time someone wants to go to san francisco after landing in oakland you pass buy it. So for visiting fans its a staple. However its frustrating for the people of oakland to have such a dump of a stadium.
greatdaysport
2 words….las Vegas
CCCTL
… is welcome to the Traitors, and good riddance.
willi
You mean Trump Right !
arc89
Wait until all the Vegas home owners start paying the raiders free money. Each Vegas property owner will pay at least $1000 in taxes because of the raisers. So for that $1000 plus you don’t get nothing but a team in your city.
SundownDevil
Agreed…Oakland has had more than enough time to figure this out, and fans stopped showing up long ago. Time to give another deserving city and fan base a chance — Vegas, Montreal (of a stadium deal went through), Carolinas, etc.
julyn82001
It was actually Walter Hass, former A’s owner, who have gave those territorial rights to the SF Giants! Guess Hass had good intentions…
pustule bosey
the upside – on fireworks night I’ll be able to see them from my house now
the downside – all the traffic that is down by the Colosseum is going to get pushed up close to me
willi
No Public Money at all for the A’s, It Owner is a Multi Billionaire , why in God’s Name to Citizens support using Taxpayer money so some Company can make the Profit from it , is Beyond any rational approach to stadium’s getting Built. You want a House you build it with YOUR MONEY
CCCTL
1) The A’s have stated REPEATEDLY that they are privately funding the new ballpark.
2) John Fisher *and his two OLDER brothers* are the three heirs to The Gap, whose value the two older brothers have dragged to the ground through mismanagement.
Fisher is not involved with the running of the business of either The Gap *or* the A’s. He knows his strengths, and running a business is not one.
3) Again, the A’s have stated REPEATEDLY that they are privately funding the new ballpark.
Do you feel like an idiot spouting uninformed ‘hot takes’ yet?
willi
You also believe in the Tooth Fairly !
Come back in two years and Beg forgiveness !
Jean Matrac
William: So you believe that tax-payers will be saddled with the cost of the new stadium despite the city saying they wouldn’t pay for it, and the A’s owners saying it would be privately funded? Cynical much? There’s a reason why the Raiders are moving to Vegas. The city refused to pay for their stadium too. The difference between the Raiders and A’s is the Raiders are going where the money is, and the A’s do want to stay in Oakland.
The Giants privately funded their ballpark, and now that the debt service has been satisfied they look to make even more money than if the city had built a ballpark for them. It’s a reasonable model for any team that likes where they are and are looking to stay.
Dogham
Oakland is a modern day version of Fallout 3. The city sucks, the stadium sucks, the fans suck. Hope this team follows the Raiders and move to Las Vegas.
Varangian
Troll scum
agentx
C’mon, bruh… tell us more about Fallout 3.
BalcoBomber
Fallout 4. The story of Dogham’s teeth.
Soxman81
As a Red Sox fan who grew up in Sacramento and always attended A’s games rather than Giants games, I can attest to the loyalty of Oakland fans. These are real fans. I love them. Maybe not the drunk guys in the bleachers that want to fight, but 90% of A’s fans I’ve encountered are great baseball fans. They have continued to support their penny pinching team in a crappy stadium through good times and bad. A’s fans are the working class fans in the Bay. They deserve a new stadium.
Jean Matrac
I don’t get the obsession A’s fans have with the Giants. I suppose the blocking of the A’s move to San Jose inspired it, but that area brings in a huge amount of money to the Giants. Had the roles been reversed no one could fault the A’s for blocking the Giants. Teams just don’t give away huge financial benefits to other teams.
But the A’s fans paranoia about the Giants is what I really don’t get; it’s ridiculous. Someone said Larry Baer said it would benefit the Giants if the A’s moved away. Big deal. If the A’s said as much about the Giants they’d just be being honest, because it would have definitely benefited the A’s had the Giants moved to Florida as they almost did. Saying an A’s move would benefit the Giants is not the same as wanting them to move. It’s a false equivalency.
I think most Giant’s fans feel bad for the A’s and their inability to get out of that pit, which restricts their revenue, and prevents them from being competitive. But A’s fans love to heap on the abuse whenever something bad happens to the Giants. I guess that’s just the result of greater recent success. But, as a Giant’s fan, I hope the A’s are able to pull this off, and build a gem of a park. There are AL players like Trout, Altuve, Betts, Lindor, etc., that I would love to see, but I will not go to the Coliseum. But I would it they had a better park.
CCCTL
“Had the roles been reversed no one could fault the A’s for blocking the Giants. Teams just don’t give away huge financial benefits to other teams.”
That is literally what happened.
In the early 90’s, with Candlestick broken and the giants needing a new home, A’s owner Finley gave the rights to the giants so they’d have a fallback if they couldn’t get something done in SF.
The giants returned the favor by refusing to give the rights back when the A’s asked, although the agreement to do so was recorded in a minuted meeting.
pustule bosey
This is very true… The funny thing is that when the giants suck, like they have forever until recent time.. the giants fans tend to support the A’s, but when the reverse has happened in recent years A’s fans gripe about it- and they seem to think we giants fans think that the A’s are our hated rivals but giants fans know that the only real rival is the dodgers-
EatabagaDeez
Anything they do can’t possibly be any worse than parks like fenway or wrigley.. the A’s will be big one day…
pustule bosey
I really want the A’s to do well, hopefully a new park will inspire them to spend some money on players so that when they manage to get a Sonny or cespedes they can build around them instead of cashing them in so they don’t have to pay them and rolling the dice on a few prospects.
jleve618
Do you all realize noone wants to read a comment you leave that is longer than the article you left it on?
Big Poison
There are some nice stadium sites in Vegas.