The Cubs made an effort to lock up National League MVP Kris Bryant on a long-term extension this offseason but “got nowhere” in their efforts, Tom Verducci of Sports Illustrated reports. Verducci notes that the Cubs made efforts to lock up several of their young players, in fact, though they weren’t able to push any of them over the finish line. Chicago’s lone offseason extension was a one-year extension for excellent setup man Pedro Strop — a nice move for the club but not the sort of franchise-altering move that a long-term pact for Bryant, Kyle Schwarber, Addison Russell or any of the team’s other young talents would have been.
Bryant’s agent, Scott Boras, has a reputation for eschewing contract extensions and pushing his clients toward free agency — long-term deals for Carlos Gonzalez with the Rockies and Stephen Strasburg with the Nationals notwithstanding — though he spoke to Verducci at length about that perception and about extensions in general.
“My first rule [on extension offers] is that I tell the player, ‘Do not look at the team as if they’re trying to steal you. They’ve made the decision that is the right decision. The question is, What is the investment worth? What is the value?'” Boras explains to Verducci. In the case of Bryant, Boras adds that he was on the same page with Cubs president of baseball operations in terms of Bryant’s fit on the team but not when it came to appropriately valuing that fit.
Perhaps most interesting in the column is that Boras paints Epstein as somewhat of a tough negotiator. While Boras doesn’t indicate any ill will toward the iconic executive, he suggests to Verducci that there was never much progress when discussing Jacoby Ellsbury during Epstein’s days as GM of the Red Sox, where Ellsbury starred for the first seven seasons of his career. Ellsbury went year-to-year through the arbitration process and ultimately signed with the Yankees on a seven-year, $153MM contract as a free agent.
“Theo does not settle on certain things,” says Boras. “He offers a very limited range. You’ve got to give up an option year, a free agent year and he can move you whenever he wants to move you.”
While it’s hard to argue with the results for Epstein, who in the past 15 years has broken two of the three longest World Series droughts in baseball (World Series wins with the Red Sox in 2004 and 2007 and, of course, with the Cubs last year), those words may nonetheless be discouraging for Cubs fans. That’s due not only to the fact that Boras represents Bryant but also due to the fact that his company represents Russell and Jake Arrieta. The lack of traction in Arrieta extension talks has been an oft-covered topic here at MLBTR, and Boras’ comments certainly don’t paint a promising picture when it comes to securing long-term deals with either Bryant or Russell. While Arrieta is a free agent at the end of the current season, both Bryant and Russell are controllable through the 2021 season.
That leaves ample time for the Cubs to strike a deal with either Bryant or Russell, but arbitration is also looming for each player. Both entered the season just days (or, in Bryant’s case, a singular day) shy of two years of Major League service time, meaning each will be eligible for arbitration as a Super Two player next offseason. And it’s worth noting that it’s almost certainly not an accident that the pair fell just days shy of qualifying for free agency a year earlier, though the Cubs are hardly the only team to leverage the current service time structure in order to delay free agency by a full year.
In Bryant’s case, the NL Rookie of the Year Award and NL MVP that are already under his belt could very well allow him to topple Ryan Howard’s longstanding record of $10MM for a first-time arbitration player. Howard, much like Bryant, had a Rookie of the Year and an MVP on his record when he received that staggering sum. Russell’s earning capacity is understandably lower, though as a shortstop that could hit arbitration with multiple 20-homer seasons already in his back pocket, he should be paid handsomely over his four years of eligibility.
As Verducci suggested in reporting that Indians star Francisco Lindor turned down an extension offer of “around $100 million” within this same column (more on that decision here), the increasingly strong market for top-tier free agents is likely to continue pushing forward the price for extending top-tier young players such as Bryant or Lindor. Verducci points out that the 2018-19 free agent class stands to be headlined by a pair of players (Bryce Harper and Manny Machado) that could sign contracts which eclipse Giancarlo Stanton’s current 13-year, $325MM record and could crack the $400MM barrier. And at this point, with Bryant just a year from reaching what could be a record-setting arbitration payday, I’d imagine that any offer that does not top Stanton would be a non-starter in extension talks.
Boras, unsurprisingly, had plenty to say on the notion of escalating free agent prices as well. After revealing that former client Alex Rodriguez turned down a $120MM extension offer from the Mariners before signing a then-record-setting $240MM contract with the Rangers all the way back in 2001, Boras tells Verducci:
“Rule number one in baseball is that no team has ever gone broke. Rule number two is that there’s never been an owner who didn’t make money when he sold the team. And rule number three is that there are no recessions in baseball.”
Suffice it to say, Verducci’s full column qualifies as a must-read not only for those who follow the Cubs and Indians but for all fans. The column is stuffed with quotes from Boras, other agents and executives about the rapidly escalating valuation of players and provides a good idea of what could be in store for baseball’s financial landscape.
legit1213
Cubs stole 1 year of FA from Bryant in 2015 by manipulating his service time. That probably sent a yucky message to his teammates too. Ricketts, dont exploit your players to save a nickel and then expect them to remain loyal to the organization.
redsfan48
I disagree. They had a legitimate reason to give him a little extra minor league seasoning. Stealing a FA year by manipulating service time would be more like what the Marlins did with Marcell Ozuna.
alexgordonbeckham
They held him down the extra time and Boras was very vocal about how displeased he was then. Do you think that wouldn’t come up when discussing a deal? Cubs aren’t getting a team-friendly deal from Bryant.
Robertowannabe
Every team does the same thing with every player. The Cubs “stole” nothing from Bryant. Even if they brought Bryant up to start the season in 2015 and pay him well above what they are paying him now, they would not get a dime in a discount in negotiations with Bryant and Boros (or any other agent that Bryant may employ) in the future. Nor should they. The process where service time is calculated was agreed upon by the players association in the CBA’s Just as every player would use the CBA to their fullest advantage, the ball clubs would do the same. I would expect nothing different from either side.
alexgordonbeckham
And if you re-read my comment, you will realize I didn’t accuse the Cubs of doing anything wrong.
Robertowannabe
I was referring to legit123’s “stole” assertion. Sorry for the confusion the rest of the comment goes towards your assertion that the Cubs maneuver cost them in negotiations. I contend that it would not have made any difference had they brought up Bryant to begin 2015 and gave him his FA status a year sooner. Boros would not have had that excuse to use but he still would not have pushed Bryant to sign long term now. He never does. He tries to get his clients maximum value for the life of their career. He is a good agent and that is what good agents do.
alexgordonbeckham
He can bring up that situation as leverage.
nysoxsam
Stealing a year is if it were to come out that a team violated the MLBPA agreement. Agents work within the rules to maximize value and teams do the same to maximize controlled service time. of course you run the risk of losing a player. Does anyone really think Jason Veritek wouldn’t have signed elsewhere towards the end of his playing days if there was more $$$ out there?
bfolls
No boras client is getting a team friendly deal. That’s why Scott boras is their agent.
lyle
I would argue that Carlos Gomez 3year 24milliion deal that he signed with the Brewers was a nice team friendly deal signed by a Boras client.
JKB 2
Are you kidding me with this B.S. How Boras is not allowing Bryant to sign a team friendly deal because of that? So if the Cubs did not do that then you are saying Boras and Bryant would be taking a discount huh? Grow up and get a clue about how things work
JKB 2
Oh Alexgordon you are so wrong if you think that situation gives him leverage? How do you even claim to know anything about baseball
hyraxwithaflamethrower
You really think they would have gotten a team-friendly deal from Boras if they’d brought him up to start the season? They’d be in the same position, except they’d have to pay tons of money a year earlier. Plus, people are talking about the Cubs “stealing” a year. They acted within their rights according to an agreement with the MLBPA. If Bryant doesn’t like it, he can bring it up to the union for the next round of bargaining.
Logjammer D"Baggagecling
Its also the reason why he’s a greedy talentless guy. If boras is smart he tells Bryant to sign long term with the cubs. Chemistry with everyone on that team is.better than any other team. No matter what he’s gonna get paid. The cubs will spare no expense to keep bryant rizzo baez Schwarber Contreras (hopefully happ as well) if they.are smart.and we know Theo is nothing.short.of a genius theyll do everything possible to keep that core together for 10-15. They spent 250k on 1908 rings for every cubs employees plus 3 hof players too. Thats a huge.chunk of cheese. Doubt they would skim off any for the players
Priggs89
That’s such garbage. The didn’t have a “legitimate reason” other than they wanted him for an extra year on the cheap (and I don’t blame them one bit). He had a 1.036 OPS in 70 AAA games in 2014 (1.160 in 68 AA games). Those 7 games of “extra minor league seasoning,” where he OPS’ed 1.042, were 100% about free agency.
petrie000
well, i mean, Mike Olt was their second best hitter in spring training of 2015 and he also played 3b. Then got hurt a week into the season.
convenient? highly. but not indefensible.
schellis 2
I would agree with this if he wasn’t called up immediately when he passed it
alexgordonbeckham
Also a good point.
Priggs89
Exactly. If you don’t want to be transparent about it, that’s fine. But at least try not to make it so obvious!
alexgordonbeckham
Yeah do it like a week later haha
37santobanks
MIke Olt’s injury happened at literally the best possible time for everyone in the Cubs organization not named Mike Olt.
AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres
Why would they need to not make it obvious? What they did was perfectly legal as per the CBA and it’s what everyone does.
Priggs89
I didn’t say they would need to not make it obvious. I said if they didn’t want to be transparent about it, they shouldn’t make it so obvious. You don’t need to lie and say that he needs “extra seasoning” for 7 games (aka 1 day after the cutoff) when everyone with a brain knows exactly what you’re doing.
Again, I do not disagree with what they did, and I do not think they did anything wrong. I just think that anyone who believes they did it for any other reason than the extra year is delusional and/or a gigantic Cubs homer.
JKB 2
Well Mike Olt got hurt at that time and was out for months so there!
bigkempin
They did? He was hitting .321/.364/.679 before they brought him up. They literally waiting until 1 day after the cut off to bring him up. Had they called him up 1 day earlier they would’ve lost 1 year of team control. That is no different than what MIA did with Ozuna. They sent him down so he would lose ML service time. CHI waited until Bryant’s service time threshold had passed.
AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres
“They had a legitimate reason to give him a little extra minor league seasoning.”
Yeah. That explains why they called him up the first day they could without losing a year of service time.
SofaKingCool1
You’re kidding, right?
The Cubbies left Bryant in the minors to begin the 2015 season, with the rationale that he needed to work on his defense….and brought him up SEVEN GAMES LATER, not-coincidentally ONE DAY after he would have gotten credit for an entire season of service.
They CLEARLY manipulated his service time, and to imply otherwise is laughable….and I ain’t even a Cubs fan.
petrie000
they brought him up when they lost their 3b to injury. Mike Olt also was their second best hitter in spring training behind Kris Bryant just the month prior
So yeah, for all that to be premeditated, Theo’s even more of a wizard than people give him credit for
AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres
Yep. That’s TOTALLY why they called Bryant up when they did
Kayrall
‘Stole’ implies that they did something illegal (in this case according to the CBA.)
mack22 2
No “Stole” is perception, and with Boras it won’t work out well for the Cubs
Robertowannabe
As I said above, even if they brought up Bryant to start 2015 and not gained an extra year of time before Bryant gained free agency, it would not work out any differently for the Cubs other than a lost year roster time Bryant and Boros would not give any sort of discount for that extra year nor should they.. Do you really think that Boros would have thanked the Cubs for the gesture of granting FA status a year sooner and demand a penny less?
BB_dont_R
It won’t? Do you think Boston is glad the Yankees are paying Jacoby what they are paying him and they don’t have to? Do you think the Rangers would take a little offense to Boras’s 3 rules advice to his clients considering what A-rods contract did to their franchise? If I was a Cubs fan I would be very happy to hear the regard that Boras has about Theo’s negotiations. If agents want to use terms like “stealing a year” in regards to super 2 status, then maybe front offices should start reassuring fans that they hold those players in such high regard that they want to insure the fans that the team intends to maximize their rights to that kind of player.
nysoxsam
Why is it Boras and other agents are shrewd wheras owners and GMs are manipulative? if there was anything illegal done, grievances would have been filed long ago. GMs get paid to best manage their roster short and long term. judge them over time.
tedmorgan
Agree with your sentiments, although Boras actually did file a grievance on Bryant’s behalf for how the Cubs managed his service time. Can’t seem to find the result of that grievance, but nothing appears to have come of it. Boras was basically trying to insert himself as an agent of change (sorry, not trying to pun there) for the way MLB/MLBPA treats service time, specifically regarding salaries and eligibility.
JKB 2
Oh really dummy. Well it may not work out well for Bryant either. He is the face of the franchise that had not won in 108 years and is a god here with the number 1 selling jersey etc. go take a few extra bucks and go play for the Marlins in a few years. That will teach the Cubs a lesson. Haha. You kidding me. See how many endorsements he loses or marketing dollars when not connected to the Cubs. Go ahead.
NickinAtl
how ridiculous to accuse Ricketts of stealing when was operating within rules negotiated with the union thugs.
themed
Exactly! He’ll never be a cub for life.
padresfan
Stole one year?
Common dude
They did the right thing
Keep him as long as possible bc he will walk
peicub
It had little to do with money and everything to do with insuring Bryant was a Cub at least that one additional year. Otherwise he has the option of leaving a year earlier via free agency. And whether Cubs held him back or not, they weren’t getting any discounts from Boras.
tedmorgan
Agree. The Cubs decision wasn’t financially driven (at least not inherently). Barring an extension, Bryant’s probably going to set arbitration records and feasibly could earn $25-30M in his 4th year of arbitration (the 7th year of team control secured by the Cubs). That’s a bit less than his expected annual salary in FA (unless Harper/Machado blow up the market in 2018-19), but the Cubs FO’s primary goal was to guarantee he’d spend his 7th year in a Cubs uniform (at a reasonably predictable cost). Once he hits FA (esp. w/Boras), anything’s possible.
padresfan
If they want to mess with his service time they will send him up and down for the next three years
Toksoon
I disagree both sides understand the business of baseball
bfolls
And the Reds just did to winker. It happens all of the time. It’s part of the CBA. If the players don’t like it, they should have focused more on service time during the recent CBA negotiations.
amishthunderak
Business men making business decisions on sides with fans on the outside thinking they are valued for more than the bottom line.
petrie000
and Bryant tried to ‘steal’ an overslot signing bonus from the Cubs after he got drafted…. yet the Cubs don’t seem to be holding that against him. So the nickle and diming clearly cuts both ways.
Cubs also paid Bryant twice what they actually had to for this season and gave a lot of other pre-arbitration players hefty raises they weren’t required to under the CBA. So i’m pretty sure the players are mostly pretty happy with Ricketts.
JKB 2
Save a nickel? That extra year the Cubs “stole” may be worth $40 million by then and another championship in that year.
You are clueless if you think it sent a “yucky” message to anyone. Its called business. You think any player is turning down an extension from the Cubs because of a “yucky” message?
The dumbest thing to do would have been to do what you suggest. To not hold Bryant back for what amounted to 8 games. Boy some people know nothing about baseball but comment anyway?
If the Cubs did not do it that would be a “yucky” message to their fans!!
desertbull
They did not steal anything. The players negotiated those rules in their collective bargaining agreement.
schellis 2
I’m sure the offer of some 100 to 150 million dollar contract for the next 6-7 years will make up for that
I’ll be shocked if there is any future major impact type that doesn’t have their service time screwed with just enough to get that extra year. Teams would be foolish not to.
alexgordonbeckham
Yeah every team does it. I’m still shocked the Rangers didn’t do that with Mazara last year.
start_wearing_purple
Prepare for the “he must be greedy” comments.
Robertowannabe
Well, Boros is, but that is to be expected. Agents are supposed to be greedy. The more they make for the clients means more money for the agents. A good agent will try to maximize what the client can be paid based upon where the client wants to play. If the player does not care where they play, highest bidder gets the player. If the player picks 4 or 5 teams they want to play for, the player goes to the combination of the highest bidder and where the bids come in from the teams that the player wants to play for. Agent goes for the best deal based on the parameters set by the player.
jtvincent
clubs are foolish to give players long term deals and players are even more foolish not to take the money and run. How many big deals work out? very few. how many guys lose big money waiting and get hurt? plenty. If you want value keep them till the last year and ship them out.
Mattimeo09
We’re talking about the highest tier of players here with Kris Bryant and Francisco Lindor. Not prospects or bounce back candidates but legitimate stars.
By the way this 2021-2022 free agent class is going to be more insane than the upcoming 2018-2019. Lindor, Bryant, Correa, and that’s just off the top of my head
bbatardo
I am curious what the Cubs offer was.. in reality Bryant has no incentive to sign a deal now. Unlike a pitcher who is 1 injury away from being a star.. position players have less risk.
alexgordonbeckham
If he were to sign one, he would likely just be guaranteeing his arbitration years. Likely wouldn’t give up any free agent time.
Jockstrapper
And look at how the Ellsbury deal turned out for the Yankees! Yeesh.
kerplunk905
“While it’s hard to argue with the results for Epstein, who in the past 15 years has broken the two longest World Series droughts in baseball (twice with the Red Sox in 2004 and 2007 and, of course, with the Cubs last year)”.
No, those were not the two longest droughts. The Red Sox drought was the 3rd longest. Not that as White Sox fan we are not proud of our 88 year drought we had, but last I checked that was more than Boston’s 86 year drought.
themed
Long term results are still a mystery. Check back and see if the can even have a 10 year run at competing every year.
mike156
There’s a yin and yang to this. The teams have tremendous leverage because of service time control and MLB minimum salaries when the players are younger. Once a talented player gets to a point where he’s in arbitration, the leverage gradually moves in the other direction, because while the money is not as much as they would get as a FA, it’s still more money than most of us will ever see in our lives. Boras seems to take the position in most of his negotiations that an extension should be nearing fair-market free agent value. That’s not irrational, but doesn’t leave the team much incentive beyond buying out the risk that the bidding would get nuts. Whether Boras is accurately describing Epstein, it doesn’t hurt for Epstein to have a reputation as a hard-bargainer..
sfjackcoke
The CBA is the CBA those are the work rules. The MLBPA thought so much of what happened to Bryant they didn’t *fix* that in the just signed CBA. MLB front offices are now the smartest guys in the room, the MLBPA just agreed to a the closest thing to a salary cap. We’ve seen back to back free agent years disappoint many a veteran player. Bryant will be a FA following the 2021 season and similar to this season as the current CBA is expiring. As a super 2 he gets an extra arb year and it will serve him well but arbitration awards are 1 year non guaranteed deals. I presume he is carrying some form of long term disability insurance policy.
My guess is after his 1st time thru arbitration might help with the starting point for his remaining control years. If a long-term contract requires Bryant give 1 FA year + 1 option year, Bryant then becomes a FA going into his age 32 season. At 6-5, I wonder how he ages, already a tall 3rd baseman, how does he fill out, can he stay at 3rd base or at least LF or does he become a 1st baseman only? If he’s a max $ guy he will go FA route starting with his age 30 season the Cubs benefiting of having his prime years on 1yr deals.
User 4245925809
Of course pre Boras there was a time when families owned teams also and not corporations which so many of the so called enlightened new generation seems to despise so much.
Those families were forced to sell teams that had been kept for sometimes multiple decades because of losses. Something that cannot be absorbed and can lead to bankruptcy, then what would Boras care anyway about something not personally affecting himself, or one of his ‘boys” anyway? This all happened well before he joined the shell game.
Same with forcing out Charlie “O”, Kaufman and more. Boras and his personal greed machine got.. And gets more words of support than those owners ever received.
lesterdnightfly
Nobody forced out Ewing Kauffman. He passed away and his wife sold the team to David “Sling Nickels Like They Were Manhole Covers” Glass.
James7430
What I find ironic is that when a team manipulates a service time clock to benefit the team, which I don’t necessarily disagree with, players and agents are up in arms.
However, when a player and agent cash in on a nice contract and the player flops, it’s no big deal and they like to cite the CBA as justification.
I’m all for someone getting their payday, but the bottom line is that these players are getting paid millions of dollars to play a game over a short time span in comparison to what the average American worker has to do. And they make ten, twenty, or a hundred times more money.
Good for them and all, but whenever I hear comments about how they “deserve” this or that, or when they’re mad because they “only” made this or that in their arbitration years it makes me shake my head. Be grateful for what you have. It’s a helluva lot more than most others have.
jaysfan1988
Do us all a favor and don’t compare world class athletes who drive the revenue of a $10 billion industry to “average american workers.”
citizen
you sound like an overpaid injured ballplayer.
jaysfan1988
You sound like an Applebee’s manager.
Bring back the half-price happy hour apps please.
James7430
Wow. You’re a real douche.
chesteraarthur
Ew. Just close all applebees. Fridays has unlimited apps for $10, go there.
AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres
For real. Why do Cubs fans think they can extend whoever they want? I caught Hell on here for saying Aroldis Chapman wouldn’t even consider an extension and I was right on the money about that. After the 2021 season, Kris Bryant goes to the highest bidder.
padresfan
Yup
Could be the Yankees
Could be the doyuers
Could be the nationals
Could be anyone
Djones246890
As a Cubs fan, I agree. I like Kris Bryant. Really do. However, the kid needs to work on not striking out as much, and “clutch” isn’t exactly a word that comes to mind when I think of him. I truly think Rizzo is much more valuable.
With that said, the Cubs really are not the kind of team that’s going to be dishing out 6 year $240 million dollar contracts (which is probably what he’ll command), for 28 year old players — the age he’ll be in 2021.
They’ll have one of the kids ready to go again, and lock him up for $4 million per year for 6 years.
Just enjoy the ride, fellow Cubs fans! Winning is winning.
citizen
elsbury hasnt been the same as the player was in boston. howard was a 7 year wasted contract. why overpay bryant now?
TheMichigan
So you can buy out his development years and his prime years. Howard and Ellsbury were signed well into their primes and have since hit massive declines. Do you even contract?
julyn82001
Got to hand it to some attorneys… Boras is all in about top players and the money he makes when representing those players…
darkstar61
“Rule number one in baseball is that no team has ever gone broke. Rule number two is that there’s never been an owner who didn’t make money when he sold the team. And rule number three is that there are no recessions in baseball.” – Scott Boras
His “rules” are absolute bull
To his #1 – Yes, teams have gone broke. The Seattle Pilots instantly comes to mind as one of the more infamous examples, but the mid-90s Orioles and Rangers of a few year back both represent more recent cases. (Boars should know a little about that last one too, as his A-Rod contract was a big chunk of why Tex did go bankrupt – the Rangers still even owed him about 30 million they didn’t have when they filed chapter 11)
To his #2 – That Rangers issue is a perfect example of an owner not making money when he sold a team either, as the team had roughly 575 million in dept at the time of the bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court ordered the team be publicly auctioned off, with the Ryan group buying it for the cost of the debts; 575 million. Hicks pocketed nothing after having paid 250 million to buy the club in the first place.
To his #3 – As far as his nonsense regarding recessions and Baseball this scientific paper shows otherwise
uwlax.edu/urc/JUR-online/PDF/2014/Lisiecki.Welton.…
Boras is flat out lying to manipulate public opinion in an attempt to create leverage for him to better line his own pockets with. He’s pushing populist nonsense hoping the public will stay ill-informed and instead go off emotion, coming to a lazy “owners are evil” conclusion. In the end, we the fans are the only ones who lose as we will eventually pick up the added tab thru higher costs of following the sport.
User 4245925809
Agree completely. It was and is his to be followed rules set that he wants applied.. Just like he his fake news folders made up regarding players represented following FA every year that is distributed to each team amplifying accomplishments and burying poor numbers.
We used to only think Marvin Miller was bad decades back, this guy is the one who should be stonewalled out, not Miller as some teams attempted.
There are no more family owned teams left when at one time half + were. All are corporations, or large partnerships. Yawkey’s, Griffith, which never really had lots of money in Twin Cities long gone.
It’s as you stated.. Teams moved around because they were losing.. Think that’s why Oakland does not want out?? Tampa Bay also? Pilots went broke when salaries were dirt cheap, Philly A’s high tailed it with Charlie “O” for greener pastures..
Boras is a wrecking ball. Some (many) fail to see it.
jay13
Does it really matter… In the end the Cubs will find a way to meet the price. Remember… In Theo, you trust.
Djones246890
Of course they got nowhere. Scott Boras is his agent. They’ll lock him up eventually, but it’ll cost them.
hyraxwithaflamethrower
Too much riding on his being connected to the first Cubs pennant in a century for him not to re-sign. Endorsement dollars would disappear pretty quickly. Plus, where is he going to go that can both afford him and is built to contend with a bunch of young players for the next six or seven years? That’s a huge window that few players ever get to enjoy.
Logjammer D"Baggagecling
Its worth every penny. 270 or 300 mil whatever the cost pay that man. Harper just got 21.6 mil for 2018. Bryant should be close to that over higher. Thats a massive raise.
Logjammer D"Baggagecling
Gotta do eveeything possible to lock.up that core of young players. Bryant Russell Schwarber rizzo(extend him further) Contreras. Bryant is getting 270mil+ no matter what. Get it done now before boras pries him away from Chicago.