FEB. 8: Park has been placed on waivers, per Mike Berardino of the St. Paul Pioneer Press (on Twitter), so he won’t be traded.
FEB. 3, 1:17pm: La Velle E. Neal III of the Minneapolis Star Tribune tweets that the expectation is that Park will clear waivers due to the remaining salary on his contract and report to Spring Training as a non-roster invite. Mike Berardino of the St. Paul Pioneer Press writes that there’s no plan from Park’s camp to return to Korea.
11:11am: In a fairly surprising move, the Twins announced that they’ve designated first baseman Byung Ho Park for assignment in order to clear a spot on the 40-man roster for right-hander Matt Belisle, whose one-year deal with the team is now official.
Park’s DFA comes just one year into a four-year, $12MM contract signed with Minnesota last winter (which came on top of a $12.85MM posting fee paid by the Twins to acquire negotiation rights with the former KBO slugger). He’s still guaranteed $9.25MM over the life of the next three seasons, so there’s a good chance that Park will clear waivers if the Twins go that route. At that point, he’s be able to work on his swing in Triple-A and potentially return at some point in 2017.
The 30-year-old Park arrived in Minnesota with lofty expectations after blasting a combined 105 home runs in his final two KBO seasons. While Park’s power was as advertised — he homered 12 times and posted a .219 ISO in 244 plate appearances — strikeouts also proved to be a problem, as he punched out in 32.8 percent of his plate appearances.
Overall, Park posted a disappointing .191/.275/.409 batting line with the Twins, although it’s certainly worth noting that he ultimately proved to have a wrist injury that required surgical repair. And, Park did bat .257/.339/.578 with nine homers through his first 124 plate appearances in Minnesota (albeit with 38 strikeouts) in addition to showing well in a number of Statcast categories, including exit velocity and barreled balls (as recently examined by Fangraphs’ Travis Sawchik).
The Twins could also explore trade scenarios involving Park. While he’s unlikely to carry significant value given his poor debut season, a team looking to acquire a right-handed bat at first base/DH could consider Park a reasonable roll of the dice. He’s controlled for three years at what figures to be a comparable price to the one Mike Napoli will command in free agency, so there’s certainly a degree of financial upside present, as one can only assume that the cost of acquisition would be low at this juncture.
Further expounding upon that point, the Twins themselves have been a rumored landing spot for Napoli in recent weeks, and jettisoning Park from the 40-man roster creates one potential avenue of adding a more veteran right-handed bat to the picture in Minnesota.
Tanner Larson
So what is happens to him now?
angelsinthetroutfield
He’s a pretty affordable power source. Wouldn’t be shocked to see him claimed. Miami seems like a fit. Bour needs a right handed platoon mate.
SimplyAmazin91
I don’t think Miami is going to want to take on his salary. However, on paper he is a good fit for the Fish.
angelsinthetroutfield
$9m over 3yrs is cheap. If he’s healthy he’s comparable to Carter (who will probably get $5-7m alone)
lowtalker1
It’s not being healthy is a weaker vs of power compared to the Brewers guys
Miami is more of a pitchers park
Dude need serious work
clrrogers 2
The other 29 teams (in order of last year’s standings, last to first, and beginning with all of the AL teams) will have a chance to claim him, which of course means they’d also be responsible for paying him the remaining $9.75 million over the next 3 years. If nobody snatches him up, he remains property of the Twins, and they can then send him to the minor leagues (and the Twins would still be on the hook for the remaining $9.75 million that he is owed).
twins33
I believe there are no “same league” first waivers in the offseason. I looked it up earlier for something else and I think it’s by record only.
bleacherbum
You are correct, same league only applies during the regular season. Waivers in the offseason are the order of worst to first. Twins, Reds, Padres, Rays, Braves are the top 5 but with the twins designating Park it leaves the Reds wit first dibs. A little over 3 million a year with the power potential of this guy could be a nice get for someone.
clrrogers 2
Good to know. Thanks!
cplovespie
Lack of Faith? Seems like Park will start the season in AAA?
KCelts
Probably unless they trade him or some team claims him. With his contract, I honestly doubt either scenario happens.
crazysull
Rangers maybe?
JA L.
This is a surprise. Makes me wonder if something else is close to being done.
crazysull
I guess they have more faith in Sano, Varges, Pulka and Kepler to split time at DH and their other positions.
bluejayssweep
why would anyone want him? go and sign chris carter… WAY BETTER THEN THIS DUDE
lonleylibertarian
And Carter will cost at least 4 times as much…
Think this is designed to smoke out any interested parties and try for a trade…..
Wanted to Pirates to sign him last year = hate Jaso…
Maybe he gets a shot with them…
Dookie Howser, MD
I don’t think off season waivers are revocable, are they?
schellis 2
Doubt that the Pirates take on even that contract with Bell ready to go at 1B.
davbee
Carter will probably sign for one year around $5 million. Park is owed $9.75 million over three. Please explain how that is “four times as much.”
stymeedone
Carter was DFAd by the Brewers because he was expected to make more than 8MM in arb. Doubt he will get a raise from last year’s salary after being cut.
jakem59
Carter wasn’t designated he was non-tendered.
davbee
Carter made $2.5 million. He’ll get a raise. Heck, even Shelby Miller got a raise.
buccos21
Pirates could I mean they did bid for him…..
mp9
would be a great combination with kang!!
MatthewBaltimore23
Buying Ho and Jung Ho!
MatthewBaltimore23
* Byung
twins33
Surprised by the DFA, but there is a 1B/DH logjam right now. I would have taken off Danny Santana first though.
I pictured Park to start in AAA on a “prove it” option, but this works too. Wouldn’t be surprised if he’s claimed but also wouldn’t be surprised if he isn’t. Depends on if someone wants to take the gamble on the contract. The contract isn’t large in general, but large compared to what he did so far (injury is at fault too).
A'sfaninUK
Oakland looks a lock to grab him – they currently have a vacancy at DH
McGlynnandjuice
I thought Canha or Healy would fill that spot
gaertnerj
If no one has signed Cris Carter who’d want to waste a space on park…
twins33
I agree. No one wants Napoli and Carter yet, so I guess I’d have a hard time believing someone would want Park.
Park would probably be cheaper no matter what, but so far the other two have proven to be better players (get on base more, probably hit for more power). It’s a small sample size on Park so I admit that’s probably not a fair comparison. I just don’t see his upside being to the level of Napoli or Carter so he’d be a cheaper and worse player in my eyes.
A'sfaninUK
The “no one wants” mentality really flies in the face of how free agency actually works. Please don’t use language like that, these players are not all groveling for work, they are picking and choosing who they want to play for.
twins33
I never said anyone was groveling so you might want to stop putting words in my mouth/fingers.
So far, they’re unemployed. I think the majority of teams would want Napoli or Carter over Park due to track record. The only benefit of Park over those guys is contract price per year. I think those two will sign for more than a 3m deal. I don’t think Park’s upside is Carter or Napoli level.
jakem59
Because he’s cheaper than either one, younger than Napoli, has options available, and can be controlled for longer than both.
PBABowler27
Wouldn’t be entirely surprised to see Boston claim him, and then designate Selsky. Not likely, but you never know.
SamFuldsFive
Another failed Korean “star” already eh? Teams should stop paying these scrubs money based off fungo league stats.
Priggs89
It’s 3mil/year for the chance to strike gold. Not much risk in that…
Cam
They are relatively low value deals for wildcards. Throwing $12mil at a KBO player isn’t an issue.
Just think, Josh Hamilton’s contract is worth $113mil more.
A'sfaninUK
Wow, you need to grow up.
BoldyMinnesota
Hes had 200 plate appearances. You cant say hes failed yet
Joseph Anderson
No surprise. These guys aren’t use to seeing good pitching. KBO pitching is about equal to double A maybe triple A with the occasional #4 starter in MLB.
Dookie Howser, MD
If a guy hit 50+ HRs in AA, he would be a top 10 prospect.
McGlynnandjuice
Yeah if any player hit 40 homers with a 1.000 ops in AAA they’d for sure be a top prospect.
chesteraarthur
not if they were 30
McGlynnandjuice
Fair enough
crazysull
Santana is valuable to the team because he is a utility player.
twins33
A utility player who isn’t good at any position he plays. Just because a player can stand at a position doesn’t mean he can play it. Has speed, but can’t get on base. Strikes out too much. No power, which is expected.
When you’re bad at everything, you’re basically useless.
agentx
…see also, Michael Martinez.
Senioreditor
Why didn’t Minnesota try to package him with Dozier and send him to LA?
twins33
Dodgers don’t need a 1B? They have A-Gon and Bellinger. Could have been a platoon with A-Gon, but Park has yet to prove he can hit lefties.
Makes zero sense for the Dodgers.
Senioreditor
But they probably would have taken him to get Dozier and DFA’d him. I’m thinking from the Twins perspective. They could have shed 9 mil and received 2 prospects.
twins33
Sure, the Twins could include any bad or unknown player, but that doesn’t mean it gets them a better deal.
It’s not like adding park was going to get the Dodgers to give up Verdugo or Buehler. It makes zero sense for the Dodgers in every way and the Twins don’t have a money problem so it’s not like they have to get rid of Park’s contract.
Steve Adams
The Dodgers didn’t want to give two prospects for Dozier straight up, let alone for Dozier and a $10MM cost they’d be eating. They’re largely done operating like that, it seems, as they’re trying to manage their long-term payroll and avoid dead-money commitments.
Besides, designating Park isn’t a clear indicator that the Twins want him gone. They may simply believe that he’ll clear waivers, thus giving them a 40-man spot without losing anyone from the organization.
Senioreditor
There’s no evidence that they wouldn’t give 2 prospects for Dozier. They just wouldn’t give the 2 Minnesota wanted. My guess is a common ground could have been reached (lesser second prospect) had they absorbed Parks contract.
twins33
Some of the tweets by national reporters have implied it would have been a straight up deal. We may never know for sure, but that’s what those tweets have implied. They could be way off.
We know that the Twins wanted three guys. I think they would have settled for two, depending on who the other guy would have been.
A lot of people are pointing to the fact that Forsythe and Dozier have put up similar value the last two years. If that’s all the Dodgers were looking at too, then it wouldn’t be surprising if it was DeLeon only as that’s all it took for Forsythe.
I’m not sure it was a straight up deal, seems hard to believe, but if it was DeLeon plus the 50th best Dodgers prospect then it was basically a straight up deal anyway.
I still don’t see how getting the Dodgers to take a 9M player who hasn’t proven anything means the Twins would have received more or a better prospect. Doesn’t make any sense to me. It would make sense if it was someone more worth it (Buxton etc, which would obviously be nuts).
If the Twins took Kazmir or someone like that, I could see the Dodgers adding more because the Dodgers payroll would drop.
Mill City Mavs
good points. I thought the exact same scenario but instead of Kazmir, I was thinking Ethier. Contract year with a heavy rate at 17M, and it would open up the possibility of the Twins being able to add one of their young OF’s not named Buxton to the mix and bring in a player that they probably actually wanted in Alvarez (SP) or Bellinger (1B).. Obviously the Dodgers wanted more than Dozier if those names were being dropped in and rightfully so. And obviously the Twins weren’t going to settle for a mid rotation maybe with a questionable arm for Dozier straight up. It was always De Leon plus at least one up here in MN so I thought the Dodgers could drop 17M off the books from a guy they aren’t going to resign anyway to get Dozier, Rosario OR Kepler, and maybe one more small piece if that wasn’t enough for De Leon, Ethier, Alvarez OR Bellinger. People also have to keep in mind with all the things being said about this trade scenario is that no one really wanted De Leon that much up here. Yes an upgrade but not for the face of your franchise on a cheap as hell deal. When Dozier’s contract is up, the Twins will be contending again. If he isn’t out by the allstar break this year I see an extension coming after 2018. Kudos to Falvey for staying true to his word that they would need to be overwhelmed to move Dozier.
sss847
he might clear given the dry market for sluggers this offseason. would like to see the sox scoop him up to compete with avi and davidson
Priggs89
Wouldn’t mind that at all
CubanRaftRider
Red Sox should pick him up if Moreland proves he can’t hit at all, he could pair with Ramirez over at first for an interesting power duo.
angieboy1984
Hope this means K. Vargas can finally get sum at bats.
maxmadsen
White Sox please! Have a spine, Rick!
nailz#4life
Let him do the bat flip and all will be fine !!
twins33
It was his choice to not do bat flips out of respect. I like a good bat flip (Jose Bautista’s was great), so it was disappointing to me.
Phillies2017
can he elect free agency?
notagain27
Can’t elect free agency on first outright unless he had it written in a contract. Twins did same thing with Nishioka from Japan and player chose to forfeit the remaining money on his contract and return to Japan.
chesteraarthur
he’s gonna clear because 3/9? interesting take…
stressfulacorn
The Twins should sign Chris Carter if Park gets picked up!
Led the NL in HR’s , Top 10 in BB’s. Seems like he could DH/1B. The average is low, but so are a lot of guys. Don’t get why this guy isn’t getting picked up. He is also 30 years old, the same as Park!
Napoli at least….
Jacob99
The new Twins FO has shown they place little value in the high strikeout/power guys. Already cut bait on Adam Brett Walker, now Park. Doubtful they’d have any interest in Carter (money aside). We shall see its that’s a good or bad approach.
stressfulacorn
Yeah the fact that power is super undervalued now, takes a bit of the fun out of the game. MN needs another Thome 🙂
davbee
Carter, 1 WAR in 2016.
stressfulacorn
that 1 WAR seems much better than Mauer’s 1 WAR, especially for the price. Can’t wait for mauer to be gone. Also Vargas/Park as a DH will both have lower than a 1 WAR. Also I think the twins have a better offense than Milwaukee, if he had another season of this you would have to think he’d be driving in more runs!
davbee
The Twins scored about 40 more runs than the Brewers playing in a league with a DH.. Their offenses are essentially equal.
YankeesBillsNets305
Hilarious picture for the post
24TheKid
I still want Seattle to pick up a right handed power bat to platoon at first but I don’t see them taking this guy.
ClancyJ
I think he’ll be claimed. This guy can hit homeruns when healthy. Which he wasn’t last year. I know we had a log jam but to get out from under 9million over 3 years, seems like how we gave up on JJ Hardy because of his 4 million dollar contract. I could see the rays picking him up and him hitting 25hrs.
twinsfan2016
We didn’t give up JJ Hardy because of a 4 million dollar contract. We gave him up because he didn’t fit the mold of Gardy/Ryan’s typical shortstop. We gave him up because he could hit the ball out of the park. Gardy always liked the all field and barely hit shortstops, (similar to what he was with the Mets in 80’s). I don’t think he will be claimed. No team will tie up multiple years of control on a guy that is so unproven.
bleacherbum
Can Park play any other position besides 1B
bleacherbum
And DH of course?
marcoL
So odds are not with Park by Twins and the market degrading him. The question is, can he against it? Only himself and good coach been watching will know. Considering his achievement and proven raw power & attitude, maybe 1/2 season= 300 ABs- more opportunity maybe worthwhile.
impactrookies
Is this David Ortiz 2.0?! Just let a pitcher go, it’s not like we’re loaded with arms we can’t replace.
biasisrelitive
who tho
tigerdoc616
$9.75M over three years is not a huge amount, the MLB average was over $4M for 2016. He may pass through waivers, but here is a guy worth taking a chance on if you have a 40 man roster spot for him.
clintwolfron
This is terrible news
jd396
I get the feeling someone will claim him. He doesn’t have to be all that good to be worth 3m.
mike156
Maybe, but it’s a $9..25M commitment in a market that just valued Carter at $3.5 for one year.
SupremeZeus
White Sox should take a flyer on him if his medical school are ok. Even though he is on waivers they should send the Twins Avi Garcia anyway.
Priggs89
Deal.
bleacherbum
I could see the Padres taking a stab at him off waivers even after extending Myers a couple weeks ago. The first base depth organizationally isn’t great
bleacherbum
They are second in the waiver Priority to claim him
marcoL
Bad year for the sink or swim type players almost seems like teams know what amped up the home runs in 2016