The Nationals have struck a one-year deal with reliever Joe Blanton, pending a physical, according to Jorge Castillo of the Washington Post (via Twitter). Blanton is slated to receive a $4MM guarantee with $1MM in available incentives, Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports tweets.
$3MM of that salary will be deferred, as Jon Heyman of Fan Rag (via Twitter) and Barry Svrluga of the Washingon Post (Twitter links) report, with $1MM payable in 2018 and the other $2MM kicked to 2019. Blanton will take home an additional $250K apiece upon reaching fifty and sixty innings, along with a nice $500K payout if he gets to seventy.
Though he’s coming off of a second consecutive season of steady bullpen production, the 36-year-old had languished on the market this offseason. When catcher Matt Wieters joined the Nats, Blanton was left as the last available name on MLBTR’s list of the top fifty free agents.
[RELATED: Updated Nationals Depth Chart]
It’s easy to see the fit in D.C., where the bullpen has remained somewhat in flux after the organization missed on closer targets Kenley Jansen and Mark Melancon. While Blanton doesn’t seem likely to factor directly into the competition for the ninth inning job, he’ll deepen the team’s late-inning corps.
It wasn’t long ago that Blanton seemed like he might be headed for retirement. His last full season as a starter came in 2013, when he scuffled to a 6.04 ERA with the Angels, and he sat out the following campaign. But the righty reemerged with the Royals in 2015, and thrived yet more upon moving to the Pirates that year in a mid-season trade.
The surprising showing of the newly minted reliever led to a $4MM deal with the Dodgers last year. That signing paid big dividends for Los Angeles, as Blanton worked to a 2.48 ERA with 9.0 K/9 against 2.9 BB/9. He carried a sturdy 80-inning workload, allowing just 55 base hits in that span.
It would be unwise to expect Blanton to continue generating a meager .240 batting average on balls put in play against him, but his other peripherals portend continued success. Though he drew far less grounders than usual (32.5% against a career average of 43.9%), Blanton tamped down the long balls that plagued him in the second half of his time working from the rotation. And he generated swinging strikes at an excellent 14.2% clip, representing an increase over his already-strong 2015 numbers (13.0%).
Beyond the ability he displayed, Blanton showed he’s still capable of carrying a heavy burden for a reliever while retaining his arm speed deep into his career. He averaged a career-best 91 mph with his fastball last year, with his slider and curve also rating as above-average offerings. While his change wasn’t as productive in 2016, Blanton’s starter’s arsenal also gives him some added flexibility. Though he surrendered free passes more frequently to the 111 lefty batters he faced than the 204 righties that came to the plate against him, Blanton held southpaw hitters to an anemic .186/.288/.258 batting line.
That’s not to say that Blanton comes without questions. He did falter in the NLCS, though he was aces for the Dodgers in their thrilling divisional series against the Nats, when he provided five scoreless innings over which he allowed just a single base knock and compiled five strikeouts against one walk. Of greater concern is his ability to continue succeeding while giving up a fair amount of hard contact (34.3%) while permitting many more flyballs (45.6%) than grounders (32.5%). And he did that while generating far fewer harmless infield pop-ups than he had in 2015 (15.2% versus 5.3%). If a few more of those flies end up in the seats — which is always possible when Nats Park heats up over the summer — then there could be some regression in store.
Regardless, it’s a solid value for the Nationals, who will add Blanton to a righty setup mix that also includes Blake Treinen, Shawn Kelley, and youngster Koda Glover. One of those three seems likely to take the closer’s job, though lefty Sammy Solis could also enter that discussion. Veteran right-handers Joe Nathan and Matt Albers now seemingly face taller odds in their bids to crack the Opening Day roster. It’s still tempting to wonder whether the organization will pursue an experienced closer before camp breaks, though the addition of Blanton likely draws down the available resources and reduces the likelihood of another significant move.
Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.
a1544
Great move. Kelly, Blanton, Treinen is an underrated back end
dodgerfan711
Not when 1 of them has to be the closer
TheMichigan
Kelly is more than capable
Travis’ Wood
Closer means nothing. A good 8th inning guy is a good 9th inning guy. I thought we were past this.
dodgerfan711
Really? Did you see the 2016 giants. You arent winning a world series with shawn kelley as your closer
vtadave
What does Shawn Kelley have to do with Santiago Casilla last year?
Travis’ Wood
Lol why not? He was one of the best relievers in baseball last year. The 2016 Giants had no one even close to as good as Kelley.
jdgoat
Yes, you easily can
dodgerfan711
Ok well dont act suprised when they cant make it past the nlds again. You need a dominate closer to win games in October. Whoever they face will be extatic shawn kelley is the closer when guys like wade davis, jansen and melancon are closing games out for the other teams in the NL
Travis’ Wood
So how did those Giants win 3 World Series without a dominant closer in 2 of them? 2012 was Romo and 2014 was Casilla. Neither of those guys are better than Kelley. You don’t know what you’re talking about.
Travis’ Wood
Plus, the Cubs won it all last year and Chapman wasn’t even close to dominant.
dodgerfan711
Dude castilla didnt close out the 3rd world series. I think it was a guy named bumgarner. And romo was an elite closer back then. But ok keep thinking shawn kelley and blanton can lead them past a team with a real closer. You really think when things are goibg bad in the 7th inning in october and you need outs in the worst way shawn kelley is gonna save the day? He was the one that allowed the dodgers to take a 4-1 lead in game 5
alexgordonbeckham
I wouldn’t say that. Dude pitched in what, all 17 games and only blew 2 leads?
Travis’ Wood
Lol what? Bumgarner closed one games all season, that is completely irrelevant. It was casilla. And I’d be more than confident in Kelley. Have you even looked at his numbers? Or are you just assuming he’s bad cause you don’t know anything about him? He’s one of the best 20 or so relievers in baseball. Go look up his stats.
blovy8
And Chapman was the guy that blew the Cubs lead before some pitcher Maddon was scared of even using in Montgomery got the last outs. Having Melancon didn’t win the Nats anything.
chesteraarthur
“You need a dominate closer to win games in October.”
“Dude castilla didnt close out the 3rd world series.”
Who closed out the games from the start of the playoffs until the end of the world series? Or are you just gonna ignore those times because they don’t fit your narrative?
“He was the one that allowed the dodgers to take a 4-1 lead in game 5”
Remember game 7 of the world series when the cubs were winning by 3 and they brought in their dominant closer? How’d he do?
Good relievers can pitch poorly and bad pitchers can pitch well.. Good pens help in the playoffs. They aren’t necessary. We’ve seen multiple teams do well in the post season without 5 deep pens of awesome relievers.
dodgerfan711
I am well aware who shawn kelley is. I cant wait to have him be the nationals closer in october if that is the case. Dodgers ate him up in the playoffs last year so 2017, nats wont have melancon to save them
floridapinstripes
It means Blanton is your set up man. You saw how that worked for the Dodgers
Travis’ Wood
So since Chapman wasn’t great in the playoffs we should just expect that again in the future? Shawn Kelley is a top tier reliever and should be expected to perform as such. Your logic is faulty and irrational.
chesteraarthur
So you didn’t want Kershaw starting in october because previously teams ate him up in the playoffs? Right? Or is basing your opinion of a player on a small sample of games a crazy idea
floridapinstripes
Ask the dodgers how Blanton was as a setup man in the playoffs last year. Might be why they and no one else signed him until the last day in February.
McGlynnandjuice
Just give it up, some people don’t think rationally
Travis’ Wood
Blanton was clearly worn down by the playoffs; Dodgers simply rode him too hard. His body of work over the last two years speaks for itself.
dodgerfan711
The postseason is changing and bullpen use is different now to somewhere even as close back as 2014. The nationals have yet to even win a playoff series , and a team that is all in needs a dominate closer. Anyone who pays attention would have second thoughts about the nats winning a title with no dominate closer especially a team that has done nothing but choke. Yes they can still trade for a closer until then but for now they dont have one. While teams are bringing in miller and jansen in the 7th inning who will the nats have to shut the door. No one they have can come in early put out a fire and still pitch until the 9th. This team is judged on october not the regular season
Travis’ Wood
So do the Red Sox have no chance to win the World Series? They don’t have a dominant closer either (and don’t tell me Kimbrel is elite. Hes barely better than Kelley, if at all). Plus you’re ignoring the fact that the Cubs won the World Series despite Chapman pitching poorly, rondon being hurt and barely pitching, Strop struggling etc. You don’t NEED anything except a good team to win in October. There is no specific blueprint. You’re blinded by recency bias.
Joseph Anderson
Chapman wasn’t used correctly in that plus he already put in a lot of work leading up to game 7. I know, that doesn’t fit your narrative……
You certainly don’t need a “stacked” bullpen but you need them all pitching good to close out games especially in the playoffs. Crazy things happen in October….
Travis’ Wood
How does that not fit my narrative? Whether he was used correctly or not is irrelevant. He wasn’t dominant, proving that you don’t need a dominant closer to win. Anyways it wasn’t just game 7 with Chapman, he had a few hiccups throughout the playoffs.
dodgerfan711
Its funny you keep mentioning chapman and it proves my point. The emphasis for a dominate arm to close out games in october made maddon overwork him. Chapman had good games last postseason, but he got overworked which lead to the stinkers. And kimbrel has a track record of being an elite closer so i am willing to say 2016 was an exception for him not the rule. Shawn kelly wont be pitching the nats through october when scherzer cant even make it past the 6th inning
Travis’ Wood
Are you incapable of making a logical argument? Chapman doesn’t help your point, it hurts it greatly. Chapman wasn’t dominant in the playoffs last year, that is a fact. It doesn’t matter whether he was overworked or not; that is an explanation for why he wasn’t dominant, not proof of needing a dominant arm to win. The Cubs won the World Series despite not having any dominant reliever, proving you do not need a dominant closer to win. Same with the 2014 Giants. And the 2012 Giants.
Scherzer can’t get past the 6th inning? What in the world are you talking about? Scherzer threw more innings last year than any pitcher not named David Price, and averaged nearly 7 innings per start.
I see that logic is not your greatest strength.
Naderball
” Dodgers Ate him up” ? They must have been starving afterwords: He struck out three of the six batters he faced, allowed 1 hit and no walks. The hit came after Dusty Baker panicked and called him in after Kelley threw only four warm pitches, a mistake Baker admitted he made and apologized for later.
Your Dodgers choke every year and their window is quickly closing. Good luck with that starting rotation.
bfolls
The Red Sox are a significantly better team than the Nationals. If the Red Sox had Werth in LF and a Lind/Zimmerman tandem at 1B, then yes, the Red Sox should worry about their bullpen. The Red Sox still should look to improve their bullpen, but they’re so loaded they don’t *need* to go out and get a high leverage arm to contend. The Nationals do, or alternatively, they should pursue offense upgrades at the deadline
dodgerfan711
You must not have watched what chapman did in game 1 of the nlcs. Without chapman the dodgers take the lead in the 8th inning and win both games in chicago and had a 3-0 serves lead. Without chapman the cubs dont make the world series. @naderball the dodgers window is closing yet they have an elite farm system. Ok there goober. And our rotation is top 3 in baseball and stats prove that. In 2012 romo was a dominate closer how you dont see that is beyond me. Oh and i said in playoff games , both of them last year scherzer couldnt get past 6 innings. The whole point of this argument is shawn kelly cant be the closer in october if the nats want a ring. They can get by fine in the regular season
Travis’ Wood
I agree that the Red Sox are better but they aren’t significantly better (Red Sox projected for 93 wins, Nationals 91 per Fangraphs). I do think the Nats could use an upgrade in LF (Angel Pagan is a good cheap option). But my point was that teams like Boston and Washington can win a World Series despite only having a few good relievers and no elite ones.
Travis’ Wood
Pointing out one game samples just makes your argument laughable. The Cubs could’ve easily made the World Series without Chapman if Rondon and Strop were healthy; they just ran out of quality arms. Chapman had a 3.45 ERA in the playoffs as a whole (not bad but far from dominant). You dont think Shawn Kelley can put up a 3.45 ERA in the playoffs this year? I certainly do.
Sergio Romo had the same fWAR in 2012 as Shawn Kelley had last year. So if you think Romo was dominant in 2012, you must also think Kelley was dominant last year. Or is that too logical for you?
Jeff Todd
Would the Dodgers have made it out of the NLDS without 5 dominant innings from Blanton? What does this prove?
dodgerfan711
Oh thats cute. Because everyone believes in fwar. Like i said the game has changed since then. The way the playoffs are ran now is completely different then 2012. Sergio romos era was also 1 run lower then Kelly in the compared seasons which is a huge difference. And pointing out 1 game sample is laughable??? Dude this is the playoffs!!! 1 game in the playoffs change everything. I know very well chapman wasnt that good, but it just took 1 game for him to make a difference with his 105 mph fastball. I know shawn kelly wont come in the 8th inning and blow guys away with a 100+ fastball
National Anthem
Stop using alternative facts to make your point because it renders your whole argument false.
Scherzer can’t make it past the 6th inning? In 2016: 34 starts – 10 with 7 complete innings, 5 with 8 innings, one complete game. That’s 20 out of 34 starts…i.e. 59%. By the way, he pitched at least 6 full innings in another 10 quality starts (30 out of 34 starts in total!).
WAH1447
Rols1026 you could have not been more wrong there has been several guys that are set up man that can’t close out the game. Those are the toughest 3 outs possible and you want your best pitcher who can handle the 9th inning role. Look a David Robertson for example he has been a decent closer but his numbers were far more superior as a set up guy. Same with dellin Betances he flat out sucked as a closer. It’s a completely different mindset pitching the 9th than any other inning
Travis’ Wood
Lol… I have nothing left to say. You just don’t get it. Arguing with people who don’t follow logic just isn’t worth my time.
Not “believing” in fWAR, using one game samples, saying Scherzer can’t get past 6 innings, ignoring the fact that the Cubs won without a dominant reliever (as did the Giants twice), implying that Kelley can’t be as good as Chapman because he doesn’t throw as hard…. you just don’t make a lick of sense.
dodgerfan711
National anthem, these arent alternative facts these are real scenerios that the nationals cant awnser. Im talking 7th inning of a playoff game which actually happend. The fire is starting runners on base and the team needs outs in the worst way. The nats dont have anyone that can come in and stop the fire which is my whole point
dodgerfan711
1 game can change everything in october and if you dont believe that you are a fool
Travis’ Wood
WAH1447 you seriously buy into that BS logic? There is no significant difference between the 8th and 9th, this has been proven.
Wade Davis went from a great setup man to a great closer. As did Melancon, Tony Watson, Jeremy Jeffress, Sam Dyson, Hector Rondon, Kelvin Herrera, Andrew Miller, Jeurys Familia, Seung Hwan Oh, Arodys Vizcaino, Ken Giles, Sean Doolittle, Ryan Madson, Brad Lidge, Cody Allen…just off the top of my head. Betances would be a great closer; he struggled last year because he was extremely worn down at the time he was promoted to closer.
Almost every single reliever was a set up man before they were a closer. You might want to rethink that opinion, because its proven that theres not difference between the 8th and 9th.
Travis’ Wood
When did I say 1 game can’t change everything? I said using a one game sample to extrapolate any meaningful data is absurd. One game samples do not indicate anything about and individual’s future performance. The playoffs are a glorified coin flip and if you don’t believe that then you’re living in a fairy tale world.
dodgerfan711
Ok this is going nowhere. I will see you in october if the nationals havent traded for a closer
pullhitter445
I don’t know which D.C. team chokes more come the playoffs, the capitals or nationals. For this year I’ll take the nationals choking. Capitals actually look like they may deliver on a trip to the finals, not sure they can win it all though. A lot of missed opportunities in D.C. Each season.
bigguccisosa300
you easily can hey ? for sure yah easily
bfolls
Until you compare it to the bullpens of the team’s they’ll run into in the playoffs. And their bullpen depth is an even bigger issue
Travis’ Wood
Kelley, trienen, Blanton, glover, solis, Perez, Romero, Gott, Grace. That’s solid depth…
bfolls
Solis is. Glover might be. But compare their bullpen depth to the Cubs or Dodgers. Half of the Cubs bullpen would be the 2nd best reliever on the nats
Travis’ Wood
Well the Cubs have an elite pen. But the Nats pen is close to as good as LA’s and probably better than the Mets Cardinals and Giants
metseventually 2
Not better than the Mets. Mets pen is sneaky good.
Travis’ Wood
It’s definitely better than the Mets especially once you consider Familia will be suspended 30-50 games.
hojostache
1. The Mets had a top 3 BP last year (check the stats).
2. They lost 1 guy from their 2016 BP, but now have Gsellman/Lugo/Wheeler to add to the mix. The first two guys were solid starters during a stretch run and Wheeler is a former top prospect who is a lotto ticket.
3. Familia + Reed were one of the top duos in the league last year for 8th/9th inning.
4. Familia might get 30 games, but given Chapman got 30 and shot a freaking gun…I don’t think 50 is a realistic option.
5. The Nats need to worry about getting out of the first round of the playoffs and I’m not sure they will with a shaky bullpen. The Mets are built to win 92-95 games, but more importantly they have depth and dominant arms to be a nightmare matchup for any club…including the Cubs.
WAH1447
That’s a huge if on the 92-95 games. If all the started stay healthy and pitch to what they are capable of then yes they can, but outside cespedes there really isn’t too much to offer. Walker and Bruce are good and Duda is basically a poor mans Chris Davis, but they probably have the 2nd worst 3 4 5 hitters in the NL east. Harper Murphy and rendon is tough. Yelich Stanton and either Bour or ozuna and freeman kemp and markakis are all easily better than the mets
hojostache
All fair points. The Mets (for once) actually have some depth, so if guys need to spend some time on the DL…they can survive. They are 6-7 quality starters deep, which makes a huge difference. The Cubs were one of the healthiest staffs last year, which helped them pile up wins. If the Mets can stay healthy, I think 95 is very doable.
As you correctly pointed out, their lineup is the bigger issue. Ces + Walker need to produce or else. One of D’Naurd/Duda need to step up, and Bruce/Conforto need to be an impact bat. The Mets (minus Bruce) did much better post-Allstar break, but they were still anemic at times. Their WC lineup was a joke….it was one of the worst lineups they put out all season…but they had half of their starters on the DL for most of the year.
Mets will win games 3-1 this year, and rarely will they be blowouts unless 3-4 guys ALL step up, and when is the last time that happened for a team?
plem24
Underrated because it’s not very good. They’re in trouble with that mess
a1544
I sense you don’t watch any of these guys pitch
Mikel Grady
As a cub fan I enjoyed Blanton in nlcs
JOCFORPREZ
typical arrogant stupid Cubs.They fan
JOCFORPREZ
You won’t repeat it trust me..Arrogant fan base on the boards.
senortaco
Doesn’t help their ninth inning role but good move. Blanton has been highly undervalued during this free agency. Nats cashing in on the guys other teams looked over.
Sundevil617
For so cheap I’m surprised the Dodgers didn’t keep him. Interesting move not to get him back but nonetheless a good move for that Nats hopefully he maintains good form and doesn’t sink.
crazysull
I think they are going to role with Nathan as the closer at least for the 1st half and try to get one at the deadline. I could possibly see them trying to get Robertson again at the deadline, or possibly even Rosenthal since he lost his role as the closer in St. Lewis and the Cards could get a decent return for him so I could see that as a possible fit as well
a1544
Why let Nathan close when you have 3 better options. That’s ridiculous
senortaco
Nathan closing would end very badly
Travis’ Wood
Nathan closing?! Lol!! He probably won’t even make the team.
norcalblue
Congratulations to the Nats and good for Joe. I’m sure this will be an excellent fit for Washington. Joe may well of had the biggest balls of any reliever I have ever watched in LA. A true warrior! He will be missed on and off the field.
JOCFORPREZ
wondering why the Dodgers couldn’t sign him for a year ? oh well.
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
That’s a good question. I’m sure they are close to their own budget but who knows. Maybe the playoffs didn’t sit well with them.
dodgerfan711
I would say it was the playoffs but romo blew 2 saves so it might something else
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
Na Romo blew what one save. But he won’t be expected to close and that Giants pen was a dumpster fire. With Romo you have a guy that should solely be used against RH.
dodgerfan711
Eh that hit zobrist got off him in game 4 was huge and worth the blown save even if he didnt get it in the scorebook. But yeah there wont be as much pressure
bfolls
When they moved Nuno, I assumed they were opening up a spot to bring back Blanton
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
No that was just a spot that needed to be opened up for Guti.
hojostache
Blanton for $4m is a STEAL. I hate that WAS signed him, but they were the most obvious choice. They still are thin in the BP…so their starters better go deep. I’m not worried about Scherzer…dude is a tank. Straus though….
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
Damn good luck to Joe. Without him the Dodgers don’t sniff the playoffs. Dodger fans know he was gassed and the pen was absolutely taxed due to all their injuries.
Senioreditor
With him, they have no chance to beat the Cubs.
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
Well that’s an ignorant comment but you do you.
Joseph Anderson
How is it ignorant? If the dodgers just won you’d have the same confidence going into the season….
Travis’ Wood
Its ignorant because the Nats would have a great chance to beat the Cubs in the playoffs (Cubs would still be favored) and Blanton does nothing but help the Nats’ chances.
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
Why is it ignornant? Without Blanton the Dodgers don’t make the playoffs. Everyone forgets how he performed against the Nats. He was gassed simple and plain. Look Blanton had two clear bad moments. But to pin the Dodgers potential pitfalls on Blanton vs the Cubs is just ridiculous. I never said anything concerning the Cubs. My response was that Blanton makes the Nats better. He made the Dodgers better. He was on of their two bullpen workhorses. He essentially makes every team better, especially if said team doesn’t incur the significant sp injuries and tax their pen.
OCTraveler
Heard that one of the reasons he moved from the Dodgers is that he still wants a shot as a starter and the Dodgers have too many better options for him to be a consideration
Travis’ Wood
That is false. He will not be starting for Washington.
Senioreditor
LA didn’t want him after the gopher balls he threw in post season.
metseventually 2
Late innings will be so fun in Washington
Travis’ Wood
How so? The Nats pen is better than the Mets pen…
hojostache
In what world is this true? Familia and Reed are better than anyone in WAS’ BP. The guys behind them are very effective role players. Blevins is a very good lefty (though can pitch to both L/R bats), and the guys left fighting for the last few spots all have shown they can pitch in tight spots. Gsellman/Lugo did it as starters, so stepping in to pitch an inning with 2-3 effective pitches will most likely make them more than serviceable 7th inning guys.
If most sports writers are saying WAS needs BP help….I’d take that as a sign that they need help. Signing Blanton was the best non-trade move to make, but I personally think they will look very thin if ANY of those arms goes down for an extended period of time…which happens in baseball.
coachbrad
I was hoping the dodgers would resign him. I can see the question marks teams might have had though; low babip, more hard contact, fewer pop ups, more fly balls.
He was nails all season for the Dodgers and took us far as he could. Best of luck to him.
SupremeZeus
Could be nice value if he still has enough left in that old arm for a full season + playoffs. Late in the season he was gassed, his slider was flat, lots of hard contact and he got beat when games were in the balance in counts where hitters knew what was coming (slider). I wouldn’t trust him in high leverage situation in the playoffs (certainly not the last 3/4 outs).
start_wearing_purple
I didn’t watch him last season, but I believe in numbers having meaning. According to his splits, Blanton clearly declined over the season, but he also pitched more innings than any non-starter for the Dodgers. Add to that 47 of his 80 innings came on 1 day of rest or less.
I’d say he was being misused. If the Nats can stretch him out more, make sure he doesn’t pitch consecutive days as often, I think he could be a good arm for the Nats late in the season.
norcalblue
Yup, I think your point is spot on. The Dodgers had a very good pen last year–primarily because of Kenley, Joe and Dayton. Unfortunately, the inability of the LAD starters to eat innings throughout the year really tasked the bullpen. Despite the depth of starters and in the pen (Dodger pen threw far more innings than any other pen in the playoffs), these guys were gassed by October. Only Kenley was fresh or just strong enough to step up his game in October. The rest were all running on fumes.
norcalblue
I guess I might quibble with the term “misused”. Doc did what he had to do and, despite the amazing depth, the pitching staff was just spent by October. As a Dodger fan, I thought we were competitive with the Cubs; but, in the end, Cubs were the deeper and stronger team in October and they deserved to be in the WS.
BlueSkyLA
Yeah, misused is not the right word. Not only did the starting rotation demand massive use of the bullpen, Roberts was saddled with ineffective relievers (Hatcher, in particular) who should never have been on the roster, let alone, in the setup role. Blanton was signed to be the long man. He was only moved into the setup role when nobody else worked out. Roberts worked with what he was given.
gamemusic3 2
That is not completely true. Roberts did use Blanton unnecessarily in low leverage situations.
DannyQ3913
Love Heavy B!
hyraxwithaflamethrower
Is it me or does nearly every contract the Nationals offer contain deferred money? I wonder how much they’re putting off for the future.
National Anthem
Does this really need to be spelled out again? Simplifying the situation: the Orioles hold the Nationals” broadcast rights. The Nationals are fighting that in court. Oriole owner Angelos owes the Nationals money. The incurred debt plus (hopefully) a more favorable TV contract will be used to pay the deferred payments. Long term, there’s no issue.
bearsfan49055
The Nats need to trade for Robertson.
Francisco
Nats are the king of deferred salaries.
pullhitter445
Blanton is garbage. He handed the Cubs a playoff game.
Sid Bream
Go back and have a look at what the catcher called on 2 strikes on Addison Russell. It was exactly the same pitch as strike 2, and Russell was sitting on it and said thanks for coming. Are you going to blame Blanton for throwing the pitch that the catcher called? He did hang it, but the call was a bad call. I blame the catcher for calling a dumb pitch.