With their payroll flexibility increasing, their farm system among the majors’ elite and their attendance down, the Yankees could be in position to make major splashes, observes FOX Sports’ Ken Rosenthal. Even if New York signs closer Aroldis Chapman and designated hitter/outfielder Carlos Beltran, which it’s interested in doing, general manager Brian Cashman might not stop there. Picking up another reliever to team with Chapman and Dellin Betances would become possible, writes Rosenthal, who adds that the Yankees could also improve their pitching by using their prospect pool to acquire a top-tier starter via trade. The Yankees do have Tyler Clippard on hand as an accomplished option capable of setting up Betances and Chapman, though, and Rosenthal concedes that the Bombers could decide this offseason is too early to surrender a haul for a starter.
More from Rosenthal:
- The Cubs have done background work on Kenley Jansen, arguably the top free agent closer, but it doesn’t appear they’re seriously pursuing him, major league sources told Rosenthal. The World Series champions don’t want to overspend on a closer because it could preclude them from making a big signing in the near future (Japanese superstar Shohei Otani, for instance), notes Rosenthal. That would seemingly rule out the Cubs re-signing Chapman, who joins Jansen as one of the two best relievers available. MLBTR projects record contracts for both Jansen and Chapman, and Cubs general manager Jed Hoyer has already indicated that the team isn’t necessarily looking to splurge on a reliever.
- The Rays are primed to base their 2017 approach on which starting pitcher they trade, writes Rosenthal. If the Rays deal right-hander Alex Cobb or southpaw Drew Smyly, both of whom have two or fewer years of team control remaining, they’re likely to make an attempt at competing next season. On the other hand, shipping righties Chris Archer (five years of team control) or Jake Odorizzi (three) out would signal a rebuild. Even if Tampa Bay chooses the latter route, it’s still unlikely to move third baseman Evan Longoria, the longtime face of the franchise. Longoria has demonstrated remarkable durability since 2013, missing just six games, and has Rays officials convinced he could be part of winning Tampa Bay teams down the line. The 31-year-old is controllable through the 2023 season.
- The Padres are high on first baseman Wil Myers and won’t trade him unless they’re “blown away” by an offer, sources informed Rosenthal. San Diego and Myers are in the early stages of long-term extension talks, so the plan is to retain the soon-to-be 26-year-old for the long haul. Myers, a 2016 All-Star who slashed .259/.336/.461 with 28 home runs and 28 steals in 676 plate appearances, is set to make his first of as many as three arbitration trips.
- The Cardinals have floated right-hander Michael Wacha’s name in trade talks, according to Rosenthal, who’s skeptical that the club would receive much in return for the 25-year-old because of his injury issues. Wacha threw 181 1/3 innings in 2015, but he missed significant time each of the two seasons in between because of shoulder troubles. He was terrific from 2013-15, recording a 3.21 ERA, 7.95 K/9, 2.8 BB/9 in 353 frames, though he posted a bloated ERA (5.09) in 138 innings this past season. While Wacha’s strikeout and walk rates of 7.43 and 2.93 per nine were close to previous norms (he also registered a career-high ground-ball rate of 46.6 percent), it’s possible the Cardinals will move him to the bullpen next season in his first of three arb-eligible campaigns.
- The Rangers had interest in right-hander Edinson Volquez before reaching an agreement Friday with fellow righty Andrew Cashner, per Rosenthal. Volquez began his career with the Rangers, who signed him as an international free agent in 2001, and went to Cincinnati in 2007 in the trade that brought outfielder and eventual five-time All-Star/2010 American League MVP Josh Hamilton to Texas.
cardfan2011
Interesting idea to trade Wacha, cuz he is the odd man out of the rotation
RedFeather
Garcia is.. lets be honest here.
cards667
Wacha and Garcia are odd men out.
Martinez, Wainwright, Reyes, Leake, Lynn. Wacha doesn’t have much success in the pen, but is intriguing. If there is an injury he could step in too, Rosenthal is stretching out as a starter too.
JT19
Don’t really watch the Cards so just wondering, do you know why Wacha struggles in the pen? And health permitting, is he just better as a starter as opposed to coming out of the pen? Because even though it would make some sense for the Cards to try to trade one of the two for help/depth elsewhere, if Wacha can figure out a role in the bullpen, I could also see the Cards utilizing one of Garcia/Wacha as an extra starter/long reliever and the other as a long reliever/”fireman” role that Andrew Miller filled during the postseason.
STLCards33
I don’t think the cardinals want both Wacha and Garcia pitching out of the bullpen when the season starts. One of them will get traded
billydaking
When he first came up to the majors, Wacha didn’t struggle as a reliever–he performed as a shutdown guy. Wacha’s issues since then have been his injuries and maintaining his mechanics. He pretty fell apart toward the end of last season as a starter, and the bullpen may be the place to reset him as well as where he could be most effective at this point in his career.
EndinStealth
No its Wacha.
cardfan2011
Yes Garcia is as well…like Cards667 said, the rotation is Martinez, Reyes, Lynn, Wainwright and Leake
ncv
No, it’s Wacha. Garcia is LH and none of the other 6 are, so
Between Wacha and GarcĂa, the latter has some advantage.
davidcoonce74
Teams need more than 5 starters though.
STLCards33
They’re stretching out rosenthal to be a potential starter
billydaking
It’s not between Wacha and Garcia. It’s neither Wacha or Garcia. Both are on the outs in the rotation,
And Rosenthal is being stretched out to be the kind of multi-inning fireman that Miller is. He’s never started in the majors, and the last time he started any professional game was 2012.
Outlaws12
Rosenthal has always wanted to be a starter and with him having shoulder issues last year and his control issues a mid innings long Nan serves two purposes. He can build innings for a starting bid next season and build confidence and increase value. I hope he does well and becomes an Andrew Miller type. If he can control his fastball he is very difficult to hit.
Outlaws12
Mid innings “long man*
Damn fat fingers on my iPhone
Logjammer D"Baggagecling
If the cubs want to repeat they need a closer. I don’t see how signing Chapman or Jansen would not allow them to sign shohei otani
ilikebaseball 2
Why bring Chapman back, while in the end we won! Heck ya! So the deal was well worth it, but in the process its pretty clear Chapman doesn’t really fit into Maddon’s style. Chapman just wants to take the ball in the 9th with a chance for a save, and his body language on the mound made that more than clear any time Maddon brought him out with runners on in the 7th and 8th. Jensen only throws the cutter so if its not working not much you can do. I’d rather find a closer who’s got a second option if I’m paying the big money.
mike127
If Rondon and/or Strop were 100% Chapman never would have pitched more than a four out save in the playoffs. That bullpen was set up like KC’s of the past couple seasons before the injuries to Rondon and Strop. Chapman DID take the ball and did pitch 5, 6, 7 out saves in the playoffs. That is the nature of playoff baseball, NOT Maddon’s style. I am pretty sure that the Cubs, nor baseball, had ANY seven or eight out saves by a CLOSER the entire season (there were probably a handful of three or four inning “saves” by someone that finished a 13-2 ball game). Chapman did exactly as he was asked and sometimes the most critical part of the game happens to be the 7th inning. Because the playoffs are a sprint managers play the scenarios much different than they do in the regular season. I am willing to bet that whoever becomes the Cubs closer next year will NEVER, during the regular season get a six, seven or eight out save.
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
Well they’ll probably have to rework a Rizzo deal at some point. They’ll need SP or two after next year. Hendricks, Bryant, and Russell start arb. Ottani is going to cost 30M. With Boras you’re not getting a team friendly contract for Bryant. They’ll trade for a cost effective high leverage reliever and see if Edwards/Montgomery wins the job. It’s simple they don’t need to pay market price for a closer and they won’t.
amishthunderak
Rework a Rizzo deal?
mike127
They need to “rework” a Rizzo deal after 2019. You don’t have to worry about Boras/Bryant until 2022. Even with about 12 guys hitting arbitration in a few years it’s not going to matter—this organization has everything aligned to when the current TV deals ALL run out at the same time and they launch their own network in 2019. They will certainly be able to support any payroll as this group hits free agency. And, still they have become really, really good due to their depth and there are still some of these guys that won’t become yearly all stars.
Logjammer D"Baggagecling
I can’t see Bryant ever leaving. I could see him dropping boras. Boras made it clear last year he’s gonna do everything he can to get Bryant out of Chicago. If Bryant is smart he fires boras as soon as he can.
davidcoonce74
He would fire the best agent in baseball? Why would that be to his advantage? Truly curious.
bleedcubbieblue
If your an MVP with his impressive resume already why on earth would you need a super agent like Boras? Bryant should be able to fill in his own blank check just off of what he has accomplished so far in his young career.
lyle
Did you not see the A-Rod contracts? That’s why MVP caliber players love Boras. He takes that blank check and turns it into teams emptying the bank for the player.
Jeff Jones
Because he would see that Boras is only looking out for himself. Bryant will soon realize that if continues he will be the next iconic player beloved by the fans joining the likes of Banks, Santo, and Sandberg.
davidcoonce74
Boras is a player agent. I’m genuinely curious about how he is looking out only for himself? If the Cubs want Bryant to be a “career cub” (neither Santo nor Sandberg were that, btw), then they’ll pay for it. No reason for a player to not maximize his value, especially with one of the richest teams in the league. To do that you hire the best.
Jeff Jones
Never said Santo / Sandberg were career Cubs , I know they played for other teams. They have been iconic Cubs because they made the HOF status playing for the Cubs . Players are starting to realize that making the maximum millions of dollars is not as important as winning the WS. Heyward, Lackey Zobrist and Lester all took less for a better shot at a championship.
davidcoonce74
Lackey is in the twilight of his career and Zobrist is also on the wrong side of 30. Heyward took less but also has an opt-out in that contract.
Bryant has no obligation to the Cubs. All they did was draft him. If he wants to maximize his value he will. Hiring Boras implies that he’s interested in making the most he can during his career. And after the way the Cubs manipulated his service time last year I don’t blame him.
One Fan
Boras is looking out for himself as he only wants ever penny he can get so he can recruit other players and he wants that reputation. Thats why. Having a player move teams and change cities and give up the built in good will where the player currently is and is comfortable has proven time and again to be a move the player regrets.
One Fan
Oh boo hoo David cry me a river. They way the manipulated his service time is a collectively bargained for right. Ever team does it and the Cubs did the absolute right thing. If Bryant ultimately leaves it will have zero to do with that but the Cubs doing that will have one extra prime year season before he would leave which could be a championship season and more proof the Cubs played it right.
Spare me the you dont blame him crap. If he wants top dollar as free agent then I can agree with that comment but not if you are saying he is leaving in five years because of the service time. By the way if that were true then let him walk. You think if the Cubs did not do that then he stays and takes less? No sir he would still be gone but be gone a year sooner which could cost a championship season.
davidcoonce74
The player chooses what he wants. Boras is his agent. Plenty of Boras clients stay right where they are. Some of them even take less money to do so.
davidcoonce74
The Cubs manipulated his service time so that they could extract maximum value from Bryant. If Bryant leaves in a few years in free agency it will be so he can extract maximum value from his talent. It’s a two way street.
Jeff Jones
Lackey won 11 games and Zobrist was WS MVP.. Heywards defense helped the Cubs. Boras can almost guarantee a max salary, he cannot guarantee championships.
Outlaws12
Especially since he went out of his way to thank Boras and his agency during his MVP acceptance interview.
Outlaws12
Heyward didn’t take the Cubs offer because of some Cub loyalty for a team he had never played for – he took it because of the opt out clauses only benefit him. He plays poor (which he did his first year) he still gets paid, and if he plays great he can opt out and get more money somewhere so your argument is sorta flawed. Lackey also got more money from Cubs than Cards would offer or other teams and he wanted to play with his buddy Lester.
Anyway – good luck with that Bryant firing Boras thing. Lol
One Fan
Why would they rework the Rizzo deal? Also who cares if Bryant and Russell start going to arbitration which would be after next year by the way. Arbitration will not break the bank and they are not free agents until after 2021 so who cares what Boras may want. None of that should matter on the budget the next few years not to mention the cash they have coming when the new TV deal comes in the next few years as well plus the added dough for hopefully being in playoffs ever season and the Wrigley renovation that will be done in a few years
Mikel Grady
Agreed. Fowler hammel and Edwin jackson money gone. Dodgers nationals Cubs Indians all had lights out closer and last teams standing
RedFeather
Hey baseball.. Michael Wacha is only 24 years old and take a look at his career numbers. This kid had one “down” year but he has proven to be a great pitcher thus far. I know he is somewhat injury prone but if the Cardinals are shopping him and a team could get him at a solid deal why the heck not? He would be a #2 in most rotations and has the ability to become an Ace at some point.
wiggysf
If you subtract the injuries
EndinStealth
Yeah, if you subtract the injuries they don’t trade him.
chesteraarthur
keep thinking that!
gojira15
If you believe in him so much, why not let him be St. Louis’ No. 2 starter? Wacha is coming off a poor season and he seems to be having trouble shouldering a full starter workload. His value is down, as it’s not clear if he can be a starter at all. I think a team like Miami makes sense to gamble here, perhaps in a deal for Hechavarria. Put the shoe on the other foot: Wacha is a lesser Matt Harvey, and how much would you trade to acquire Harvey?
Wacha and Rosenthal took major hits to their value with poor 2016 seasons. Do you think Mozeliak should trade these fading pitchers for something while they still have some value, or do you think he should hang on to these two talented hurlers and count on bounce back seasons?
oldleftylong
Hey baseball,… Justin Verlander is only 34 years old. He had an awesome season and could easily have won the CY award. He would be an ace in almost any rotation. Make Detroit an offer!
66TheNumberOfTheBest
I’d take Wacha in a heartbeat.
The Pirates would gain a few wins just by subtracting all the losses to Wacha.
STLCards33
Injuries have held him back not ability.
chesteraarthur
says 50% of failed pitching prospects
One Fan
Red feather. Take your own advice then. If he is so good keep him!
Outlaws12
Exactly, and Andrew Miller was a failed starter and moved to the bullpen. I’m not saying wacha is a failed starter but moving Wacha and Rosenthal to a mid inning reliever could “catch fire in a bottle” as they say. You know – “they”
connorreed
I’m really curious as to the logic behind this thinking. I’ve seen it so much with Cardinal fans on this site recently.
Wacha doesn’t fit into their rotation, but they think he’s worth the value of a #2 starter.
They need to look for a closer, but Rosenthal should be a top tier trade chip.
They need a new first baseman, but Matt Adams should be able to get a significant package.
Jedd Gyorko and Jhonny Peralta aren’t contender level talent, but they could be used to make St. Louis into a contender.
Nobody is going to value Cardinal players solely on their upside. If that was how baseball worked, Henry Owens, Deven Marrero, and Blake Swihart would be an overpay for Chris Sale.
timyanks
anyone not named martinez or reyes are odd men out
Doc Halladay
Just spitballing here but I keep seeing Cards fans talking about needing a CF. How much interest would they have in Dalton Pompey from the Jays? He doesn’t seem to be in the teams plans which is too bad because he is a talented player with a relatively high ceiling. What more would need to be added to him for the Jays to get Wacha?
I’d love to put Wacha into the rotation and shift Liriano to the bullpen in an Andrew Miller-type multi-inning role.
cards667
I don’t see the Cardinals giving up Wacha for a “prospect”. They want/need a good glove. Grichuk is acceptable in CF, but should be much better in LF. Getting a good glove in CF who can probably hit top of the order is what they are looking for. Blackmon, Eaton, Pollock type. Could be interested in Kiermaier even though he doesn’t fit in the line up as well. Gardner could be a fall back option, if they leave Grichuk in CF. There are many ways to look at it, but I think if they are trading Wacha it would be part of a package to get a more proven player.
Doc Halladay
That makes sense. Pompey fits what you’d be looking for in theory, he just hasn’t proven it in the big leagues yet. Like I said, I was spitballing and thought their might be a fit.
rss7
Chapman, Jansen, and Betances. Do it.
JT19
Unless the Yankees gave one/both of them a complete boatload of money, I don’t see that happening. Both would probably prefer to be paid market rate and be the closer so I doubt Jansen and Chapman sign to the same team knowing only one of them will be the official “closer”.
phils phanatic
as an admitted redbird hater i’d love to see them trade wacha!I think the grounder rate is legit and the cards defense last year was awful.the injuries should drive his price down enough that it’d be a worthwhile gamble
rivera42
I hope Cashman is talking to the Cards about Wacha. If he can be had on the cheap, he could be a steal, provided he can stay healthy.
cj1020
How about Ellsberg and cash for wacha and a prospect
cj1020
Ellsbury. Sorry
cards667
Garcia for Gardner would make more sense for the Cardinals. But I think it would be more plan D. After trying to get Pollock, Eaton, Kiermaier, Blackmon, so on. If they all want to much Gardner could be a fall back.
rivera42
Garcia does not get you Gardner. Especially when you factor in how injury prone Garcia is.
gojira15
Agreed. Garcia plus a choice of bullpen arms like Tuivailala, Maness (sinkerballer could be great for Yankee Stadium), and Rosenthal. Greg Garcia would be a great addition for the Yanks, though I think the Yankees might need to add more on their side to get Garcia.
I don’t see Ellsbury for Wacha as plausible. Sticking with St. Louis, Ellsbury for Leake could work, or a similar contract. I know you didn’t suggest it, just saving my time.
JT19
As much as Wacha has been an injury problem for the Cards, why would they do this? A young, decent starting pitcher for an overpaid outfielder who everyone knows the Yankees are deaperate to get rid of? Assuming the Cards even though Ellsbury could help them, the Yankees would have to eat a large portion of his remaining contract and still probably throw in another valuable piece (along with the Cards throwing in another piece or two, like a lottery ticket minor leaguer).
bsteady powers
How is it OVER SPENDING? When Chapman played a HUGE ROLE IM UOUR FIRST Championship in 108 years. I would sign Jensen. His cutter is devastating. Then you have a whole year of Rondon and Strop and Exwards setting up. Re-sign Wood, and sign Cashner for the pen. And add a quality lefty.
bsteady powers
The Cubs will have plenty of money when their TV deal comes thru in the next few years.
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
Cashier is a ranger as of today.
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
Cashner
JT19
Andrew Cashner? As in the Andrew Cashner who signed with the Rangers?
bsteady powers
Yeah that one. OBVIOUSLY, I wasn’t aware at the time of my post. You people kill me how u get off being a smartelleck
JT19
I mean it’s basically been in the news for at least a day (I believe TradeRumors reported the agreement two days ago) sooo…
baseball0021
Definitely being one here, but I believe you mean smart-aleck and not smartelleck
ChiSoxCity
What Cubs fans don’t seem to acknowledge is their bullpen was awful last year. They don’t even make the NLCS without Chapman last year, let alone win a World Series.
Cubs fans are typically overly optimistic about their roster. They could sign some scrub from Double-A to close–Cubs fans won’t care.
bleedcubbieblue
Chapman was a great addition to the pin and a BIG reason why the Cubs won it all. But 20 mil per for a closer to sit half the games in a season is crazy. If I’m getting two solid innings every appearance I would buy it.
theo2016
lol they had a great bullpen, cahill wasn’t even on the playoff roster. rondon was lights out pre injury. strop, edwards, montgomery were terrific. all the bullpen numbers were inflated by Clayton Richard and Spencer patton
bsteady powers
Still upset? Sowwy your team has talent and sucks bad
chesteraarthur
Cuz Chapman didn’t play a HUGE role? Their locked up core + veterans did. Unless you expect strop and rondon to be hurt next year too
That said, the cubs are gonna be printing money, so sign chapman or melancon
Philliesfan4life
the cubs are better off going after Melancon or sombody like Feliz or Papelbon.
ASapsFables
Shohei Otani. Japan’s version of Babe Ruth, from his days in Boston when he pitched and played in the field.
davidcoonce74
Otani won’t play the field at all in MLB. Maybe occasionally he’d DH. But that arm is way too valuable.
ASapsFables
Yeah, they said the same thing about the Bambino back then also. He was a premium starting pitcher but his bat became too valuable. Just check the improvement in Otani’s slash line in 2016 from previous seasons. The same thing could happen with him.
chesteraarthur
yes, because baseball is the same then as it was back then. Not a multi=billion dollar business, or anything.
davidcoonce74
You should also note that Babe Ruth immediately quit pitching as soon as the dead-ball era ended (1920). He wouldn’t have been remotely good as a pitcher once the lively ball was introduced, and his value as a hitter was much higher, obviously.
Ruth’s numbers as a pitcher, for the era in which he pitched (the dead ball era) were good, but he was also a guy who walked as many batters as he struck out, basically. That wasn’t going to fly after 1920. His final season on the mound he walked 58 batters and struck out 30.
Just to give an idea of what the dead-ball era was like, in 1917 Ruth had an ERA of 2.01. That was 7th in the league.
stormie
His bat looks like it is becoming too valuable to waste too though. Unless every single MLB team would be unwilling to use him in both roles, then the highest bidder will likely be a team who will, because they’ll be bidding for a potential 8 WAR player, while the other teams will just be bidding for a 5 WAR pitcher.
davidcoonce74
If he insists on being a two-way player that limits him to the AL only because no team in its right mind would let him play the field. I doubt DHing twice a week, no matter how well he hits, adds 3 wins to his value. And he can’t DH on the days he pitches, obviously.
Priggs89
1) Why would he only be DH’ing twice a week if he pitches once every 5 games? If his bat is legit, he’d be DH’ing basically every game between starts.
2) AL teams don’t NEED to use the DH… If they feel his bat is THAT good, they could manage his starts like a NL game and let him hit. It wouldn’t be ideal once he’s out of the game, but it wouldn’t be any different than managing an inter-league game… Not the worst option assuming his bat is legit.
davidcoonce74
They would not DH him on his throw day, for sure. And arm fatigue after his starts would keep him out of the next game or two also. Hitting requires arm strength too.
And in any game Otani got knocked out early the team would obliterate its bench since most AL teams only carry four bench players.
bigkempin
I don’t see why Rosenthal feels that Jansen could potentially affect the Cubs going after Otani. Otani doesn’t even have to be posted until after the NPB’s 2021 season. By then Jansen would most likely be gone. The Ham fighters have no reason to post him until then. NPB teams no longer have the incentive to post players early.
ChiSoxCity
The Cubs’ bullpen will be garbage without a decent closer. They’ll have to go out and trade for one mid-season again. I don’t understand why clubs do this after they win a championship. The Cubs can afford an elite closer, but they’re more concerned about free agency next season. How about focusing on winning a championship.
bsteady powers
Ok I agree with that
ASapsFables
The Cubs bullpen is stronger now than it was at this time last offseason. Hector Rondon is still on board and would re-assume the closer role that he didn’t lose due to any fault of his own. Pedro Strop also returns while Carl Edwards Jr. provides yet a third right-handed power arm for the late innings. Those three make a pretty impressive trio for the back of the bullpen which should also have Mike Montgomery as the late inning lefty replacing Travis Wood.
The Cubs priority this offseason should be to try and acquire an impacting, controllable arm for the starting rotation. Reports suggest many high quality/ace level SP’s might available in trade, including Chris Sale, Jose Quintana, Chris Archer and Sonny Gray. Landing one of those should be their primary objective. If the Cubs succeed but need to include one of those premium young BP arms in any deal, they could then pursue one of the high level FA closers as a replacement. All the SP’s mentioned are under team friendly contracts or pre-arbitration eligible (Gray) so acquiring one of their salaries might not dissuade the Cubs from spending .on an impact closer in the aftermath.
Philliesfan4life
the cubs shouldn’t make a trade for a starter until they know what they are going to do with jake arrieta.
tim815
They’ve decided that. They aren’t giving him a player-friendly extension.
They’ll use a 6-Man rotation as soon as the 26 Man roster is a reality. If they want to use Montgomery as a skeleton key guy, they will want another SP before camp opens. It an unstated priority to add a SP.
chesteraarthur
Yep, garbage: strop, rondon, edwards, montgomery are all fkin awful, awful relief pitchers. Don’t let facts get in the way of your vendetta though. Just remember 2005~
ChiSoxCity
I watched 98% of the Cubs games last year. The talent on that club hid the weakness of their bullpen. They rarely needed Rodon to close games because they were blowing teams out early in the year. When they did need Rodon midway thru the season, he was terrible. In fact, the only reliable relievers in that bullpen were Strop (before he got hurt), Edwards, Montgomery, and Chapman. Chapman will be gone, Montgomery might br a starter. That leaves Strop and Edwards, who are setup guys. So who closes?
How can you possibly have any confidence in Rodon after the way he pitched, especially during the playoffs? You can’t walk people then throw balls with no movement belt high down the middle of the plate, especially when closing out games. The Cubs have a great team, but there’s a reason why they traded for Chapman. You must have a reliable closer to win a best of 5 or 7 game series.
Philliesfan4life
I think they should go after Melancon or other guys like Feliz , Koji and Romo
ChiSoxCity
I don’t understand why the Cubs won’t spend the money on an elite closer. They have the rare opportunity to win multiple championships, possibly back-to-back. Why not lockdown a Jensen, Chapman or Melancon on a 4-year deal? The Jason Heyward defied logic, since he never put up big offensive numbers. Now it’s impacting their ability to spend on pitching. They’re a much better team with Bryant as the everyday RF, and Zobrist or Baez at 3rd anyway. Essentially, the Cubs gave $184MM to a bench player.
chesteraarthur
because he was good for everything but the playoffs, in which he was probably hurt.
Mikel Grady
They will. Theo not going to let agents or other gm’s know he is going hot and heavy for one.
ottomatic
Keeping Longoria makes no sense besides selling tickets in the short term. He’s going to be in his mid 30s soon and could easily fall off a cliff performance wise. Then they would get nothing for him. If they don’t deal him this offseason and are out of it again at the deadline they have to trade him. They’re being stubborn
ducksnort69
Longoria is likely staying for good or at least the next 2 years. There are plenty of other teams doing the same thing. Goldie in AZ and Freeman in Atlanta to name 2. They are not going to do what the Cubs and Astros did by tanking.
cxcx
Arizona signed a $200m pitcher last offseason and traded their best prospect for another good pitcher. Nothing like the Rays.
Philliesfan4life
dbacks trading kings ransom for miller will come back to bite them. they can bounce back if greinke + miller + corbin have bounce back years and pollock stays healthy.
Bald Vinny
Maybe MLB should give Wacha to the Astros……
SixFlagsMagicPadres
What kind of contract would Myers be looking at from the Padres? Maybe 4 or 5 years for around 80 million?
Philliesfan4life
Trade Scenarios for Chris Sale
Pirates: Cutch + Glasnow + Khul + Kingham
Dodgers: Urias + De Leon + plus others
Braves: Jenkins + Newcomb and others
I’m not a gm but thinking like one
davidcoonce74
No reason for the rebuilding WS to deal for McCutchen, and Glasnow has some red flags. The other two guys are wild-cards.
The Dodgers aren’t dealing Urias, period. Unless it was for Mike Trout straight up or something.. Urias may be the most valuable young pitcher in the game.
Braves – just not enough talent heading over. Inciarte or Swanson would have to start that conversation, and the Braves aren’t dealing either of those guys.
connorreed
Agreed with davidcoonce74.
I don’t think any of these are good offers.
Pirates package makes no sense for the White Sox, and there’s not enough talent.
Dodgers aren’t trading Urias.
And potential Sale headliners are along the lines of JBJ/Moncada, Gallo/Profar, Giolito/Robles, etc. A package headlined by Jenkins/Newcomb wouldn’t be enough for any of the top trade targets (Gray, Teheran, Quintana, Archer), let alone Sale.
Priggs89
God I hope the White Sox aren’t dumb enough to trade Sale for a package headlined by Gallo/Profar. That being said, it wouldn’t surprise me.
cxcx
“Wacha threw 181 1/3 innings in 2015, but he missed significant time each of the two seasons in between because of shoulder troubles.”
Which two seasons were in between 2015?