Injured Cubs slugger Kyle Schwarber probably isn’t going anywhere this summer, as Gordon Wittenmyer of the Chicago Sun-Times reports. President of baseball operations Theo Epstein gave strong signals that he’s got little interest in seeing Schwarber return from his knee injury in another uniform. While there’s always plenty of posturing this time of year, Epstein certainly made clear that there’s a higher-than-usual barrier to a trade involving the catcher/outfielder.
Here’s more from the NL Central:
- The Brewers are winding up for what looks to be an important trade deadline, as MLB.com’s Adam McCalvy reports. Milwaukee has several notable names that rate amongst the top twenty trade candidates this summer, but few represent straightforward decisions. GM David Stearns says that “the calls have picked up over the last week to ten days,” though it’s “still largely informational.” Right now, the club is getting a feel for the teams it is looking to target in reaching agreements over the coming month. “You try to get a sense of what other clubs are doing, where you might have fits, so you can begin to do additional target work on certain target organizations,” says Stearns. “At this point, we feel well-prepared in terms of organizations we’re likely to have serious discussions with.”
- Selling was never in the plans for the Pirates, but the club increasingly looks to be in a tough spot — in no small part due to the struggles of lefty Francisco Liriano, who owns a 5.33 ERA with 9.0 K/9 and 5.9 BB/9 on the year. Manager Clint Hurdle tells John Perrotto of the Beaver County Times that Liriano is still failing to command the ball with consistency. “Sometimes, it’s hard to pitch when you aren’t feeling the way you’ve felt when you’ve had success,” Hurdle said. “We’re going to continue to peel back the layers and try to push through this. We’ll continue to look at video. We’ll see if we can find some answers.” We have heard at least some suggestion that there’d be interest around the league in the talented lefty, who had turned in three-straight stellar campaigns heading into 2016. But he’s owed $13MM both this year and next, and surely any acquiring team would be looking for a buy-low opportunity.
TheCanoShow
Cubs won’t make the same mistake the Red Sox made with trading Babe Ruth.
Patick L
Oh please
Bobby Sweet
Did you seriously just compare Kyle Schwarber to Babe Ruth?
TheCanoShow
I do not think he is the next Babe Ruth, but Cubs fans have told me that he is the next Babe Ruth.
thebare
Klye is baby Ruth bet on it
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
Haha how? Ruth was traded to fund an owners wife. Not to win. Not only that Ruth had a position that wasn’t block. On that note the Cubs are intelligent. They understand how important offense is. I’m a Dodgers fan and I even think what they have in young offense in just (Rizzo, Bryant, Shwarber, and Baez) is extremely impressive. Schwarber’s growth in the OF was tremendous. They can mix and match. There’s no question in my mind that Bryant can handle RF and Schwaber can handle LF with Baez at 3rd. But a comparison to Ruth is ridiculous if they were to trade him. Obviously he may fit best in the AL but come on……
brewcat
I suspect the original comment was facetious, but Ruth was sold by the Red Sox, not traded, was not a rookie, and was still transitioning from pitching. Otherwise it was an apt comparison.
Lance
Ruth was sent to NYC for cash because Sox owner Harry Frazee was a Broadway Show producer who needed cash to fund new projects. Part of that money Frazee got was to fund “No No Nanette” which was a huge success. From a baseball standpoint, that sale was terrible. From a business standpoint, the deal was a success for Frazee individually.
bsteady powers
Very nice
darenh
Cubs fans are shockingly smug given the 109 years of irrelevance.
Cd360
It’s all been building up. If you lose Jenga 100 times in a row and then finally win, you’ll overreact becuase you don’t realize how insignificant the victory really was.
jd396
Yeah, if you’re 6
cubsfan24
Cub fans aren’t smug. Cub fans are just excited about having some nice pieces and finally having a team on the field that gives them a chance to win. Even though they haven’t accomplished anything yet, it’s good to see them wanting to actually go for it. I’ve loved this team since I was a kid and despite all the losing and heartbreak I’ve always stuck by them. There’s nothing wrong with having pride in your team, if you don’t have that then you’re not a true fan
themed
Only time in history I’ve ever recalled an organization finished last for years just to get high draft picks. Sorry no respect for the cubs here at all. Hope they fall on there face as always. Great tradition they have there. LOSING
Ry.the.Stunner
Then your memory of history is about 1 year long.
cubsfan24
What about the Astros getting the top overall pick in 2-3 straight drafts?? What do you call that?? What about the Royals up until the last couple years?? Or SD, Minn, or any other perennial loser. Teams don’t just lose to lose. The Cubs entire system was gutted and rebuilt. You don’t rebuild a system by buying expensive free agents, ask the Yanks
cubsfan24
And if their tradition is losing, as you put, then how are they the 1st team in history to lose to try and gain draft picks. Your whole theory just collapsed on itself. According to you it’s their tradition to lose
themed
They lost a year ago also.
themed
They lost a year ago just like every season for the last 116 years!
cubsfan24
So then according to your theory they’ve been losing for 116 years to acquire draft picks, right??
Nola Di Bari 67
They wanted to actually go for it in 1984, 1989, 2003, 2004, 2007,2008 to no avail.
metseventually 2
I really don’t understand why they won’t move him…he has no place on the field except for 1B or DH…
tryptamine
Just because people like you keep saying it doesn’t make it true. You watched him in one series all year in which he struggled so now you’ve decided he’s not capable of playing LF. His UZR/150 is only -2 which puts him just below average, hardly a butcher or completely unable to play the OF.
cubsfan24
I think they will move him for a top half of the rotation, young, controllable starter eventually. The kid is 23, hasn’t even begun to tap into his potential. There is no hurry. Yes they need pitching now but I think they have other pieces that can be used to get it this year
bsteady powers
I believe this comparison is quite simple. A stocky lefty with tremendous pop. That’s it. Nice and simple folks
MikePLV10
He would be a great replacement for Ortiz in Boston.. Though they, I believe, plan to use Hanley there next year.
Lance
if the Cubs think they have the second coming of Ruth, then fine, don’t trade him. There’s no reason to think he’ll be a great defensive outfielder but if he’s willing to work hard, he can become decent.
Mikel Grady
This is what makes baseball fun, Schwarber is coveted by Cubs brass as well as most cub fans. I enjoyed watching his moon shot into river and Pittsburgh for wild card win as well as putting one on top of scoreboard at wrigley vs cards to go to nlcs. He isn’t a drunk and womanizer who hit off farmers and factory workers so he is nothing like Babe Ruth.
xxbooradley
The bottom line (as stated that Schwarber can replace future HOF David Ortiz) is that a LH power bat is extremely rare and therefore valuable. The Cubs/Cubs fans don’t over value Schwarber. The fact that teams covet him enough to trade high end “win now” pieces show his value. Seeing as the Cubs front office wouldn’t even part with Baez and/or Soler this off season sets the precedent that they’re only willing to deal from their minor league system. 2016 was supposed to be year one of a 4-6 year period to make the playoffs and hope to win. Trading from your cost controlled MLB roster to get rental pieces makes no sense when looking at their success plan.