Here are MLBTR, we routinely toss around dollar figures in the tens or hundreds of millions in reference to players’ salaries. It’s rare, though, that we get as clear a glimpse into what those tens or hundreds of millions can actually buy as we do in this look at MLB players’ cars, courtesy of Tim Rohan of the New York Times. Specifically, Rohan profiles Alex Vega, who owns a custom car shop in the Miami area. Vega frequently works with baseball players during the offseason, because, he says, “Spring training is when business gets the craziest because everybody wants to show up with something new. I’m already getting calls. I’m already preparing cars.” For example, Rohan notes that Pablo Sandoval recently entered the shop hoping to buy a 2016 Rolls Royce Ghost; he left behind a customized Porsche that he had bought just two years before, only driving it for just over 15,000 miles. The quiz accompanying the article — in which the reader is asked to match the car to the star who bought it — is amusing. Here’s more from around the league.
- This offseason has seen the proliferation of opt-out clauses in long-term contracts, Tim Britton of the Providence Journal writes. Opt-out clauses were so rare in the past that the industry doesn’t have much concrete experience with what their results will be (although, I’ll note, it would be easy to study how opt-outs might have worked in past contracts by imagining what players might have done had they had opt-outs after, say, a year, or two years). The obvious conclusion is that opt-outs are a lose-lose for teams, who should theoretically lose productive players as they opt out while being stuck with the ones who don’t produce. But it might not be so simple, as Red Sox president of baseball operations Dave Dombrowski points out. “There may be other cases where somebody opts out and after a year — I’m not going to say this is going to happen but I’ll use it as an example — after a year something happens to him and he’s not pitching as well, and [a team says], ’See? That was a benefit to us,'” he says. “So we really haven’t reached that second step yet.”
- It’s looking more and more likely that the designated hitter will be implemented in the NL as well as in the AL, Jared Diamond of the Wall Street Journal writes. The players’ association has long supported the change, and taking bats out of pitchers’ hands will help create more runs in an increasingly offense-starved playing environment. Also, Diamond points out that pitchers are hitting even worse than they used to, posting four of their five lowest season OPS marks since 1974 in the last four years.
The Oregonian
Of course Sandoval, the laziest player in baseball, would be mentioned in that article.
yankees500
I was about to write something rude about him too, but you covered it for me!
gomerhodge71
Probably has a chauffeur so he can nap on the long drives.
gmenfan
Seems like the kind of dude that will be destitute in 15 years.
Twinsfan79
No NL DH.
lemieuxkarl66
Agree.
Hate the idea.
free2131
You’re a Twins fan. Why would you care? But you are right. We can’t afford to lose our sac bunts, double switches, and taking out a dominate pitcher so we can pinch hit in the 6th or 7th…. 😉
jb226
I think opt-outs for a team could be a good thing to ameliorate the increasing length of contracts. There’s a common wisdom now that when you sign a big-name free agent, you just hope to get enough value at the front-end of the deal to make it palatable to swallow the contract in the latter years. Well, what if you could practically beg the player to leave after those valuable years by including an opt-out and maybe even front-loading some of the money?
As a Cubs fan, for example, I am happy to have Jason Heyward on my team. However I will be much, much happier if he opts out after two or three years than if he stays for all eight. Naturally, there is a chance he does horribly in the first 2-3 years and thus we’re “stuck” with the remaining five, but that’s how long-term deals work even without the opt-out. Unless players are getting longer deals with opt-outs than they would without, I don’t see much difference there. It also potentially gets you a draft pick if you drop a qualifying offer on him, which you probably should if he was good enough in those early years to opt out at all.
Accordingly, I think the value of the opt-out to the team is proportional to the risk of the contract. For example, I already said I like Heywards’ opt-outs from the teams perspective. I also like it for Johnny Cueto. I don’t like it nearly as much for Justin Upton, because I think the contact value and length, given his age, are actually pretty good. Cespedes, well, I don’t like it in a three-year deal but I assume he would never have signed one without that first-year opt-out, so it’s hard to evaluate.
That’s not to say there are no downsides, such as having to replace those players who opt out later, but I think viewing any inclusion of an opt-out as inherently “lose-lose” is short-sighted.
go_jays_go
“There may be other cases where somebody opts out and after a year — I’m not going to say this is going to happen but I’ll use it as an example — after a year something happens to him and he’s not pitching as well, and [a team says], ’See? That was a benefit to us’
This one happened 3yrs into a 5yr deal, but A.J Burnett’s opt-out with the Blue Jays was absolutely perfect. It was just in time for him to stink it up with the Yankees.
costergaard2
AJ had his ups and downs with the Yankees, but the Yankees would not have won the 2009 World Series without him. In fact, the last game AJ ever pitched for the Yankees was a win in the ALDS that the Yankees lost 3 games to 1. The AJ years were good years in New York and I was happy to see AJ pitch well in PIT and help that franchise contend again…
Redsoxfan10
Colorado Rockies would greatly benefit from the adding the DH to the NL. Would actually turn into contenders
afenton530
How so? The still would have awful pitching..
Stuart Brown
For one they would actually have a place to put their productive but no-position players like WIlin Rosario, whom they released this offseason. As well, they would be able to do a rotating outfield of Parra, Gonzalez, Dickerson, Blackmon, and Barnes on any given day, while keeping an additional one of those bats in the lineup at DH.
Hoosier Hysteria
Bring on the DH! If you had to watch an anemic team like the Padres, it would be a no-brainer.
Benjamin 2
Heyward cannot opt out after two years. He has two opt outs after years 3 or 4. Why would you want him to opt out after 3 years at age 29? I would love to get “stuck” with his age 30-31-32-33-34 years
Lance
the opt out clause gives incentive to the player to bust his rear with the hope of a new/better contract. what is the incentive for Pablo Sandoval to get in shape and work hard? He’s owed another $72 million
MB923
DH helps the Cubs with Schwarber who is a terrible fielder
neoncactus
Exactly. The DH rewards players who can hit, but can’t play the game of baseball. I hope the NL doesn’t adopt it, but there seems to be a big push that way.
Stuart Brown
I’m sure the Cardinals would love to have Piscotty, Holliday, Grichuk, Moss, and Adams in the lineup everyday if they could. Right now they have four positions for those five players. The Phillies would be able to make Ryan Howard the worst DH ever, but at least he wouldn’t be the worst defensive first baseman in the majors anymore. The Nationals would be able to keep their older players more ‘fresh’, by rotating the DH between guys like ZImmerman and Werth as necessary. The Giants would be able to give Posey a ‘rest day’ without having to move Belt to the outfield or benching him. The Dodgers, especially on days facing RHP, would alleviate their outfield logjam by putting one of Ethier, Puig, Crawford, or Pederson at DH. When facing LHP, you replace Ethier or Pederson with Van Slyke/Guerrero/Hernandez.
I think almost all NL teams could have justifiable reasons for adding the DH. Whether they actually want it or whether fans actually want it is another story.
hojostache
The Mets are one of the few teams that would suffer w the DH. They have some of the better hitting pitchers in the league…AND Bartolo Colon, who has improved at the plate while still being great to watch. I guess the Mets could move Duda to DH (assuming they can extend him at a fair rate) and the slot Dominic Smith in at 1B, but that requires resigning Duda AND Smith continue yes to develop and find some power.
East Coast Bias
Cespedes drives the bat mobile.
John Franken
I don’t know why this is considered a new thing: as has been said many times, it’s a short contract with a long player option. Cespedes has a one year contract with an additional two year player option he can exercise. What’s new about that?
Gary333
Did Pablo not fit the Porsche? Is that why it had such low mileage? Lol!
MB923
An article just came out with Manfred saying the NL is Not getting the DH anytime soon.
hojostache
I’ve been in a couple of Vega’s customized rides and they are legit. The sound systems were awesome and nice personalized touches (e.g. Initials in the leather seats) that weren’t gaudy. I’m more of a performance > aesthetic guy, but I totally get why guys go to him.