2:33pm: ESPN’s Jayson Stark tweets that the Reds are now telling other clubs no trade for Chapman has been agreed upon. Stark certainly implies that the Dodgers believed a trade to be done, adding: “I don’t think [the] Dodgers agree.”
2:13pm: The trade is not yet finished, according to MLB.com’s Mark Sheldon (links to Twitter). Not only that, but Sheldon hears that there are other clubs involved who could swoop in and acquire Chapman at the last minute.
11:11am: Peraza’s name did indeed come up in talks between the Dodgers and Reds, tweets Heyman, although he’s yet to confirm if Peraza is indeed heading to Cincinnati in the deal. If that’s the case, he notes, the club could escalate its efforts to deal Brandon Phillips.
9:33am: Jon Heyman of CBS Sports tweets that none of Julio Urias, Corey Seager or Jose De Leon are headed to the Reds in the trade. The Dodgers, though, have plenty of other enticing prospects in their ranks, notably including right-hander Grant Holmes and infielder Jose Peraza as fellow top 100 types (though those names are my own speculation).
9:27am: The Dodgers have struck a deal to acquire one of the game’s most elite bullpen arms, Aroldis Chapman, from the Reds in exchange for a pair of prospects, reports Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports (via Twitter). Rosenthal adds that the Dodgers’ plan is to keep both Chapman and Kenley Jansen, who instantly team to become one of the game’s most dominant late-inning duos (if not the most dominant late-inning duo). The trade is pending medical reviews.
Chapman, 27, enjoyed yet another incredible season in 2015, working to a 1.63 ERA with 15.7 K/9, 4.5 BB/9 and a 37.1 percent ground-ball rate. Over the past four seasons in Cincinnati, the Cuban-born phenom has delivered an astounding 1.90 ERA while averaging 16.1 strikeouts and 3.8 walks per nine innings to go along with an average of 36 saves per season. Chapman, of course, is known for his blistering fastball; the left-hander averaged 100.3 mph on his heater in 2014 and followed that up with a similarly incredulous 99.5 mph average this past season.
The Dodgers recently lost on on retaining Zack Greinke, when the division-rival Diamondbacks made an absolutely stunning push at the eleventh hour and signed him for an unprecedented six-year, $206.5MM sum. The following day, one of L.A.’s fallback plans, Jeff Samardzija, landed a five-year, $90MM contract with yet another division rival, the Giants. Some, then, may consider this move to be somewhat reactionary in nature, though the Dodgers’ interest in Chapman predates both of their division rivals’ acquisitions. Los Angeles, too, has since added to its rotation, bringing in Hisashi Iwakuma on a reported three-year, $45MM contract.
While the sting of losing Greinke is notable, adding Chapman to pair with Jansen will significantly shorten the necessary workload for most of the Dodgers’ rotation, as the team now boasts a pair of arms — one left-handed and one right-handed — that routinely average more than 13 strikeouts per nine innings.
Chapman, like Jansen, is a free agent following the 2016 season, making him a one-year rental, at least for the time being. While both relievers are one characteristically strong season away from a strong case to break Jonathan Papelbon’s record four-year, $50MM contract for a reliever, if there’s any club that has the financial firepower to persuade one of those arms to forego free agency in lieu of an early contract extension, it’s the Dodgers. Should both pitchers reach the open market next winter, I’d wager that both will be easy calls to receive and reject the qualifying offer in search of that record-setting deal. That scenario would set the Dodgers up to acquire a pair of compensatory picks at the end of the first round in the 2017 draft.
Even with Chapman on board, one would imagine that the highly active Dodgers will still be open to adding further relief help. And, of course, more rotation stability will still be an area of focus for president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman and the rest of the team’s front office. Behind Clayton Kershaw and the recently added Iwakuma (assuming his deal is finalized), the Dodgers currently figure to deploy Brett Anderson, Alex Wood and Mike Bolsinger. Hyun-ji Ryu’s arm is a question mark after missing 2015 due to shoulder injuries, and it’s not clear when, exactly Brandon McCarthy will be ready to return from Tommy John surgery.
Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.
Gardner_012
Ughhhhhh no why why why
Joe McMahon
Barnes and Bellinger might be involved. MAYBE Holmes. I would be surprised if Seager, Urias, De Leon, Pederson or Peraza were involved.
Joe McMahon
Opps, that wasn’t supposed to be in response to your thing.
John Murray
The way the Reds have been talking, I can’t imagine the Dodgers can get Chapman without giving up at LEAST one of them….maybe two, if one’s not Seager or Urias.
vailb
For a one-year rental? Not going to happen.
williamg
Why not
onlyringsmatter
I wonder who they traded.Good move by the Dodgers
Blah blah blah
You contradicted yourself
Eric D.
Lets see how foolish dombrowski looks compared to this deal
parkdav
Remember Kimbrel is with Sox for 3 years. Chapman would have been just 1. But yeah, still think Sox payed too much for Kimbrel.
onlyringsmatter
people keep saying that.Still not true
seamaholic 2
What’s not true?
Eric D.
Margot was arguably the best all around prospect in the Sox system. He could have easily drawn Tyson Ross by himself. But they ask for Kimbrel?
aprogie
not true at all. Dombrowski obviously would have done that if it was available… you dont think he looked? he probably checked around with everyone and took what he thought was the best deal.
Eric D.
doubt it, because Dombrowski only cares about name value, not actual value. No casual Boston fan knows who Tyson Ross is, but most everybody knows who Craig Kimbrel is. He also knew he wanted David Price. He probably just accepted the Padres first offer and went with it.
onlyringsmatter
Let’s not overrate Margot.Please stop just stop talking about our farm system in that way.Margot was not even top 5 in talent
Eric D.
Even if he isn’t top 5, the ranking doesn’t matter. the talent is what matters. You shouldn’t just give away prospects because you have them.
callinec
WRong! Margot is not the top talent in the Red Sox system. And there is NO WAY he would have returned Tyson Ross. The Red Sox would have jumped on that so fast.
bruinsfan94 2
There is no evidence what you are saying is true at all. There has been no information that Margot could have brought back Ross. It doesn’t make sense. Margot has no where near the talent that Devers, Moncada, and Benintendi have..
doublehans
Margot the best prospect in the sox system? Wow. A lot of baseball people don’t even think he was the best prospect in that Kimbrel trade. Guerra being better. The Red Sox kept their top 4 specs and still got an elite closer controlled for a few years. (And there was NO chance Margot was getting Ross, lol)
A'sfaninUK
Puh-leeze, 3 years of Kimbrel vs 1 of Chapman absolutely cannot be comp’d.
John Murray
That’s pretty comical actually…three affordable years of a stud reliever for a kid who’s barely gotten to AA yet is hardly a reach.
jabmets
Dammit. I wanted him for the mets.
jabmets
Nimmo, neise and a minor league prospect.
rdodger32
LMAO why can he play third right and second you have NO BATS IDIOT
onlyringsmatter
Btw comments section is a joke right now.Can’t see new coments without reloading the page
homeparkdc
Could it be a new intern moving over from fangraphs? Everyone *says*
Eric D.
not to mention getting rid of upvotes and removing the ability to reply after about 4 comments.
A'sfaninUK
Yeah this is wild, what happened???
ATTN: Tim, Steve etc… get on this please
gorav114
So glad he’s not coming to the AL East
184729
No
dirtywater433
Foolish Dombrowski? They acquired 3 years of Kimbrel versus one of Chapman.
bigkempin
People call him foolish for what he gave up for Kimbrel….
seamaholic 2
Really depends on how you value the two prospects they gave up. Both are very young. The Sox could easily have concluded that neither is going to be a star.
tac3
People are really overvaluing prospects… the Phillies traded away a lot of prospects from 2007-2011… None of them have really comeback to haunt them…. Actually they one that they kept, Dom Brown, haunts them the most.
Carrasco has probably performed the best… but i’ll take Cliff Lee for him sure.. Singleton on the astros was supposed to burn them…nope, not yet. Now the OF they gave could, but … 2 prospects out of 15+…. for Lee, Halladay, Oswalt, and Pence? Yeah ill do it everytime. Not to mention the players they got back in return for trading Lee, Pence, and Voctorino. They got squat. Soooo Good move by the Dodgers.
Eric D.
So because of that we should just trade all the prospects? What if one of those prospects was Trout or Harper? Boston traded young prospect Jeff Bagwell for a relief pitcher back in the 90’s. how’d that turn out? Or what about when Seattle traded Adam Jones for Erik Bedard? These are just two examples, there’s plenty more.
John Murray
How about that we still have Bogaerts, Betts, Moncada, Shaw, Rodriguez, Owens, Travis….
slasher016
I”m going to guess Alex Verdugo and Jharel Cotton.
BigAlice
Negative. If it’s only two prospects coming back to the Reds, at least one of them is a Top 50 guy. My bet is Peraza and Holmes. We’ll see…
dirtywater433
Sorry if one 2 low A ball prospects and one legitimate aa prospect is deemed too much for Dombrowski to hand out to the best closer in baseball
onlyringsmatter
it’s envy man let it go
Joe McMahon
If you think it’s a good idea to trade two top 70 prospects in the game (one of whom is a top 30) for a pitcher who will throw 60 innings a year, let’s just say that it’s very lucky that you aren’t a GM.
Eric D.
It doesnt matter what level theyre playing at. What matters is their abilities.
Joe McMahon
Barnes and Bellinger might be involved. MAYBE Holmes. I would be surprised if Seager, Urias, De Leon, Pederson or Peraza were involved.
Niekro
Sets up the Dodgers to work like the Yankee’s, One of the two will go into a 2 inning Betances role when needed, they can greatly shorten games when needed now. Being able to shorten games when Kershaw isn’t on the mound is huge. I love this move for the Dodgers.
bleumagicc
Yes!!!
Gardner_012
I wonder who is going to be a set up man now
seamaholic 2
I don’t think Chapman will be on the Dodgers roster on OD. Either that or Jansen won’t. They’re pulling the same thing they pulled last year with Heaney: Acquire a desirable asset, and flip for what you really want.
I bet one of the two of them ends up somewhere else and another mid-rotation starter ends up on the Dodgers.
Gardner_012
I thought from the start of they got him they’d flip him or send away Jansen, I don’t think either of them would take to kindly to. Being a set up man after being dominant closers
AGAVE
Unfortunately, 1 season too late. He could have made a difference here in LA this past post season.
BigAlice
What the Reds got in return is going to say a lot about what the rest of their off season looks like. If they got anyone that’s close to Major League ready, it will mean they are trying to compete now, if it’s ‘2017 or ’18 type guys, then get ready for a full blown fire sale with Bruce and Frazier out the door in the next few days.
hojostache
LAD is going all in. It better cost them two top prospects or CIN will look bad, again.
justinept
Tough to say they’re going all-in when they lost, arguable, the best free agent pitcher to a division rival. Say what you want about not giving a record AAV over years to a 32-year old pitcher, but a real ‘all-in’ approach says they’d have kept Greinke for whatever it took … because that’s what ‘all-in’ means.
Eric D.
Not sure if signing Iwakuma to replace Grienke can be considered going all in. Not saying it was a bad move, but theyre certainly playing conservatively in terms of free agency
tim815
Holmes and ?
slasher016
Bats bats bats. Reds are loaded with pitching in the high minors.
wigisdead
I feel a flip coming…
seamaholic 2
DingDingDing
We have a winner.
Joe 59
Storen/Papelbon 2.0
legend27
Cincinnati got robbed
slasher016
Without knowing what they got?
A'sfaninUK
lol these comments are insane, is legend27 a bot?!?
jmac1984
How? We don’t even know the return yet. I’m hoping Holmes or Verdugo is in the return as a Reds fan.
southi
I said yesterday that Peraza would likely be dealt. Just as the braves saw, the Dodgers too have realized that he still has a lot of holes in his game that probably won’t get fixed. Most notable among those the fact he very seldom walks so must rely on extremely high BABIP so that his speed becomes a factor on the basepaths. In the long run I expect him to be at best a decent utility player unless he learns to take a walk more frequently.
dhud
Do you know something the rest of the world doesn’t? Because I’m pretty sure the players haven’t been announced yet
Eric D.
What is this terrible new comments system??? You have to click show comment on literally EVERY comment? Who’s bright idea was that?
Priggs89
Agreed – this is horrible
dirtywater433
Margot isn’t even close to the best all around prospect to the the Sox system before being traded.
Espinoza, Benintendi, Moncada, Devers, and maybe Kopech are better players.
Eric D.
Moncada is the only one who challenges for best ALL AROUND player, and when talking about all around position players you can’t really discuss pitchers, especially Kopech who for all we know hasn’t pitched without an illegal substance yet.. Devers is a bat first third baseman. Defense is an afterthought for him. Benintendi is also pretty offensive oriented.as well. Margot is the whole package.
spendav199
Benintendi is the best player in Boston’s system mark my words. Think Jacoby ellsbury type bat and speed with a Joey Votto type understanding of the strike zone. He will be much more of a sure thing than even Moncada. The guy is an absolute gamer and ballplayer, never takes an at bat off. Boston made this move knowing all of this. Btw I’m not a Sox fan
rycm131
Any chance the Dodgers might stretch Chapman out to being a starter again? I hate seeing pitchers that are so dominant used as relievers. Even if his numbers dropped and he was say a 3.00 era with 10k per, that would be an upper echelon starter.
DodgerBlue83
I doubt it, stretching pitchers back out usually isn’t a one year process and he is only signed for one year.
dodger
I’d wager that Pederson is in the deal.
pustule bosey
I wouldn’t be surprised if either pederson or puig was in the trade
jakegreenberg24
Chapman for Peraza and Holmes is probably the deal. Guessing one of the following deals for Jose Fernandez is made:
Red Sox trade Wade Miley, Eduardo Rodriguez, Xander Bogaerts
Marlins trade Jose Fernandez
Twins trade Byron Buxton and Jose Berrios
Marlins trade Jose Fernandez
Rangers trade Chi Chi Gonzalez, Joey Gallo, Jurickson Profar, and Nomar Mazara
Marlins trade Marcell Ozuna and Jose Fernandez
Cubs trade Eloy Jimenez, Javier Baez, and Jorge Soler
Marlins trade Jose Fernandez
Dodgers trade Julio Urias and Corey Seager
Marlins trade Jose Fernandez and AJ Ramos
onlyringsmatter
LOl Xander Bogaerts for Jose Fernandez.Like Red Sox would ever ever think let alone do that.
rycm131
As a Redsox fan I think you have rose colored glasses in Xander. Much like when ESPN would have updates on the bottom line for JBJ as if he was the second coming of Mickey Mantle. He was later sent back to the minors that year.
Eric D.
Why do the Red Sox get to give up way less than any other team?
onlyringsmatter
you have a problem with the Red Sox?What is it?I am truly curious?
Eric D.
Well, I’m a Red Sox fan, so nope no problem. I’m just realistic. It’s pretty ridiculous to assume that the Rangers return of Chi Chi, Gallo, Profar, and Mazara is equal to Bogaerts E-rod and Miley.
kherz23
The Red Sox would not trade Xander
A'sfaninUK
Thanks for being realistic and not a homer who thinks a team can trade trash for treasure.
charles stevens
The Rangers would make that move. I can’t see the fish agreeing to it. I think the Rangers are more concerned with making minor additions to complete the foundation in place. Can’t see them making a splashy move this offseason unless its for Lucroy.
charles stevens
Gotta love hot stove baseball season. You just can’t get it off the brain.
christo14
There are reports that the dodgers are the mystery team for zobrist, so maybe one of the prospects is Peraza (which seems likely anyways). Then the Dodgers make a play for zobrist as their everyday 2B? Just spitballing…
Admiral Rusty T. Shackleford
I was thinking the same thing.
James7430
People put too much value on “prospects.” For every Harper, Trout, or Harvey, there are 100 Lastings Milledges, Mike Olt’s, and Matt LaPorta’s. It’s hard to fully gauge the value at the onset of the trade. If LA ends up winning a ring, some would say it was worth it even IF one or both of the prospects turn out to be great major leaguers. Likewise with Cincinnati.
Admiral Rusty T. Shackleford
Absolutely no one thought those 3 prospects you mentioned to turn out that good.
bobo678
milledge and laporta were as close to untouchable to the mets and brewers as any players could have been….I remember laporta and one other fringe guys was traded for sabathia and mike Brantley….
The Oregonian
Yeah, remember how people thought Harper was only going to be a platoon player?
nixon07
Eric is just another delusional sports fan. Who has all the answers. Yet he’s sitting on mlb trade rumors, like the rest of us. It’s shocking he isn’t working in a front office somewhere. Oh yeah they don’t hire………… I will be nice and leave the insult out.
Eric D.
hahaha ok man.
whitemule70
Say hello to a closer controversy in LA. Look at what happened to the Nats after they traded for a closer. Not the best use of LA’s resources, probably.
rick5ful
Your comment makes no sense.
22Leo
Look what happens when anyone acquires Papelbon. I don’t think that situation is relevant to what the Dodgers are doing.
mkeving
Nah, the Nats Papelbon situation wasn’t caused by having two closers but by having one Papelbon.
Cam
Brilliantly accurate.
lacherj
If the Reds do not get MLB ready talent in this trade is a loss for the Reds. (which the past couple of years seems to be the norm! I like how the Dodgers have all this MLB ready talent… yet they keep wanting to get verterns… but do not want to part with what they have?
The Reds came into this offseason saying they want young MLB ready talent. If they don’t I think its a waste of time. They have enough young pitching.. I would go after young bats. Like a Seager or a Pederson.. if they don’t get at least 1 MLB ready player this deal is a waste and the Dodgers will be laughing their asses off.
joshbresser
Nobody would give Pederson or Seager for one year of a relief pitcher. That is laughable.
A'sfaninUK
“MLB-ready talent” and “rebuilding” almost never are in the same sentence. The Reds need to be punting 2016 and shooting to be good in 2017, which they absolutely can be.
pustule bosey
pederson and seager are arguably both rebuild and ready material –
A'sfaninUK
Agreed, but they aren’t getting Seager for any package the Reds could feasibly put together. Pederson might be the one.
BigAlice
DeSclafani for Latos, and Suarez for Simon…
You’re kidding. Right?
The Reds fleeced the Marlins last winter and then got a starting bat from the Tigers for a guy that was signed as a reclamation project. Then they turned a couple months of Cueto into 3 MLB ready arms. And the best of all the deals might end up being Mella and Duvall for Marlon Byrd.
It’s hard to find fault with any of that. Seriously.
yanks02026
This would be a good idea for what the Yankees could get for Miller.
R.D.
Well, trading peraza would open up the possibility of the Dodgers signing Kendrick. They would really deepen their current lineup.
BlueSkyLA
A real possibility. The silence on Kendrick (who should be one of the most talked-about free agents in this offseason) is deafening, He’s looking like the dog that did not bark.
22Leo
If my neighbors have dogs, I always hope it is that one.
WeggieJackson44
Feel one heading to the Marlins in a deal for Fernandez
williamg
Wonder who they traded
A'sfaninUK
3+ hours with no new info? Anyone wanna bet this deal was prematurely announced?
joshbresser
It seems like details of Reds-involved trades always take forever to get out. This is normal, I think.
A'sfaninUK
How can a trade be announced but the players aren’t? Why even announce the trade as happened when it hasn’t happened?
petcopadre
because among journalists, it’s always important to be the “first to break the story.” Dumb, I know but true.
mfdesquire
This could be another Cueto situation. Recall that the Reds had a trade agreement with the Royals (and Cueto was scratched from his start that night), but then another team came in at the last minute and made a better offer. So Cincinnati voided the agreed-upon trade by claiming that one of the players they were to receive failed the medical reports. Cueto started that night, and the Reds then got the Royals to sweeten the deal a bit..
Could that be happening here?
A'sfaninUK
Nope! I was right! The Dodgers brass announced it and jumped the gun without the Reds agreeing to a deal.
Mikel Grady
If Cubs could get Fernandez for Jimenez soler Baez I’d be happy. Sign heyward or Gordon. Castro stays at second or get Murphy/zobrist.
raef715
i want to see the reaction of Chapman or Jansen when they found out they arent a closer anymore…or better yet when they both get told they are “co-closers”..
when you have a great closer and need everything else in your bullpen, going out and getting another great closer just doesnt see like the optimal solution.
gamemusic3 2
Or the Dodgers end the ridiculous idea of a ‘closer.’
These 2 are a great excuse to explain to the players relief will be handled by matchups.
Cam
Absolutely. The notion of the “closer” is extremely outdated – “high leverage reliever” is the way forward.
Had the closer label been thrown away earlier, maybe Pedro Baez – probably the Dodgers fourth best reliever on the post-season roster, wouldn’t have pitched in the most important spot of the series.
justinept
Try convincing a player that saves aren’t important in his walk year…
mrshyguy99
Well dodgers really want to improve. It a weird move since they have Jensen but that why I’m not a gm. I’m guessing if they keep both Jensen will be the set up man. I’m just glad Seager Leon or Urias aren’t being traded
puigpower
If you’re a fan you know the pen was bad last season
mrshyguy99
I know the pen was bad but it just seem odd to have two top closers. Plus who knows if it will work out
slasher016
The Reds already wanted to move Phillips due to having both Cozart and Suarez for the middle infield, so I don’t see how this “escalates” it.
nick 20
I am assuming you mean why would Peraza be an option as a piece in return since they already want to move Phillips?? I wonder if they would take Peraza in return because Frazier would be soon to follow and then either Saurez, Peraza, or Cozart would slide to 3rd.
cards1
Interesting. Now what to do with Jansen and Chapman.
mrshyguy99
Well there saying keep both. But who knows if either one will be ok not closing
Rickey O'Sunnyvale
Shared closing based on handedness and who’s coming up in the 8th and 9th..
bleumagicc
Was thinking this earlier.
jd396
The emperor is pleased
ew032
Like the move as long as the price paid wasn’t too great. Hopefully they hold onto Holmes as he projects as a power arm top of the rotation type. Would rather include Zack Lee or Chris Anderson.
A'sfaninUK
This is insane. What is taking so long? Even announce WHY there’s a holdup!
BlueSkyLA
Impatient much? This trade rumor isn’t based on any announcement, just one tweet that itself is only a couple of hours old.
A'sfaninUK
No, I wasn’t impatient – you NEVER see trades announced with 6+ hours going by without anything about both sides of the deal. This was a fake trade from moment one: the Dodgers clearly jumped the gun in alerting this to the press.
double
The Matt Kemp deal went over a week without either side confirming there was one.
BlueSkyLA
Who says the Dodgers alerted the press?
A'sfaninUK
Also this new commenting system is really, really, really, REALLY bad.
charles stevens
Yes, its absolutely terrible
wilymo
i would upvote this, but, i can’t
vamosbravos
Your move, Bobby Evans.
g55s
Giants don’t need a closer,. Other holes to fill. LF and SP
petcopadre
what do you think if Puig was included in this deal?
Jon429
I’m going to laugh pretty hard if Arizona swoops in and gets him at the last minute
mrnatewalter
That would be absolutely amazing.
rayrayner
We were thinking the same thing, but I think LA will still be better long term.
WrongVerb
At this point Pollack better be the return
chesteraarthur
Uh, why?
AidanVega123
You either completely undervalue Pollock or completely overvalue Chapman. As dominant as Chapman is, he would be just a starting point in a Pollock trade.
rayrayner
Wouldn’t be funny if the Dbacks swooped in?
brandonmarin
Dbacks should swoop In again, that would make my Christmas. Dodgers crying, dbacks cheering.
dhud
But wait, according to all the keyboard GMs on here it was a done deal of Peraza and Holmes?
The Oregonian
Good one. I’d upvote, but, you know.
AsFan89
^ Upvote
charles stevens
Reds are just leaking that too get Dodgers to budge on the guy they want.
eric9690
With Jensen being the current closer why weren’t they pursuing a starter more than closer? I hope they won’t rely on Alex wood Bolsinger and Anderson to make up for greinke leaving
Cam
These guys get paid millions – they can multi-task.
wilymo
never trust people from cincinnati. i’ve always said so
BlueSkyLA
Anybody who puts chili on their spaghetti has to be watched.
charles stevens
Good point.
dhud
You know, I’m from Cincinnati but…fair point lol
greatd
Wonder who the mystery teams are but considering the price tag.
I think there will be other teams like the Diamondbacks and Cubs who could swoop in.
Drank
Astros could be in it. They’re pitcher “rich” in the minors plus they have Tony Kemp who is blocked by Jose Altuve.
greatd
Completely agree.
Man if they get him they’ll be up there to win the world series that’s for sure.
WrongVerb
Reds need hitters. Bregman and P.Tucker should suffice
kman5000
Ultimate troll if the D’backs swoop in. Doubt it but still.
joshbresser
Why are the Reds so incompetent?
ctrenkamp
I know, right. Why can’t they just make a trade and not review the prospects medical reports?
joshbresser
That’s not the problem.
Money113
Reds with their best DeAndre Jordan impersonation … SMH
jmac1984
Looks like this is on the Dodgers