The Mets surprised in 2015, taking a weak NL East over a disappointing Nationals club and then streaking all the way to the World Series. Getting back is hardly assured, but the organization is as well situated as any for another run.
Guaranteed Contracts
- David Wright, 3B: $87MM through 2020
- Curtis Granderson, OF: $31MM through 2017
- Juan Lagares, OF: $23MM through 2019 (including buyout of 2020 club option)
- Michael Cuddyer, OF: $12.5MM through 2016
- Jon Niese, SP: $10MM through 2016 (including buyouts of 2017-18 club options)
Arbitration Eligibles (projections via MLB Trade Rumors)
- Ruben Tejada (4.171) – $2.5MM
- Lucas Duda (4.137) – $6.8MM
- Addison Reed (4.002) – $5.7MM
- Carlos Torres (3.114) – $800K
- Jenrry Mejia (3.085) – $2.6MM
- Matt Harvey (3.072) – $4.7MM
- Jeurys Familia (3.030) – $3.3MM
- Josh Edgin (3.015) – $600K
- Non-tender candidates: Tejada, Mejia
Options
- None
Free Agents
- Jerry Blevins, Yoenis Cespedes, Tyler Clippard, Bartolo Colon, Kelly Johnson, Eric O’Flaherty, Bobby Parnell, Juan Uribe, Eric Young, Daniel Murphy (rejected QO)
It all starts with the rotation for GM Sandy Alderson and newly-extended skipper Terry Collins. The youth, talent, and recent track record of the arms assembled — high-performing youngsters Jacob deGrom, Matt Harvey, Noah Syndergaard, and Steven Matz; veteran Jon Niese; and a recovering Zach Wheeler — suggests that the unit could be special.
If there’s a question about that staff, it’s probably whether last year’s workload will impact next year’s health and effectiveness. Harvey drew most of the headlines in that regard, throwing a career-high 216 innings (including the post-season) in his first season back from Tommy John surgery. But deGrom (+37 1/3 innings) and especially Syndergaard (+65 2/3) went well over their largest prior single-season innings tally. And all the pitchers will be looking to bounce back from a shortened layoff after a deep postseason run.
That concern will likely motivate the organization to maintain depth. But the club has already shown at least some willingness to move arms when the need arose: Wheeler was set to be shipped out in the failed Carlos Gomez deal, while Michael Fulmer was one of several young pitchers that ultimately were traded over the summer.
And we’ve yet to see any indication that the organization is lining up for a significant payroll increase. Last year, the Mets topped $100MM on Opening Day for the first time since 2011, and there’s probably about $80MM already committed to 2016. There’s less on the books down the line, but a host of outstanding players will be reaching arbitration eligibility and (hopefully) commanding big raises.
It remains interesting to consider, then, whether any pitching assets could be cashed in to facilitate upgrades elsewhere. The most obvious candidate, perhaps, is Niese, whose salary could be re-allocated. But that would remove a layer of security and could require the signing of a swingman type to provide depth. Bartolo Colon has done enough to command a rotation spot, and he won’t likely be cheap, but he’ll be available for a short-term commitment and a return hasn’t been ruled out.
There are some recently-injured arms to consider, too. Youngster Rafael Montero might also be somewhat expendable and would represent a useful trade chip — if he can show that he’s back to full health. It may be less likely at this point, but Wheeler could still be used to help the Mets fill a hole elsewhere. He has the youth, contract control, and upside to be a major piece for a significant addition, though the risk of his Tommy John recovery holds down his value.
The most intriguing, but least likely, scenario involves the four young pitchers who are slated for the 2016 rotation. They’re all huge assets that are valued as such by the Mets. We’ve heard no indication that a trade is a serious consideration, and it’s impossible to imagine a deal at this point that didn’t involve a high-end, controllable young player who could slot right into the New York lineup at a position of need. Matz is arguably the most susceptible to a trade, if only because he’s less established, but there’s a reasonable argument to be made that the club should cash in Harvey now.
One alternative to trading arms is to double down with an extension. Harvey is the closest to free agency, but the Boras client seems unlikely to forgo free agency (thus increasing the appeal of the trade concept). Syndergaard appears worthy of long-term consideration, but both he and the team may want to let things play out a bit more before committing. That leaves deGrom as the candidate who makes the most sense on paper. He wouldn’t be the first 1+ service-time pitcher to sign an extension, as Ricky Romero, Julio Teheran, and Madison Bumgarner have already set a market. It seems likely that the Mets would need to beat Bumgarner’s record $35MM guarantee for a 1+ arm — and not by a little bit — to get something done. Not only has deGrom been unbelievably good (2.61 ERA), he’s also a solid Super Two candidate (1.139 years of service). While deGrom is relatively old at 27, Bumgarner’s pre-2012 contract is rather out of date given the still-rising cost of pitching.
The biggest pitching needs for the Mets probably come in the bullpen. Jeurys Familia turned into a late-inning monster last year, but he has racked up 155 1/3 innings over the last two regular seasons and threw another 14 2/3 in the postseason. He’d probably be pairing with Jenrry Mejia in the late innings, but that talented right-hander could be headed for a non-tender after twice being busted for PEDs. (Either way, he’ll miss about half of 2016 to serve his suspension.) The club does have another set-up option in Addison Reed, who showed a nice turnaround after coming to New York last summer. He’ll be expensive thanks to his steep arbitration starting point, but indications are that the Mets will tender Reed a contract.
Another late-inning righty might be nice, though Hansel Robles had a very nice rookie campaign and Carlos Torres could bounce back from a rough 2015. But left-handed relief is the bigger need. Sean Gilmartin was a nice surprise as a Rule 5 pick-up, and he’ll take one spot. The resurgent Josh Smoker joins Dario Alvarez as 40-man southpaw options, Josh Edgin could return later in the year from Tommy John surgery, and a reunion with injured hurler Jerry Blevins is said to be a consideration. But there’s every reason for the club to pursue a reliable lefty arm. There are several free agents that could fit the bill, led by Antonio Bastardo and Tony Sipp.
Any money spent in the pen, though, would likely reduce the free cash that could be used to pursue upgrades elsewhere. While the club doesn’t have any gaping voids in its lineup, there are certainly areas that could use improvement — especially for an organization that is looking to seize a rare window in which it enjoys cheap and outstanding starting pitching.
When the Mets locked up Juan Lagares last winter, they surely expected he’d be an every day option in center. But that’s now in question, leaving the team weighing a left-handed-hitting complement — if not something more. A player like Will Venable could make sense as a fourth outfielder. If the club wants to add someone for more regular duty, it could be well-positioned to seek value (and take on some health risk) in Denard Span or to swing a trade for Ben Revere of the Blue Jays, Ender Inciarte of the D’backs, or Charlie Blackmon of the Rockies. Free agent Gerardo Parra might stand as a middle-ground option who could function more as a traditional fourth outfielder or take near-regular reps, as circumstances dictate.
Of course, it’s also still at least conceivable that the club could look to shake things up further. The clamor to bring back Yoenis Cespedes seems to have died down. (A return never seemed terribly plausible anyway.) But there are other possibilities. The very top of the market is probably out of reach, but if New York is willing to relegate Lagares to a pure fourth outfielder role, then Dexter Fowler could be a match. (Unlike Span, the switch-hitting Fowler — who hits lefties better than righties — doesn’t make for a natural platoon pairing.) And there’s always the possibility of dealing Lagares, who could hold appeal to teams that believe in him and have a need up the middle. Dealing Lagares after an off year is probably not the optimal scenario from a long-term value perspective, but the Mets’ surprising World Series run has changed the calculus somewhat.
Whoever is added could also see some time in the corners, where Curtis Granderson is aging and Michael Conforto is still not fully established despite a very promising partial season debut. Michael Cuddyer is also still a factor in the outfield, of course, though one wonders whether he’ll need to find more of his time at first base, as an interleague DH, and as a bench bat. Lucas Duda will be expected to continue handling the lion’s share of the time at first, but Cuddyer presents a good option to spell him when southpaws take the hill.
The major complication in the corner infield is David Wright. Some have wondered whether he’ll continue to be a viable defensive option at third with his throws visibly hampered by his back issues. It may be too soon to pull the plug on Wright’s days at third, but he could ultimately follow the path of Ryan Zimmerman of moving across the diamond in the midst of a major extension. At the very least, the Mets need to have some contingency plan in place in the event that Wright’s rather serious back issues cause problems once again.
Wright’s situation only adds to the intrigue up the middle. There’s no shortage of options, but there’s little in the way of certainty. Once-maligned, now heroic shortstop Ruben Tejada may be non-tendered after his bad-luck broken leg in the post-season. Trade deadline redemption man Wilmer Flores was moved off that position late in the year and seems to profile better at second or third. Top shortstop prospect Amed Rosario only just turned 20 and still needs to conquer the upper minors, but Gavin Cecchini and Matt Reynolds are close and ready, respectively. Another highly-regarded youngster, Dilson Herrera, didn’t light the world on fire in his first big league stint but is line for another chance. And Eric Campbell and Danny Muno could factor at second (or, if needed, third).
Given that array of options, there are several approaches that the front office could consider. Holding pat, certainly, is one. Signing Ben Zobrist or even bringing back Daniel Murphy would provide an immediate option at second and/or third, but both free agents are expected to command $12MM or more annually over reasonably lengthy terms. Adding a second baseman, moreover, would likely leave the team with some combination of Flores and Reynolds at short while blocking Herrera. The shortstop market also offers possibilities. Ian Desmond is the biggest (and most expensive) name, but veteran stopgaps like Alexei Ramirez and Jimmy Rollins could also make some sense.
It’s also worth wondering whether the Mets could consider trading from its stockpile of middle infielders — especially if a veteran is brought in. We already know that New York is willing to part with Flores, at least in certain circumstances, since he would’ve been the other key piece (with Wheeler) in the nearly-completed Gomez deal. The younger players listed above hold varying degrees of appeal, and one could conceivably be cashed in — possibly in concert with other pieces — to add anything from an established bullpen arm to a center field-capable outfielder.
There’s another area of some depth that could provide Alderson with a trade chip: the catching position. Travis d’Arnaud seems to have cemented himself as the starter heading into 2016 after battling through injury to slash .268/.340/.485 last season. Both d’Arnaud and Kevin Plawecki drew strong defensive ratings last year, but the latter player — a younger, less experienced option who was pressed into big league duty — didn’t quite prove up to the task. Plawecki, though, still has plenty of promise and trade value, and New York could always rely on Johnny Monell and/or a veteran addition to serve as a reserve option behind d’Arnaud.
Financial constraints still limit the Mets’ maneuverability, and it’s fair for fans of the club to wonder when those restrictions will truly be loosened. (And also to dream on what kind of roster could be compiled this winter with a payroll befitting a New York-based franchise.) But even if the cash outlay will remain modest, there are plenty of creative options available to allow the Mets to capitalize on a good, cheap core and build a roster that can compete for another NL East title — and hope to achieve more.
Time2Scott
Didn’t Edgin get picked up by the Cubs?
Jeff Todd
You must be thinking of Leathersich.
chri
Youre confusing Edgin with Leathersich, they’re both LH relievers who had TJ surgery
jules
No mention of Daniel Murphy among the Free Agents, Reason?
Jeff Todd
Well, I mentioned him in the post, but I guess I somehow forgot to put him on the list. That’s the reason. We’ll get him on there where he belongs.
aff10
D’Arnaud seems to be emerging as an elite young catcher, if he can stay healthy consistently. I’m curious though as to what value Plawecki has on the trade market? I assume as a promising young catcher that he could pull in a nice piece, but a solid starting SS or CF?
Ruben_Tomorrow 2
The problem with d’Arnaud is that he’s incredibly fragile and has raised questions about his future as a catcher. I don’t think it’s a crazy idea to consider Plawecki as the Mets catcher in the near future. He definitely needs more playing time in the big leagues to see if he’s ready to hit. His bat did not look ready last season and he never really got to go back to the minors to work on things as he was made the primary backup catcher once d’Arnaud returned from the DL.
slider32
Agreed, d’Arnaud is injury prone along with Wright, he also needs to work on throwing runners out.
hojostache
He’s had multiple injuries, though they seem to be more random and not chronic. It still matters though bc he is a catcher and he needs to show he can stay healthy…so moving Plaw seems like a bad idea until the Mets can see more from Travis.
portopotti
The mets pitching is outstanding and with another year in the big leagues together should be better. I’m curious though why there was no mention of exactly how much Cespedes brought to this team and how he transformed the worst offense into the best almost single handedly. Where/how exactly is that bat going to be replaced? Conforto although promising, might be a realistic 15-20hr for a full season.
nymlagares
If Conforto continues to produce like he did and improves, d’Arnaud can stay healthy, and David Wright can play about 90-100 games it would help alleviate the loss of Cespedes. It wasn’t single-handedly Cespedes as they got a bunch of guys back with him and a lot of guys stepped up in the second half as well
portopotti
Cespedes transformed that lineup. I agree a full season of dArnaud could help alleviate the loss. I’m not expecting much from wright and its unfortunately the position that I think we could make the most impactful change.
The mets are also losing (probably) offense when Herrera takes over at second for Murphy.
stymeedone
really? replacing Wright could make the most impactful change? Have you really looked at what’s starting at 3B in the majors? Freese would not be an improvement and he’s the best FA. Better to hope for a healthy Wright.
portopotti
Yes, replacing Wright would be the most impactful change. From both an offensive and defensive standpoint. Surprised you’re even debating this.
While Freese is available, so is Frazier.
Jeff Todd
I don’t believe that Alderson is thinking about it that way. He wasn’t even thinking about it that way when he traded for Cespedes. They kind of hit the lottery with that deal. You say “sweet” and get back to business.
Think of it this way: suppose they had added, I don’t know, Gerardo Parra instead of Cespedes. He wasn’t so great. Would you be sitting here asking about how to get that kind of production back into the lineup? Maybe, maybe not, but it wouldn’t be tied to what they “lost” or what needs to be “replaced.”
I don’t mean to be dismissive, if this comes across that way. I’m just trying to explain why I don’t think it’s particularly relevant to look at this team’s situation through the lens of Cespedes’s departure.
(Also, I don’t really agree that his effect extended that far beyond what he produced in his own at-bats. He had an incredible individual performance. Numerous other players also had improved performances and/or were added/returned from injury.)
kbarr888
Cespedes may have not “single-handedly” carried the Mets to the playoffs, but it’s the presence of “that type of bat” that changes the dynamic of a lineup. Without that type of power somewhere in the lineup, there’s a lack of fear for the opposing pitcher. There is an intangible benefit of that big bat making everyone else better. The Mets are definitely set in the pitching dept……but they do need to sign a player who brings an offensive threat. Although Wheeler gives them a solid 5 man rotation, he’s also their best trade chip to bring back some star power. In light of Puig’s most recent troubles, maybe LA is ready to move him? Castro, Baez, and Alcantara are all probably available from the Cubs (pick one plus a prospect or 2). Jay Bruce is still available, but he’ll cost Wheeler, without addressing the needs at 2B & SS. (Can’t Matt Reynolds hold down 2B at least???). Fact is, they DO need to sign an impact bat, or they are not the same team that made the playoffs.
hojostache
I like the creativity of considering different options out there to improve the Mets’ lineup, but I’m not sure if they would be a true upgrade.
Castro…ugh, no. Let someone else deal w. his barely replacement level production. Yes he had some good early years, but 2 of his last 3 yrs were meh.
Baez…probably too expensive now, though I really like his upside. If they pulled the trigger earlier last year when Baez was really struggling it could have been a nice get, but not now for Wheeler/Matz…which you know the Cubs will push.
Alcantara…don’t know much, so I’ll defer to others.
J. Bruce..the Mets already have him…his name is Lucas Duda.
Seeing what Happ got, the value of a controllable young arm just keeps going up and up. The Mets need to hold onto their young arms, sign Murphy or Zobrist, and add a couple of elite BP arms. I know, it is asking a lot…but that is what they need to be a serious threat in the playoffs in ’16.
portopotti
Single-handedly was a reach, lol.
They definitely hit the lottery but you also then saw the trickle down effect from Cespedes being in that lineup. Maybe that’s part of where we differ as you don’t think he had anymore of an impact except simply his at bats.
They don’t have Cespedes, they probably don’t make the playoffs. His presence in the lineup transformed the team. They needed a power bat, they got one, and they went from worst to first in offense. Primarily due to him.
If they added Parra then no, I wouldn’t be asking about how to get his production into the lineup but that’s not really a fair comparison as they are completely different players serving different purposes. They don’t make the playoffs with Parra.
I guess I’m not understanding why it’s so easy to dismiss what Cespedes did and then to think that everyone will have a better year to offset what he brought, especially with what might amount to essentially the same exact team.
I understand Conforto’s impact, and a full year of d’Arnaud, but where else are you getting power/middle of the order bat. Duda who while streaky still hit 27 HR? Flores or Granderson who both hit fairly well? How much better can you realistically expect from them?
hojostache
Who takes their playoff spot if they didn’t get Cespedes? I still think they make the playoffs, but it would have been a lot closer and I don’t think they would have had the same swagger.
slider32
Yes, I think that Alderson will still be looking for a couple of bargin players instead of an impact player.
slider32
My only concern with the pitching is the amount of innings last year. The Giants won 3 world series in 5 years years with 3 different aces. Lincecum and Cain weren’t able to maintain performance. Wainwright also comes to mind. Pitching is oulier.
donniebaseball
The mets could really use an upgrade at 2nd, ss, and cf. They have Flores and Lagares who are average, but their other (position) players are all just above average (or have significant question marks). They can’t just have a bunch of average players throughout their lineup. They need someone elite in that lineup.
nymlagares
Flores played well last year and especially down the stretch, I would consider him above average at either middle infield position and Dilson Herrera looks strong at 2B and would be a cheap replacement for Murphy. I agree with the CF upgrade, but I think Lagares will rebound but you can’t bank on that when you need to compete
stymeedone
Beats having below average players.
donniebaseball
Haha very true!
FosterChirps
Inciarte would be a great fit and probably reasonable to acquire. Is he actually on the market though?
Jeff Todd
There’s been a lot of chatter on Dbacks outfielders. Seems trading him isn’t their first choice – said to be a high asking price – but I think he’s in play.
Ray Ray
I don’t see the upside of non-tendering Mejia. He is an awesome pitcher when he is available and you won’t even have to pay half of his estimated salary. Tender him and if you don’t need him, you might get something for him at the deadline. Of course I have never seen a team with too many good bullpen arms.
alphakira 2
I mean, considering his best friend on the team, Familia spoke out against him and several people called him selfish, I don’t think it’s worth bringing back a guy that won’t be too well liked in the clubhouse and one that already had 2 strikes in 1 year.
hojostache
I agree with all of this…but I’d still consider giving him a ST invite. If he can catch lightning in a bottle, then he could still be worth his history. If the Mets go out and sign 2 elite RPs and decide to drop him…so be it, but if they roll w. their current arms, I think it’d be a mistake to not even see how he does in ST.
FosterChirps
Any idea what it would cost the Mets for Inciarte or Blackmon?
Jeff Todd
DBacks would want MLB-ready pitching, I’m guessing. Rox might be a bit more flexible in terms of the type of return.
Either way, I think those teams will look for a strong return.
hojostache
Too bad Montero had multiple phantom injuries at the end of last year, as he’d be a good candidate to dangle. He has good stuff and peripherals, but he isn’t showing that he can stay healthy and contribute at the major league level.
Colton530
The Mets should re-sign Yoienous Cespendes but I don’t think they will because off how much money he wants but the should go for Alex Gordon because he’s got pop and he can field and was not want that much being on a team like the Mets
slider32
Gordon and Zobrist seem to be the best value picks, everyone is going bid on them which will bring their price up.
hojostache
Or Span. I’d love Gordon in their lineup…but he’ll still probably get $80-$100m…too rich for the Coupons.
Colton530
The Blue Jays should go for Jordan Zimmerman or Jonny Cueto because they are David Price just throwing righty and they will play get and I know they cost a lot but they lost David Price and need a good ace
slider32
Both the Jays and Sox need an ace to win.
hojostache
Zimmerman isn’t an Ace though. He has shown some abilities, but he is pitching like a #3 with #2 upside. Cueto…I can’ quite figure him out. He can look lights out, and then other nights…very very pedestrian. His multiple arm angles and varied deliveries must be a nightmare for a pitching coach. I can see him fizzling out, though I hope he doesn’t.
3Tavgreg
The Mets should re-sign Johnson and maybe Uribe if they can get them cheap for 1 year.
Then sign Parra if they can get him for the 3 year 21-23 mill range. He can platoon with
Lagares in CF, and allow Cuddyear to rotate in spelling Conforto, Granderson and Duda
against Lefties. Throw in another Lefty RP as mentioned above and you have enough
bench help then. Mix in Herrara and Reynolds when they’re ready and they should be OK
even if Wright misses time again. You could also turn Gilmartin back into a starter and use him as a 6th starter or in spot situations to keep the big 4’s innings down early on,
as long as they’re near the top of their division standings
kbarr888
Johnson and Uribe are good value signjngs, they shouldn’t be too expensive to carry as bench bats. No way Parra signs for $7 mil/yr……he’ll command 4/36 at least (no draft pick attatched, he’s only 28 and looking for a full time job……SF is interested, so are others). The rest of your ideas result in an extremely mediocre team (your statement “they should be ok”….is what they’ll be. ….just ok). No way they are “near the top of their division” if they follow that plan.
hojostache
This is the most realistic (and cheapest) approach I’d find palatable. I wouldn’t like it, but I could see ownership pushing this “compromise everywhere” approach.
cyclone24
Why don’t the Mets trade Duda , Wheeler, Lagares , and Niese,to the Braves and get Freeman, Markakis, Nd either Adonis Garcia Or Jayce Peterson. This is why it works for both teams . It gives the mets a better contact , speedier, defensive lineup . And 2 less Mets killers in Freeman and Peterson . And for the Braves it gives them a 1 or 2 pitcher Wheeler a good LH in Niese a good CF who need a diff change and a younger just as good power 1B man who is as good defensively . Think of this lineup
Markakis CF
Granderson RF
Conforto LF
Freeman 1B
Wright 3B
D’Arnaud C
Flores SS or 2b
Peterson 2b or SS
hojostache
Too many players, these types of deals RARELY happen and even more rarely actually work. Niese is signed below market value (check his stats, he’s a #3/#4 getting paid as a #5), Duda is very inexpensive for his production (Almost 60HR in 2 yrs, that is a short list of players), and Lagares would be trading low on a hurt former GG’er. I admittedly want to keep Wheeler unless absolutely blown away (which I don’t expect for a guy coming back from TJS). Yes..I’m a Mets fan, but that doesn’t change the above considerations.
cyclone24
Of cause u can change lineup around
busmannyc
has anyone considered pedro alvarez as a 1b/3b option for the mets? you are going to get 25-30hr & about 90 rbi from him at citifield. you can package duda & some of the mets extra baggage “cuddyer, nieuwenheis, campbell, carlos torres” i see it as a win-win for both teams. only thing is he’s a free agent after 2016 season & he’s a SCOTT BORAS client 🙁 i would give it a shot