While the Indians fell shy of the playoffs, the team still managed to win 85 games despite a pair of key rotation losses in the form of Ubaldo Jimenez and Scott Kazmir. As GM of a budget-conscious club, Chris Antonetti will have a limited amount of flexibility as he looks to close the five-game gap that separated his team from the AL Central crown.
Guaranteed Contracts
- Jason Kipnis, 2B: $49.5MM through 2019 (including buyout on 2020 option)
- Nick Swisher, 1B/OF: $30MM through 2016, plus vesting option
- Michael Bourn, OF: $27.5MM through 2016, plus vesting option
- Yan Gomes, C: $21.95MM through 2019 (including buyout on 2020 option)
- Michael Brantley, OF: $20MM through 2017 (including buyout on 2018 option)
- Carlos Santana, 1B/C: $15.45MM through 2016 (including buyout on 2017 option)
- David Murphy, OF: $6.5MM through 2015 (including buyout on 2016 option)
- Ryan Raburn, 2B/OF: $2.6MM through 2015 (including buyout on 2016 option)
Arbitration Eligible Players (service time in parentheses; projections via Matt Swartz)
- Marc Rzepczynski, LHP (4.132): $1.9MM projected salary
- Josh Tomlin, RHP (4.033): $1.7MM
- Carlos Carrasco, RHP (3.147): $1.4MM
- Chris Gimenez, C (3.097): $700K
- Bryan Shaw, RHP (3.081): $1.5MM
- Lonnie Chisenhall, 3B (3.027): $2.2MM
- Non-tender candidate: Gimenez
Contract Options
- Mike Aviles, 2B/SS/3B: $3.5MM club option with a $250K buyout
Free Agents
From a non-player standpoint, there figures to be little change within the Indians organization. Former GM Mark Shapiro, now the team president, will again entrust GM Chris Antonetti with structuring a contending club despite limited payroll flexibility. Manager Terry Francona and the coaching staff all seem likely to return as well.
The payroll figures to again be Cleveland’s biggest obstacle, as long-term commitments to Nick Swisher and Michael Bourn went south this season. Each player battled injuries and struggled at the plate, making their respective $15MM and $13.5MM salaries look questionable on a team otherwise loaded with many bargains. Also worth noting were the sub-par contributions of David Murphy in his first year with the Indians; his $6.5MM salary in 2015 a year after hitting just .262/.319/.385 and checking in below replacement level further clouds the outfield picture.
With $55MM already committed to the next year’s payroll and possibly another $10MM or so in arb salaries (plus the league-minimum players to fill out the roster), the Tribe could be looking at about $70MM in commitments before making a single decision.
Cleveland finished last in all of Major League Baseball with about 1.437MM fans drawn this season, so it seems unlikely that the team’s payroll will rise significantly from the $80-84MM range that has been set in 2013-14. That will leave Antonetti with somewhere between $10-15MM to augment a roster of affordable contracts.
The Indians can trot out a rotation fronted by Cy Young candidate Corey Kluber and followed by breakout 27-year-old Carlos Carrasco. Beyond that pairing, the team can look for another step forward from former top prospect Trevor Bauer and a better overall effort from the hard-throwing Danny Salazar. Josh Tomlin, Zach McAllister and T.J. House represent options in the fifth slot, and House was particularly impressive in 2014, posting a 3.35 ERA with 7.1 K/9 and 1.9 BB/9 in 102 innings. Starting pitching, therefore, doesn’t need to be a major focus for Cleveland this winter, though it wouldn’t be surprising to see some veteran arms added on minor league deals just for depth purposes.
Cleveland’s affordable talent isn’t confined to the pitching staff, however. Standout catcher Yan Gomes will earn just $1MM next season in the first year of a six-year, $23MM contract extension. Carlos Santana and his relatively modest $6MM salary will man first base, with Jason Kipnis and his $4MM salary handling the keystone. Jose Ramirez’s excellent glove will likely open the season at shortstop, with top prospect Francisco Lindor perhaps pushing for a call-up midseason. And of course, MVP candidate Michael Brantley will be looking to replicate his breakout in left field while earning $5MM.
Meanwhile, in the bullpen, Cody Allen looks like a formidable ninth-inning weapon, and he’s yet to reach arbitration. He can be joined in the late innings by Bryan Shaw, Scott Atchison, Marc Rzepczynski and Kyle Crockett — each of whom posted a sub-3.00 ERA in at least 30 innings of work. Nick Hagadone joins Crockett and Rzepczynski as a left-handed option. Perhaps best of all, none from this group projects to earn more than $1MM, save for Rzepczynski.
Those cost-controlled players are critical for the Indians. While the Swisher and Bourn commitments don’t prevent them from adding another sizable salary or multiple lower to mid-range salaries in 2015, those large contracts do throw a wrench into their offseason approach. Cleveland already has $51MM committed to the 2016 roster — a season in which Kluber and Allen will become arbitration eligible for the first time. Each figures to see a significant hike in salary should his current success continue. Carrasco will be eligible for the second time that year, and if he can come close to replicating this season’s second-half breakout — something Cleveland desperately needs in order to contend — his arbitration raise will also be very steep. Shaw, Rzepcznski, Chisenhall and others will be due further raises heading into 2016.
Essentially, the Indians are looking at the same guaranteed contract structure they face in 2015, but with an arb class that is potentially twice as costly. So, while they may have $10-15MM to comfortably add to the 2015 payroll, they can’t afford to make long-term commitments beyond the upcoming season without either increasing that payroll significantly or moving some salary. For example, a name like Chase Headley looks appealing as an alternative to Lonnie Chisenhall, who hit just .225/.295/.318 after June 30 and is a very poor defender, but Headley would likely send the 2016 payroll well beyond $85MM (assuming Tim Dierkes’ four-year, $48MM contract projection is correct or close to it).
The team’s financial situation makes one-year commitments the most likely for a significant addition, but the free agent market lacks an obvious one-year candidate at third, which is a position of need. The other logical place to upgrade would be in right field or possibly at DH. In those areas, Colby Rasmus could prove an upgrade over Murphy, with Swisher sliding into a primary DH role. The Indians could also buy low on a name like Corey Hart of Kendrys Morales on a one-year deal to serve as the DH, with the hope that Swisher and/or Murphy rebounds enough to handle right field full-time. It wouldn’t take much, after all, to upgrade on the .188/.254/.311 batting line posted by Cleveland DHs in 2014.
Another option for the Indians would be to pursue an upgrade on the trade market. Juan Uribe and Casey McGehee are two short-term options that could make some sense if their respective teams are interested in making a long-term upgrade at the hot corner. There are a number of right fielders that would fit the bill as well, including Jason Heyward, Justin Upton (though the Indians were on his initial no-trade list), Shane Victorino and Gerardo Parra. Cleveland showed interest in Victorino as a free agent two years ago and could have interest again, particularly if Boston is willing to eat some of his salary.
Of course, pursuit of a name like Heyward would present the question of whether or not Cleveland wants to compromise some of its long-term outlook for an improved chance at immediate contention. The Indians do have a strong group of minor league outfielders headlined by Clint Frazier and also including Tyler Naquin, James Ramsey and Bradley Zimmer — each a first-round pick within the past three years. Some fans would likely make the case that a team with long-term payroll constraints should be resistant to trading controllable/league-minimum talent for a one-year upgrade, but being within striking distance of a postseason berth is an oft-fleeting position. The team could consider this its best shot at a division title with the Royals potentially losing James Shields and the Tigers potentially losing Max Scherzer and Victor Martinez, so the argument in favor of a win-now move could certainly be made.
Perhaps the most appealing approach for the front office will simply to be to add a bullpen piece and search for minor upgrades and platoon partners for some of the 2014 regulars that struggled. While they won’t play for top-of-the-market names like David Robertson and Andrew Miller, a number of second-tier options such as Pat Neshek, Jason Grilli, Sergio Romo or Joba Chamberlain would add a veteran presence and deepen the relief corps.
Going that route and experiencing success would also likely require at least one of their faded stars to rebound, which isn’t out of the question. Swisher is just one season removed from totaling 2.3 fWAR and 3.8 rWAR, so a rebound isn’t out of the question. Bourn, too, was somewhat productive in 2013, though to a lesser extent.
The Indians could try to dump one or both players, though that’s no easy feat to accomplish. Still, should the Indians eat the majority of one of their 2015 salaries in order to save $8-10MM in 2016, a long-term commitment for a new addition would certainly be easier to structure.
In the end, barring an unexpected payroll boost for the 2016 season, the team’s 2015 maneuverability is limited. The team will have to determine whether it’s worth compromising its enviable reservoir of outfield prospects in order to make a short-term upgrade, or if the better option is to make minor upgrades where possible and bank on a resurgence among a group of underperforming veterans. For all the ink I’ve dedicated to Bourn and Swisher, the most sorely needed rebound may be one from Kipnis, who slumped to a .240/.310/.330 line after posting elite numbers in 2013.
Joe Butler 2
Great article. I get where you’re coming from with the win-now mentality, but I’d say they should keep the controllable prospects over going for a one-year upgrade somewhere, since obviously they’d be able to keep them longer.
AmericanMovieFan
*Swisher has $45MM coming to him from 2015-2017 w/ a vesting option for 2018.
LazerTown
option is $14MM.
I was sad to see swisher go, especially when the next winter they gave 3X as much money to Ellsbury. It’s unbelievable how much he has dropped off though since leaving NY.
Steve Adams
Option is for 2017. He signed a four-year, $56MM contract that runs 2013-16 and paid him $11MM in 2013 and $15MM annually thereafter. As LazerTown noted, the vesting option is for $14MM.
Yohan
Wow they signed two aging stars and things went south…I’m shocked.
MyTribe 2
No, actually, Bourn and Swisher were instrumental in turning the tide in 2013 on the second half collapses the Indians had had the prior two season. Bourn only played when he was healthy enough to play, he was average and did not hurt the team the way that Swisher, Cabrera, Masterson, Raburn and Kipnis did.
Out of place Met fan
What would the Indians net for Ramirez?
Kadoc
Probably not much.
glenstein
Yan Gomes is missing from the list of players with guaranteed contracts.
Steve Adams
Thank you. I remember adding up his total remaining salary while working on that section, but I somehow left him off and only alluded to the long-term deal in the body. Definitely an oversight. Much appreciated.
MrEMann
On a side note, Kipnis has had one really good month in his career (June 2013). That doesn’t make for an elite player, and his final 2013 numbers were good – nowhere near elite. Again, take away his June numbers, and his numbers for 2013 would look pretty similar to 2014 (although he hit for more power in 2013).
tomymogo
A win-now mentality…..
I want to ask, what would you guys think about a trade like this:
Michael Bourn, Bradley Zimmer and Kyle Crockett for Justin Upton, BJ Upton and 20 million.
Trading BJ maybe can persuade Justin to approve the deal to Cleveland, Atlanta sends 20 million and takes the bad contract of Michael Bourn and two high draft picks from 2014 and 2013 (which the Indians can get back by offering Justin arbitration at the end of the year).
thejamootz
I can’t imagine why the Indians (or anyone) would be willing to trade anything of value in order to pay B.J. Upton through 2017.
The $20 million doesn’t even cover half of what Upton is owed over the next three years.
tomymogo
Michael Bourn is owed 27 million, the difference between him and BJ is 20 million.
I think a change of scenary can benefit both players
basquiat
Why would the Braves want Bourn back? They knew he was slowing down when they let him walk and speed was his best asset.
tomymogo
Yes I agree, but they are trading BJ Upton, so that’s why I thought to myself, what Indians player has a contract almost as bad as BJ Upton’s contract, and that’s why I came up with Michael Bourn.
I know both players have underachieved to say the least, injuries have slowed Bourn down, but he can still leadoff when healthy and Braves desperately need a leadoff hitter.
basquiat
‘Bounce back’ are the key words in Cleveland. They are expecting Swisher, Bourn, Kipnis and Murphy to bounce back. Three of those guys are on the wrong side of 30. That’s a lot of ‘ifs’ but then again, Indian fans go through this every year.
bdpecore
Would the Indians be willing to trade Swisher + $4M for this season for Geraldo Parra? This gives the Brewers a 1B for two seasons and the Indians OF depth and more payroll flexibility in 2016.
Hunter 2
I think the Indians would have to make that trade if it was offered. And even though I really like Swish, that would be the best move from a baseball standpoint, and from a front office prospective.
andrewk
Swisher was terrible both at the plate and at 1B last season (he was demoted to DH, before having knee surgery). The Tribe would do that trade in a heartbeat, even without Parra thrown in.
MyTribe 2
The Indian’s don’t have to play anyone just because they make a lot of money IF they have a low cost replacement already on the 40 man roster. And a correction on Murphy, Murphy led the team in slugging percentage when runners were in scoring position.
methus1
Ramirez did NOT have an “excellent glove” at SS. You have to watch the games – you can’t just look at # or errors and make an opinion about a player. He is a bad decision-maker and cannot turn a DP. SS is a position that requires a field general- and it’s not him. Ramirez is a 2B and played that in the minors. Maybe he can take the job from Kipnis, who looked entitled and horrible last year. Defense cost this team the playoffs, so they can’t afford to play him at SS everyday. And lay off Bourn. Again, you have to watch the games. He was fantastic in CF in the second half last year. Don’t just look at stats and throw him into the “he’s a bust like Swisher” hopper.
Rick Boyle
Lets go for broke – sign Victor as DH, Scherzer as #1, and Headley at 3B. Too good to be true, but it would put usover the hump!!