In today’s column, Nick Cafardo of the Boston Globe writes that Jake Peavy has gone from a likely minimal contract in free agency to a possible three-year deal. The Giants are interested in re-signing him because they need him, and manager Bruce Bochy has gotten great work out of him. For his part, the 33-year-old appears to enjoy being back with Bochy, his manager during his glory years in San Diego. Here’s more from today’s column..
- A major league source tells Cafardo that Victor Martinez’s preference is to stay with the Tigers and, therefore, Detroit will get the first crack at him. The interest is mutual and the Tigers would like to get something done sooner rather than later.
- If A’s GM Billy Beane listens to offers on Jeff Samardzija this offseason, you can count the Red Sox as one of the possible interested parties. The Sox inquired with the Cubs about him before the trade deadline, and they would not give up a package that included lefthanded pitching prospect Henry Owens.
- Orioles outfielder/DH Nelson Cruz enjoys Baltimore and wants to stay, but Cafardo expects the Yankees, Rangers, and Mariners to be in on the bidding. No matter what, the 34-year-old looks like he’ll make a bundle somewhere on a three- or four-year deal.
- First baseman Adam LaRoche likely won’t re-signed by the Nationals, who could move Ryan Zimmerman to first base. However, LaRoche lines up nicely as a target for the Brewers, who have toyed with the idea of Ryan Braun moving to first but will likely keep him in the outfield. He could draw interest from the Orioles if they lose Cruz.
- While there’s intrigue over Korean shortstop Jung-Ho Kang, there’s still some pushback from scouts who have seen him play on whether he can translate well to MLB. Some are worried about the pronounced leg kick in his stance that lasts deep into his swing. There also has always been skepticism over his defensive ability, even though he won the Korean version of the Gold Glove.
Tituswash
I think they should try Braun at 1st in spring training…He was horrible in RF so even if he is below average that still helps them a ton. But Idk if he can be good enough to be passable.
mrnatewalter
Parra, Davis, and Gomez in the outfield, that might work.
Tituswash
Or hang Khris Davis out there and see what kind of offers you can get. Then you can move Braun back to LF and have Parra in RF. Someone needs to budge…Davis in LF and Braun in RF is a serious issue.
mrnatewalter
That’s definitely an option. Although, I’m not sure why you’d want to. Davis had 3.5 WAR in basically 1.5 seasons and cost-controlled for another 4 years.
But I agree, the corner outfield was certainly a liability for Milwaukee this year.
Tituswash
Even if you be generous and say he is a 2WAR offensive guy he easily destroys half of that with horrible defense. I more would hang him out there to see if I could improve a different area while taking away from an area of strength. I don’t consider Davis much more than an average outfielder and those kind of guys aren’t to hard to find.
If you can get a decent 1st baseman or 3rd baseman by trading Khris Davis then you can go get the other on the open market. You improve your offense and make your defense a lot better.
Me personally I’d like to see them improve the defense this off-season.
Mikenmn
it’s not out of the question that the Yankees could bid on Cruz, but there’s no logic to it. Why would they pick up another mostly DH player and jam up the inevitable A-Rod/Beltran/Tex/McCann rotation? In that case, go for Headley and at least you have someone who can play third.
MB923
Very true, though to this day, I STILL do not understand why people list Tex as DH. He only plays when he’s healthy, and when he plays he’s at 1B like 95% of the time. Here’s a stat you should know :
Since 2009
# of games at DH for Teixeira – 33
# of games at 1B for David Ortiz – 30
In other words, Tex DH’s as much as Papi plays 1B. Worrying about Tex taking up a DH spot is like worrying about Ortiz taking up a 1B spot
Simply put, when Tex plays, he’s at 1B, not DH.
Mikenmn
I put Tex in there because he’s getting older, not because he’s an obvious candidate. It’s an odd thing that his wrist problems make him more valuable in the field than at the plate.
Jaysfan1994 2
Well, do the Yankees want a Texiera that gets hurt all the time or a healthy Texiera that plays more than 100 games a season? Wrist injuries are wear and tear injuries caused by something like diving all over the infield like he’s a 180 pound shortstop. A slashline like 209/.308/.391/ that Texiera has put up over the last two injury inflicted seasons have been pretty horrible from a 1B getting paid $23M a year.
Don’t forget there was once a time that Albert Pujols was considered an elite defensive 1B just like Texiera, he DH’s a lot more now and doesn’t dive all over the field because he knows it’s more important that he play around a full 162 than a 120 games.
“I want to stay healthy and play every day,” – Albert Pujols.
NCBirdfan
Yankees signings don’t have to be logical; if they make a mistake, their revenue stream is so much better than anyone else, they can just eat the contract and get the next new shiny object.
MB923
If their was no roster limit, then this would make sense, but there is. That’s why they are stuck with A-Rod, Teixeira and Sabathia. There’s nothing that they can do unless for whatever reason, they find a GM that wants to trade for them which we know ain’t happening, but hence the “for whatever reason”.
And with new TV deals coming in left and right, you’re going to be seeing less and less big name stars become FA, and I think that’s great for the game.
AmericanMovieFan
Can someone explain to me how or why guys like LaRoche and Howard are viewed as massive head aches when a bad season for them, a season that sees them staring down rejected options and trade rumors for the purposes of dumping them due to their albatross nature, is a season in which they hit 20+ HR’s with 90+ RBI’s.
stl_cards16
Laroche isn’t viewed by anyone as a headache, he’s a solid 1B. Howard is a below league average hitter who can only play 1B. There is no value there, especially at his salary.
VAR
I expect the issue with Howard is no one wants to pay 25 million dollars a year for the next two seasons for a negative fWAR player. There is more to life than homeruns and RBIs. Take for example his horrible defense and .223/.310/.380 triple slash. And then take into account he was paid 25 million dollars for that. La Roche isn’t a headache. Just a good player without a spot on a good team.
Lefty_Orioles_Fan
Yankees, Rangers, and Mariners… Really Cafardo?
Why would Cruz want to go back to the Rangers? Makes no sense and the fact the Rangers look like they need to rebuild a bit would be a pretty big speed bump to me. Another speed bump would the rather large salaries they are carrying on the books. Quite frankly, Jon Daniels is lucky to have a job in some ways. He had success early, but not as of late. As for Cruz going to the M’s. I am thinking not! Ownership said NO to Cruz, when someone says no to you, I know I am not one to double back and try again and I am thinking neither is Nelson Cruz. Cruz goes back to the O’s if they can work something out. Right the O’s main concern is the Kansas City Royals!!!!
PS I don’t see LaRoche coming to the Orioles
HopJim
After two World Series, Daniels has as much political capital as Ben. Rangers had record setting number of injuries in 2014, with most players coming back. Overall, more proven talent than Boston currently has and Cruz was well liked by Dallas/Ft. Worth fans. Agree that O’s are good spot for Cruz but only if they come up with the money which Rangers likely could spend.
Bob Bunker
Hard to see A’s and Red Sox being a fit on a Shark deal unless the A’s really love Craig, Nava, or some other prospects that isn’t Owens, Swihart, Betts, or Xander.
liberalconservative
Since the A’s gave up their top prospect to get Shark i doubt they will trade him unless they get back another top prospoect along with other players. The A’s have to many Craigs and navas already on their team. They need middle infield defense not more DHs and outfielders.
mrnatewalter
I think it depends on what the market begins to look like for 2016 Free Agents. There will be a lot of options (barring any extensions) at Starting Pitcher in 2016 that are high quality… Price, Zimmermann, Porcello, Medlen, Latos, Kazmir, Fister (again, I’m guessing several will sign extensions).
I’m not going to give up a top prospect if I can get a equal or greater piece (a subjective case to be made, obviously) compared to Samardzija in Free Agency. And I’m especially not going to go near a trade of that caliber if it doesn’t guarantee him signing an extension.
Brady 2
someone with common sense.
liberalconservative
The market changes fast. Nobody would have thought the A’s would give up Russel for Shark last year but 2 TJ surgeries to start the season changed the team’s needs. What makes no sense in people thinking their back up players are worth a all star.
mrnatewalter
The injuries certainly change the market, but that’s not going to affect what is done in December. In fact, you’ll have a couple average/above-average pitching options probably go unsigned into March. Teams with pitching injuries such as Atlanta faced will be able to get those guys. So yes, injuries often change the market… but would then again, it doesn’t change it that much, as we don’t know which other guys may become available if they are known to not be interested in extending.
Brady 2
Addision Russell wasn’t worth Samardzija with 2 years on his contract. Billy lost 2 pitchers and needed to compete this year so he gambled and it didn’t pay off. He even showed it when he gambled on Jon Lester to bolster the rotation to get them past the ALDS (didn’t even get to that). Billy isn’t going to get same value back for Samardzija on a 1 year deal, especially with the way teams view prospects these days.
liberalconservative
Beane will not get a top 10 prospect but if he does deal Shark it would be for a very good prospect not somebodies 10th best in their system or a 4th outfielder. Beane will wait until allstar break to deal Shark unless some team over spends.
agureghian
I can’t see Billy trading him during the offseason for those reasons. If he is moved, it will be near the trade deadline if the a’s are out of contention. Then he will obviously have more leverage to demand better prospects.
mrnatewalter
I agree. I think the only time that the market really plays into Oakland’s hand will be around June/July. Outside of that, teams likely won’t give up the key pieces when they can get a similar option in December.
Terry Janiak
dont forget, the Athletics got shark at the deadline during a playoff hunt which increased his value. Plus the A’s got shark with a season and a half left on his contract, he now only has 1 season left, which decreases his value from the time the A’s got him. Boston would never part with any of their tier one prospects for a 1 year rental, especially because they don’t even know if theyll be contenting next year. If the A’s listen (which they should) to Bostons good but not tier one propects, theyre might be a trade. Think Ceccini, Marrero, Coyle, Ranaudo, ect
demonopie
The Cubs should sign Jung-Ho Kang, they seem to be collecting short stops.
Ralph Esposito
Maybe they will find one that can actually field?
petrie000
you mean like Castro, Baez and Russell? The first two were just fine in the field this year and Russell’s certainly having no fielding difficulties in the minors.
MikeTroutForMayor
Peavy’s CY Young Season was under Bud Black……
mrnatewalter
He never really attributed his Cy Young to Bochy… Peavy had a 3.51 ERA and 8.9 K/9 in his 5 seasons playing under Bochy in San Diego. That’s not too shabby.
JimJ
The Rangers could have inked Cruz to a 3 year deal after the 2013 season but Jon Daniels, true to form, blew it. Now he’ll have to fork over a lot more money to get him back. Ain’t gonna happen. Too bad for the Rangers
Spitballer
Could we get a link to the main article? Thanks!
Jeff Boice
I expect the Mariners to get Cruz if Baltimore doesnt get him. Both teams give him a better chance at the post season than the Yanks & hes NOT going back to the Rangers.
Stonehands
Sox looking to trade for Shark? If there is any truth to that it will be interesting to see what type of deal Beane and Cherington come up with. IF they wanted to solve multiple problems for both teams in one go, does a deal starting with Samardzija and Donaldson for Betts, Marrerro, and a pitcher open the door?
mrnatewalter
Shark and Donaldson? It’ll take a pretty crafty and substantial offer from Boston, most likely.
Brady 2
I am a big Josh Donaldson fan think his is the best 3rd baseman in the game but I would not give up Mookie for Josh. Josh is 29 who knows he could have peaked already and is a 5 WAR player tops going forward. Mookie was 2.1 in 200 ab. 600 ab 6.4~ WAR under control for longer. A dynamic Lead off hitter that could annually hit 6.5+ WAR OPS+ of 140 wRC+ 130 you don’t trade. They will find a place for him whether it’s center, right or somewhere in the infield. If Ben didn’t want to give up Owens last year, the offer will be even lower now that he has a half year less for Shark.
J.j. Miller
donaldson will be 29 all of next season in 2015, he’s signed for 4 years more. his 14.1 WAR in 2013/2014 is 3rd best in mlb behind trout/mccutchen. You may not want to give up betts, but A’s arent dumb and have no urgency to trade donaldson unless they get a hard to refuse offer.
liberalconservative
Don’t worry that trade will not happen. Donaldson is 4 years away from FA so there is no need for the A’s to trade him. Why would a team like the A’s that will contend next year trade their best players for some lower prospects? That has to be one of the worse trade offers I have seen lately.
Stonehands
Donaldson could get very expensive in arbitration, and it would take a monster package to do. I have seen multiple people speculate a Donaldson trade, this was just an idea off of multiple speculative comments i have read
Terry Janiak
It would defiantly take more than Betts to get Donaldson, however Donaldson will get very expensive through Arbitration, and with Lester, Cespedes, Dunn, and top prospects gone. I think it might be wise to trade either Donaldson or Moss. Im thinking Betts+Owens+pitching prospect for Donaldson
Michael Lucas Jr.
The only way the Red Sox part with Owens & Betts would be in a deal to land Stanton. And that’s not going to happen either. Donaldson is a very good player but Betts & Owens are arguably the Sox 2 best prospects. Beane would take that package in a heartbeat without adding a third prospect like you proposed. But I am thinking Boston would rather keep the prospects & sign Headley or Sandoval instead.
mrnatewalter
Donaldson will most certainly command some money in arbitration. He’s been one of, in not THE best third basemen in the game… he’s not going to come cheap. And not to mention, the A’s could likely receive a pretty sweet package in return for Donaldson… I’d certainly listen to deals if I’m Beane.
Brady 2
Everyone go to fangraphs and read Dave Cameron’s Q&A and find Betts in there. I’m not a big Cameron fan, but he’s on the ball about Betts’ value. He wouldn’t part with Betts for Donaldson either.
liberalconservative
A’s have no payroll concerns this year they have shed more than 20 million with FA and retirements. Betts would never get you a player like Donaldson. Most of the team is coming back next year plus the A’s have Parker and Griffin back so they can compete next year.
IjustloveBaseball
It would be an awful idea for the Yankees to sign Cruz. They already have a ton of salary tied into aging players (Tex, A-rod, Sabathia, Beltran) and he’s going to get overpaid wherever he goes. Nelson Cruz had a career year at a great time, and is going to get paid big time by someone, it just shouldn’t be the Yankees. The Yanks need to focus on filling out their rotation especially with Kuroda likely leaving, and McCarthey as a FA.
Ralph Esposito
Semien, Viciedo and Beck for Samardjizija and Jaso.
mstrchef13
I doubt the O’s will pursue LaRoche. He has publicly disrespected them in the past during free agent signing periods, and I don’t think the team needs a new 1B badly enough to go that route. Davis will be back for another season, Pearce had a solid breakout year, and Christian Walker is a promising young hitter with improving defense.
mrnatewalter
I’m wondering if he’s a name on their list in case Cruz goes elsewhere?
If they lose out on Cruz and don’t exercise their option Markakis, they lose those guys with the risk of losing Wieters and Davis after 2015.
Could a 2-4 year deal with LaRoche be helpful to give them a replacement bat? It’s also attractive as he wouldn’t have to pack up and move elsewhere.
Terry Janiak
Samardzija = 1 year rental
Redsox= declined offer of Owens for Samardjia
His value obviously declined from last year as he hits FA sooner
Garin Ceccini + Sean Coyle+ Daniel Nava for Shark and he agrees to contract extension or it isn’t worth it
Brady 2
Someone with common sense. That’s probably what they would offer maybe a pitcher as well like Ranaudo as well.
bobbleheadguru
Then Red Sox will not get him. Remember that the Tigers will need a replacement for Scherzer. KC will need a replacement for Shields… etc.
The demand will be a lot more than that price tag.
liberalconservative
Redsox do not need Shark since they will not be contending next year. If the sox decided to try to contend they have a better chance of signing Lester.
Terry Janiak
Not true, the redsox have every intention of contending next year hence the pickups of Rusney Castillo, Yoenis Cespedes, and Allen Craig. Craig and especially Bogaerts are expected to have bounce back years, in fact Bogaerts is expected to have a monstrous year. Throw in David Ortiz, Dustin Pedroia, Mike Napoli, and the emergence of Mookie Betts, the Redsox will have a very promising and potentially scary lineup. Any trade for Shark which WILL happen (Bean can’t afford to go all out again as he ruined his teams future) will include a contract extension. Most people view the Sox to aquire 2 top line starters, one via free agency and the other through trades. Considering Shark only has a year left, he will come cheap and won’t affect the farm. If a contract extension is included expect the Redsox to go all out for him as he won’t cost as much as Cole Hamles, Tyson Ross, Chris Sale, ect.
Terry Janiak
Not true, if a contract extension is included, the Redsox will go all out for him, as he will cost much less in terms of prospects than Cole Hamels, Tyson Ross, Chris Sale or any other top line pitcher would. The Redsox will be looking to aquire 2 top like pitcher this offseason, one via free agency and one via trade, and I wouldn’t be suprised of Shark was on the top of their list.
Any did you really think the Royals will go after a 1 year rental who will be too expensive for them to extend? Lol not going to happen.
And I think the Tigers realize they’re main concern is the bullpen. Losing post season after postseason due to their bullpen is an issue. Expect them to go after Andrew Miller, David Robertson.
bobbleheadguru
Just because Red Sox fans want to pick up a top pitcher at a low cost, does not mean that 28 other teams will be accommodating!
Tigers going after a free agent for big dollars for a reliever, if they do that, has nothing to do with whether they go after a starter if they lose Scherzer in a trade… especially because of the Draft pick QO compensation they could use after the 2015 season.
If the Royals make it to the WS and lose, then they will feel compelled to spend their playoff ticket windfall ($20MM+?) at one more run.
Terry Janiak
I get what you’re saying there will be teams interested, but dont forget there are other 1 year rentals are on the market as well such as Cueto and Latos that will be more than likely traded.
But saying “Then Red Sox will not get him” is completely outrageous considering the desperate need of pitching, wealth, trade chips, and the top tier farm they have.
And once again, Shark is a one year rental, The A’s are probably regretting trading Russell for him. The A’s are not getting Bryant, Baez, Gallo, Bogaerts, Betts, Taveras, Correra, or anyone near that caliber prospect for a 1 year rental, sorry, but no team will ever do that. Instead, they will probably get several mid tier prospects or one proven player like Of Daniel Murphy’s caliber