Jonathan Papelbon became the first major free agent to change teams yesterday, agreeing to a four-year contract worth $50MM with the Phillies. Reactions to the contract were generally mixed, though almost everyone agreed that the size of the deal was staggering. Let's round up the latest from the relief pitcher market…
- Paul Sullivan of The Chicago Tribune reports that Cubs president of baseball operations Theo Epstein has had preliminary talks with Kerry Wood, who is expected to return next season. The 34-year-old righty pitched to a 3.35 ERA in 51 IP after returning to Chicago's north side on a below-market one-year, $1.5MM contract last winter.
- Despite reports of a four-year, $44MM offer, MASN's Jen Royle hears from a source that the Phillies only offered Ryan Madson a three-year contract. They were unwilling to give him the extra year he wanted (Twitter link).
- The Red Sox, meanwhile, were not willing to give Papelbon a guaranteed fourth year according to Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports (on Twitter).
- MLB.com's Peter Gammons reports (on Twitter) that the Red Sox offered Papelbon to the Braves in exchange for Javier Vazquez two offseasons ago. Atlanta rejected the offer, then traded Vazquez to the Yankees shortly thereafter.
- Jon Paul Morosi of FOX Sports wrote about how the rest of the closers' market is shaping up and the impact of Papelbon's contract. Here is our look at the trade and free agent markets for right-handed relievers.
LioneeR
Vasquez for Papelbon? I can’t imagine how good the Braves bullpen would have been with Papelbon, Venters, EOF, and Kimbrel.
As a Braves fan I am not sure if I’d rather have had Pap or Viz/Melky/Dunn. You have to remember that Viz is pretty electric himself, and that Dunn helped get Uggla to Atlanta.
Bob M.
Wren made the right trade.
BaseballLogic_Braves
Yeah, considering we have 5 years of Uggla with the help of Mike Dunn.
Lunchbox45
I’m pretty sure Dunn wasn’t essential to that trade, you could have just sent another pretty much average loogy instead
BaseballLogic_Braves
He was still part of the trade. You can’t predict who else would’ve been in the package to Florida if Dunn wasn’t in it.
cobrasnake44
I agree you can’t predict who else would have been traded in place of Dunn. But you also can’t predict a player signing an extension with your team after you trade for them. So u can’t over value the trade saying we got Uggla for 5 years when we didn’t know that for sure at that time, just like we don’t know how much Dunn was valued in the trade by the Marlins. Either way you look at it I think we came out good in that deal though.
Alldaybaseball
Yea and Miami
BaseballLogic_Braves
Actually no, it was Florida who we traded with. NOW it’s Miami.
Guest 6190
Absolutely agree.
BaseballLogic_Braves
I think we eon in the Yankees deal, and I think we would’ve won in a Red Sox deal. I would’ve been happy with two years of Pap, although, we wouldn’t have had the “big four” Just the “big three”.
biffsniff
and Michael Dunn was flipped for Dan Uggla. Though I cant stop from salivating at the idea of O’Ventbrel + Paps.
Lunchbox45
the braves literally sent no value to the marlins for uggla.. if you didn’t have dunn you would have just sent another schlep.
BaseballLogic_Braves
Yeah, but he would’ve been expensive if we decided to sign him this offseason. 4/50mil ;] We could’ve gotten 2 more relievers and an outfielder with that kind of money.
TheHotCorner 2
But we may have had to trade one of the “Big Three” to get Uggla since we would not have had Dunn. So we could now be looking at just having a “Big Two” as no way Liberty would have spent the money needed to keep Pap. So I am glad we passed on the Red Sox offer as I don’t think it hurt not having him.
notsureifsrs
it’s crazy to me, but props to papelbon. he went year-to-year for six seasons waiting for this payday and even in a buyer’s market he did exactly what he said he’d always wanted to do and received a record-setting contract
he’s a dbag, but he earned it and took a lot of risks along the way
start_wearing_purple
Not crazy. He got what he wanted and fans in Boston should simply say congrats, thanks for your work, and hopefully we kick your a$$ in the World Series.
Lunchbox45
Thanks for the 2 picks as well.
start_wearing_purple
There’s that too.
genius.gm.on.mlb.the.show
damn!
start_wearing_purple
damn?
Guest 6189
I liked this because, well, you’re right, but also bc you pointed out that he’s still a dbag.
Colin Christopher
With Theo in Chicago, all I can think is that there’s a Tim Wakefield-type “eternally-recurring option year” contract in Kerry Wood’s future. This would be a good thing for Cubs fans, Kerry Wood, and Kerry Wood’s family.
MLB_in_the_Know
Would have loved to have Papelbon, however, due to his cost (through arbitration), the fact he would already be gone and the fact we got Vizciano (who may well end up being Papelbonish in the pen for 6 cheap years), plus Dunn (who we converted into Uggla), and plus (should be minus) Melky’s services for a year, it’s clear that Wren made the better trade.
richaw44
As a Braves’ fan I just don’t understand the need to get a LF bat. Consider this: if Uggla played LF, wouldn’t everyone be satisfied with his production? Prado produces like a second baseman. So those two have good production, just the wrong positions. OK, no offensive deficit. The offense does need to improve, but that should be via better At bats and a much better bench, and a better Jayson Heyward and Broune all year. So leave Prado alone. He brings flexibility and a bat with one off season.
What am I missing?
TDKnies
We don’t play Uggla at 2B for his defense, we play him there because it makes him one of the best hitting 2B in baseball (or at least top 5 before last season). So if we’ve got a big offensive boost at one position, do you say to yourself it’s ok to be below average at another that’s easy to fill? No, you get another big bat to go there as well so your 2B bonus actually means something instead of simply offsetting the drop-off in LF.
Note that I really like Prado and want to keep him, but only as a super-utility guy.
richaw44
Ok TDKnies, I get what you say. BUT, trade JJ + ?? for LF bat, not Prado, because as you say he makes a very good super utility guy. Thanks
TDKnies
That’s my favorite scenario too. I don’t know how likely it is to happen though.
MLB_in_the_Know
For a midlevel payroll team, paying any player over $5 million to be a super utility is not an ideal use of funds.
He should be a starting 2B or 3B, that’s where his value lies. He simply does not have that opportunity in Atlanta. Therefore, if you have a team that sees him as an All Star caliber 2B (remember, he did start the All Star game at 2B last year) and values him as such, we would get the most value out of him by trading him as such.
Yes, he would make a great super utility player (if his salary still reflected such) however his greatest value lies as a starter, unfortunately for the Braves, it won’t be with them.
TDKnies
That’s all pretty relative to how other teams value him though. I’d rather pay him $5 mil to log 400-ish at-bats rotating in at LF, 3B, 2B, and 1B (not to mention the fact that Chipper’s gonna get hurt at some point) than trade him for B- prospects.
MLB_in_the_Know
All it takes is one team to view him as a possible All Star caliber INF and you will be able to get them to overpay for his services.
I am not saying that we should trade Prado for nothing, all I am saying is if you can get a team that views him as an everyday/high caliber player that is willing to pay for him, you explore those options.
MLB_in_the_Know
All it takes is one team to view him as a possible All Star caliber INF and you will be able to get them to overpay for his services.
I am not saying that we should trade Prado for nothing, all I am saying is if you can get a team that views him as an everyday/high caliber player that is willing to pay for him, you explore those options.
Colin Christopher
I like Prado too, and want to keep him, but I think the flaw in your argument is that it would be “easy to fill” Prado’s shoes in LF. His major league numbers from 2008-2010 suggest that last year was the outlier, and we can also assume that injuries played a role in his decreased production last year. Yes, I’m sure we could acquire an OF who we could probably get 20 HRs from, but is he likely to bat .300 and get on base 35-36% of the time? Will he be able to fill in at 1B, 2B, or 3B in case of injuries at any of those positions?
I think it’s reasonable to expect 75-15-75 from a full season of a healthy Prado. Last season, 15 major league LFs hit more than the 15 HRs. Of those 15, five had more than 75 RBI AND more than 75 runs. (One of those five is Ryan Braun, who I think both of us would agree is a freak of nature who no LF alive deserves to be measured against.)
Prado isn’t spectacular in any one facet of the game, but he’s a solid player in every facet of the game. His versatility makes him invaluable, but his injury-plagued production last season lowered his value. Keep him until the trade deadline, or even another full season, so that he can rebuild his value as a trade chip…and help the team, in the meantime.
TDKnies
meh, Prado’s in a weird spot. It would be easy to replace his production in LF, but despite him being our LF he doesn’t spend as much time actually in LF as you’d expect him to. The way we use him is like he’s still the utility guy but there’s a non-existant LF he’s always replacing until someone else gets hurt.
BaseballLogic_Braves
You see, I said basically that and was criticized heavily for it. I completely agree, though.
Daniel Dubay
I thought that Rod Barajas was the first to switch teams this offseason.
Kerry Dempsey
Jim Thome was the first to switch teams ( for a major league contract)